Currency Boards

  • Atish Ghosh
  • Anne-Marie Gulde
  • Holger WolfEmail author
Living reference work entry


Currency boards have a long history, much of it in (mostly British) colonies and dependencies, typically smaller and more open economies. The historical evidence suggests that these boards succeeded in maintaining exchange rate stability and facilitating trade, at the cost of tying up reserves and restricting the scope for monetary policy, with more ambiguous evidence on their broader economic impact. Exits were generally to pegged regimes and proceeded smoothly.

A more recent group of currency boards was motivated by stabilization rather than trade considerations. While the sample is small, the lesson from their experience is straightforward (and unsurprising). Boards deliver short-term stabilization and an extended honeymoon period. Whether stability lasts depends on policy choices during the honeymoon period. Countries using the good times to achieve lasting fiscal balance while vigilantly counteracting real appreciation and prudently managing capital inflows stand to reap longer-term benefits at modest costs. Those that do not are likely to face an unpleasant reckoning with reality a few years down the line. The latter experience has been more common: both Argentina and the Baltics eventually faced crises reflecting external developments aggravated by domestic political choices. The Baltics, with a clear exit path to the Euro, doubled down on the boards and eventually achieved a smooth transition. Argentina, lacking a clear longer-term transition perspective, shifted to a flexible exchange rate.

Overall, the experience suggests that CBAs are neither a low-cost panacea for all monetary ailments nor an overly restrictive arrangement all but certain to end in crisis. Rather, as with all exchange rate regimes, they promise specific benefits and come with specific costs, necessitating a careful consideration of the trade-offs in the particular circumstances.


Currency board Stabilization Credibility Exit strategy Policy constraints 


  1. Abbott A (1959) A brief history of the crown agents and their office. Eyre and Spottiswoode, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Alonso-Gamo P, Fabrizio S, Kramarenko V, Wang Q (2002) Lithuania: history and future of the currency board arrangement. IMF working paper 127. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Aslund A, Dombrovskis V (2011) How Latvia came through the financial crisis. Peterson Institute for International Economics, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  4. Bakker B, Gulde A-M (2010) The credit boom in the EU new member states: bad luck or bad policies? IMF working paper 130. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  5. Bank of International Settlements (1953) The Sterling area. Bank of International Settlements, BasleGoogle Scholar
  6. Barro R, Gordon D (1993) Rules, discretion and reputation in a model of monetary policy. J Monet Econ 12(1):101–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baster A (1929) The imperial banks. P.S. King and Son, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Bennett A (1992) The operation of the Estonian Currency Board. IMF Staff Pap 40(2):451–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berengaut J, Lopez-Claros A, Le Gall F, Jones D, Stern R, Westin A-M, Psalida E, Garibaldi P (1998) The Baltic countries – from economic stabilization to EU accession. IMF occasional paper no. 173. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  10. Blanchard O, Griffith M, Gruss B (2013) Boom, bust, recovery: forensics of the Latvia crisis. Brook Pap Econ Act 2:325–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Calvo G, Talvi E (2005) Sudden stops, financial factors and economic collapse in Latin America: learning from Argentina and Chile. NBER working paper no. 11153. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  12. Calvo G, Izquierdo A, Talvi E (2003) Sudden stops, the real exchange rate, and fiscal sustainability: Argentina’s lessons. NBER working paper no. 9828. National Bureau of Economic Research, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Central Bank of Bosnia and Hercegovina (2017) 20 years of stability. CBBH, SarajevoGoogle Scholar
  14. Chalmers R (1893) A history of currency in the British colonies. Eyre and Spottiswoode for HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Clauson G (1944) The British colonial currency system. Econ J 54(213):1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coats W (2007) One currency for Bosnia: creating the Central Bank of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Jameson Books, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  17. Crick W (1965) Commonwealth banking systems. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  18. Daseking T, Ghosh A, Lane T, Thomas A (2005) Lessons from the crisis in Argentina. IMF occasional paper, 236. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. De Haan J, Berger H, Van Fraassen E (2001) How to reduce inflation: an independent Central Bank or a Currency Board? The experience of the Baltic countries. Emerg Mark Rev 2(3):218–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. De la Torre A, Yeyati EL, Schmukler S (2003) Living and dying with hard pegs: the rise and fall of Argentina’s Currency Board. Economia 3:43–107Google Scholar
  21. Enoch C, Gulde A-M (1997) Making a currency board operational. IMF papers on policy analysis and assessment no. 10. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  22. Fleming M (1962) Domestic financial policies under fixed and floating exchange rates. IMF Staff Pap 9:369–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ghosh A, Gulde A-M, Wolf H (2002) Exchange rate regimes: choices and consequences. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  24. Greaves IC (1950) Monetary systems of the colonies. HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Greaves IC (1953) Colonial monetary conditions. HMSO, Colonial research studies, no. 10. HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Gross T, Heft J, Rodgers D (2012) On currency boards – an updated bibliography of scholarly writings. Studies in applied economics, no.1. John Hopkins University, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  27. Gulde A-M (1999) The role of the currency board in Bulgaria’s stabilization. Financ Dev 36(3):36–39Google Scholar
  28. Gulde A-M, Kähkönen J, Keller P (2000) Pros and cons of currency board arrangements in the lead-up to EU accession and participation in the Euro Zone. IMF policy discussion paper 1. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  29. Hanke S (2008) Why Argentina did not have a currency board. Cent Bank J 18(3):56–58Google Scholar
  30. Hanke S, Schuler K (1991) Keynes’ Russian currency board. In: Hanke S, Walters A (eds) Capital markets and development. ICS Press, San Francisco, pp 43–63Google Scholar
  31. Hanke S, Schuler K (1994) Currency boards for developing countries: a handbook. ICS Press, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  32. Hanke S, Sekerke M (2003) The forgotten currency board: St. Helena. Cent Bank J XIII(3):77–81Google Scholar
  33. Hansson A, Randveer M (2013) Economic adjustment in the Baltic countries. Working paper 1. Eesti Panki, TalinnGoogle Scholar
  34. Hazlewood A (1952) Sterling balances and the colonial currency system. Econ J 62:942–945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hazlewood A (1953) Colonial external finance since the war. Rev Econ Stud 21(1):31–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ho C (2002) A survey of the institutional and operational aspects of modern-day currency boards. Bank for International Settlements working paper international, no. 110-1-21. Bank for International Settlements, BasleGoogle Scholar
  37. Honohan P (1997) Currency Board or Central Bank? Lessons from the Irish Pound’s link with Sterling, 1928–79. BNL Q Rev 200:39–67Google Scholar
  38. Hopkins A (1970) The creation of a colonial monetary system: the origins of the West African Currency Board. Afr Hist Stud 3(1):101–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jao YC (1974) Banking and currency in Hong-Kong: a study of postwar financial development. Macmillan, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kamhi N, Dehejia VH (2006) An assessment of the currency board regime in Bosnia and Hercegovina. Emerg Market Financ Trade 42(6):46–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Knobl A, Sutt A, Zavoico B (2002) The Estonia Currency Board: its introduction and role in the early success of Estonia’s transformation to a market economy. IMF working paper 96. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  42. Korhonen I (1999) Currency boards in the Baltic countries: what have we learned? BOFIT discussion paper 6. Bank of Finland, Institute for Economies in Transition, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  43. Kovacevic D (2003) The currency board and monetary stability in Bosnia-Hercegovina, in Bank for International Settlements, regional currency areas and the use of foreign currencies. BIS papers no 17. Bank for International Settlements, BasleGoogle Scholar
  44. Kwan Y, Lui F (1996) Hong Kong’s Currency Board and changing monetary regimes. NBER working paper no. 5723. National Bureau of Economic Research, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  45. Lättemäe R, Randveer M (2004) Monetary policy and EMU enlargement: issues regarding ERM II and adoption of the Euro in Estonia. Atl Econ J 32(4):293–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Latter T (2004) Hong Kong’s exchange rat regimes in the twentieth century: the story of three regime changes. Working paper 17. Hong Kong Institute for Monetary Research, Hong KongGoogle Scholar
  47. Lau G (2000) Discussion on currency boards and catching up: the Irish experience. Enlargement papers 1. EU Commission, Brussels. pp 82–87Google Scholar
  48. Lettiche JM (1974) Dependent monetary systems and economic development: the case of Sterling East Africa. In: Sellekaerts W (ed) Economic development and planning: essays in honor of Jan Tinbergen. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 186–236Google Scholar
  49. Loynes JB (1962) The West African Currency Board 1912–1962. West African Currency Board, LondonGoogle Scholar
  50. Moynihan M (1975) Currency and Central Banking in Ireland 1922–1960. Gill and Macmillan, DublinGoogle Scholar
  51. Mundell R (1962) The appropriate use of monetary and fiscal policy for internal and external stability. IMF Staff Pap 9(1):70–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mundell R (1963) Capital mobility and stabilization policy under fixed and flexible exchange rates. Can J Econ Polit Sci 29:475–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Narsey W (2016) British imperialism and the making of colonial currency boards. Palgrave studies in the history of finance. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nenovsky N, Hristov K (2002) The new currency boards and discretion: empirical evidence from Bulgaria. Econ Syst 26(1):55–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Newlyn W, Rowan D (1954) Money and banking in British Colonial Africa. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  56. Oppers S (2000) Dual currency boards: a proposal for currency stability. IMF working paper, WP/00/199. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  57. Paolera GD, Taylor AM (2001) Straining at the anchor. NBER and University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Perry G, Servén L (2003) The anatomy of a multiple crisis. Policy research working paper no 3081. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  59. Poirot C (2003) Did the currency board resolve Bulgaria’s financial crisis of 1996–97? J Post Keynesian Econ 26(1):27–55Google Scholar
  60. Purfield C, Rosenberg C (2010) Adjustment under a currency peg Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania during the global financial crisis 2008–09. IMF working paper WP/10/213. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  61. Repse E (1999) Mr. Repse gives a short speech on monetary policy in Latvia and exchange rate strategies. BIS Rev 125/199Google Scholar
  62. Sayers R (1952) Banking in the British commonwealth. Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  63. Schenk C (1994) Britain and the Sterling area: from devaluation to convertibility in the 1950s. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  64. Schenk C (1997) Monetary institutions in newly independent countries: the experience of Malaya, Ghana and Nigeria in the 1950s. Finan Hist Rev 4:181–198Google Scholar
  65. Schoors K (2003) The effect of Soviet monetary disintegration on the collapse of trade between members of the commonwealth of independent states. Econ Syst 27:1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Schuler K (1992) Currency boards. PhD Dissertation, George Mason UniversityGoogle Scholar
  67. Schwartz A (1993) Currency boards: their past, present and possible future role. Carn-Roch Conf Ser Public Policy 39:147–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sepp U, Randveer M (2002) Aspects of the sustainability of the Estonian Currency Board arrangement. Working papers of Eesti Pank, 5. Eesti Pank, TalinnGoogle Scholar
  69. Special Correspondent (Sidney Caine) (1948/49/50) Monetary systems in the colonies. The Banker, various issues, 87–89Google Scholar
  70. Staehr K (2015) Exchange rate policies in the Baltic States: from extreme inflation to Euro membership. CESifo Forum 16(4):9–18Google Scholar
  71. Sunderland D (2004) Managing the British Empire. The Royal Historical Society, The Boydell Press, WoodbridgeGoogle Scholar
  72. Thom R, Walsh B (2002) The effect of a currency union on trade: lessons from the Irish experience. Eur Econ Rev 46(6):1111–1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Treadgold M (2003) The Philippine Currency Board arrangement, 1945–48: a case of deflationary bias? Finan Hist Rev 10:57–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Treadgold M (2005) Colonial currency boards: the seigniorage issue. Hist Econ Rev 41:126–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Treadgold M (2006) Factors inhibiting deflationary bias in currency board economies: evidence from the colonial era. Aust Econ Hist Rev 46:130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Tsang S-k (1999) Legal frameworks of currency board regimes. Q Bull, Hong Kong Monetary Authority 8:50–63Google Scholar
  77. Tsang S-k (2000) The evolution and prospects of the Hong Kong CBA. Mimeo. Eesti Pank, TalinnGoogle Scholar
  78. Twarowska K (2014) The role of the currency board in the Latvian economy. Ann Univ Mariae Curie-Sklodowska, Section H XLVIII(2):111–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Uche CU (1997) Bank of England vs the IBRD. Explor Econ Hist 34:220–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Vice D (1983) The coinage of British West Africa and St. Helena 1684–1958. Format Publications, BirminghamGoogle Scholar
  81. Wolf H (2016) Currency boards as a path toward the Eurozone: lessons from the Baltics. Int Econ Econ Policy 13(1):45–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wolf H, Ghosh A, Berger H, Gulde A-M (2008) Currency boards in retrospect and prospect. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Monetary FundWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.School of Foreign ServiceGeorgetown UniversityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations