[Dis]connected Households: Transnational Family Life in the Age of Mobile Internet

  • Earvin Charles CabalquintoEmail author
Living reference work entry


Rapid technological innovations have revolutionized the ways in which Internet connectivity is utilized by individual users across diverse contexts. On a more specific note, the integration of the mobile Internet into a transnational household reproduces new textures and processes in sustaining familial linkages. This chapter illuminates how 21 Overseas Filipino Workers (OFWs) in Melbourne, Australia, and their left-behind family members use Internet-powered mobile devices and networked communications platforms in forging and maintaining family life at a distance. It deploys the theory of mediated mobilities (Keightley and Reading, 2014) to examine how technologically mediated mobilities are engendered and undermined by structural and infrastructural forces. Drawing upon in-depth interviews, visual methods, and field note-taking, the study reveals how ubiquitous smartphones and online platforms mobilize the performance of gendered and familial roles, as well as affective surveillance. Furthermore, tactical connectivity is deployed through personalized strategies in overcoming structural and infrastructural barriers. Ultimately, the study approaches the domestication of the mobile Internet as part of a broader social context, such as the operations of a billion-dollar industry of Philippine migration. Paradoxically, Internet connectivity fuels transnational family life as well as legitimizes the retention of structural systems that produce family separation in a globalized economy. It is then by exposing the contradictory mobile experiences embodied and negotiated by transnational family members that this chapter offers a critical lens in critiquing the valorization of migration as a nationalist act in Philippine context.


Transnational family Smartphones Skype Messaging application Mobile Internet Ubiquitous computing Tactical connectivity 


  1. Aguilar F (2014) Migration revolution: Philippine nationhood and class relations in a globalized age. Ateneo de Manila University Press, Quezon CityCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguilar F, Penalosa J, Liwanag T, Cruz RI, Melendrez J (2009) Maalwang buhay: family, overseas migration, and cultures of relatedness in Barangay Paraiso. Ateneo De Manila University Press, Quezon CityGoogle Scholar
  3. Appadurai A (1996) Modernity at large: cultural dimensions of globalization. University of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  4. Bakardjieva M (2003) Virtual togetherness: an everyday-life perspective. Media Cult Soc 25:291–313Google Scholar
  5. Berg S, Taylor A, Harper R (2005) Gift of the gab. In: Harper R, Palen L, Taylor A (eds) The inside text: social, cultural and design perspectives on SMS. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 271–286Google Scholar
  6. boyd D (2011) Participating in the always-on lifestyle. In: Mandiberg M (ed) The social media reader. New York University Press, New York, pp 71–76Google Scholar
  7. boyd D (2014) It’s complicated: the social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  8. Cabalquinto EC (2018a) Home on the move: negotiating differential domesticity in family life at a distance. Media Cult Soc 40:795–816. Scholar
  9. Cabalquinto EC (2018b) “I have always thought of my family first”: an analysis of transnational caregiving among Filipino migrant adult children in Melbourne, Australia. Int J Commun 12:4011–4029Google Scholar
  10. Cabañes J, Acedera K (2012) Of mobile phones and mother-fathers: calls, text messages, and conjugal power relations in mother-away Filipino families. New Media Soc 14:916–930. Scholar
  11. Castells M (2001) The rise of the network society. Blackwell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Chib A, Malik S, Aricat RG, Kadir SZ (2014) Migrant mothering and mobile phones: negotiations of transnational identity. Mob Media Commun 2:73–93. Scholar
  13. Chin S (2018) Singapore wins Internet speed race. Accessed 1 Feb 2019
  14. Creswell JW (2013) Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  15. Cuaresma B (2018) OFW remittances hit $28.1 billion in 2017. Accessed Retrieved 23 Oct 2018
  16. Dobashi S (2005) The gendered use of Ketai in domestic contexts. In: Ito M, Matsuda M, Okabe D (eds) Personal, portable, pedestrian: mobile phones in Japanese life. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 219–236Google Scholar
  17. Emmison M, Smith P (2000) Researching the visual: images, objects, contexts and interactions in social and cultural inquiry. Images, objects, contexts and interactions in social and cultural inquiry. SAGE, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Mabasa R, Miraflor M (2019) Filipinos now world’s heaviest Internet users. Accessed 1 February 2019
  19. Francisco V (2015) ‘The internet is magic’: technology, intimacy and transnational families. Crit Sociol 41:173–190. Scholar
  20. Francisco-Menchavez V (2018) The labor of care: Filipina migrants and transnational families in the digital age. Marston Book Services Ltd, OxfordshireCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fresnoza-Flot A (2009) Migration status and transnational mothering: the case of Filipino migrants in France. Glob Netw 9:252–270. Scholar
  22. Giddens A (2013) The consequences of modernity. Wiley, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  23. Goffman E (1959) The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Goggin G (2011) Global mobile media. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  25. Goggin G (2012a) Google phone rising: the android and the politics of open source. J Media Cult Stud 26:741–752. Scholar
  26. Goggin G (2012b) The iPhone and communication. In: Hjorth L, Burgess J, Richardson I (eds) Studying mobile media: cultural technologies, mobile communication, and the iPhone. Routledge, New York, pp 11–27Google Scholar
  27. Goggin G (2014) Mobile web 2.0, new imaginaries of mobile Internet. In: Herman A, Hadlaw J, Swiss T (eds) Theories of the mobile internet: materialities and imaginaries. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Goggin G, Hjorth L (2009) The question of mobile media. In: Goggin G, Hjorth L (eds) Mobile technologies: from telecommunications to media. Routledge, New York, pp 21–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Greenfield A (2006) Everyware: the dawning age of ubiquitous computing. New Riders, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  30. Guevarra AR (2010) Marketing dreams, manufacturing heroes: the transnational labor brokering of Filipino workers. Rutgers University Press, New BrunswickGoogle Scholar
  31. Haythornthwaite C (2005) Social networks and Internet connectivity effects. Inf Commun Soc 8:125–147. Scholar
  32. Hjorth L (2009) Mobile media in the Asia-Pacific: gender and the art of being mobile. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Hjorth L (2011) It’s complicated: a case study of personalisation in an age of social and mobile media Comm, Pol & Cul 44:45–59Google Scholar
  34. Hjorth L (2012a) iPersonal: a case study of the politics of the personal. In: Hjorth L, Burgess J, Richardson I (eds) Studying mobile media: cultural technologies, mobile communication, and the iPhone. Routledge, New York, pp 190–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hjorth L (2012b) Still Mobile, a case study of mobility, home and being away in Shanghai. In: Wilken R, Goggin G (eds) Mobile technology and place. Routledge, New York, pp 140–156Google Scholar
  36. Hjorth L (2015) Intimate cartographies of the visual: camera phones, locative media and intimacy in Kakao. In: Wilken R, Goggin G (eds) Locative media. Routledge, New York, pp 23–38Google Scholar
  37. Hjorth L, Burgess J, Richardson I (2012) Studying mobile media: cultural technologies, mobile communication, and the iPhone. Routledge, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Holmes D (2005) Communication theory: media, technology, society. SAGE, LondonGoogle Scholar
  39. ITU (2017) ICT facts & figures, the world in 2017. Accessed 12 January 2019
  40. ITU (2016) ITU Key 2005 - 2006 ICT Data. Accessed 12 Mar 2018
  41. Jenkins H (2006) Convergence culture: where old and new media collide. New York University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Katz J, Aakhus M (2002) Perpetual contact: mobile communication, private talk, public performance. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Keightley E, Reading A (2014) Mediated mobilities. Media Cult Soc 36:285–301. Scholar
  44. Lim SS (2016) Asymmetries in Asian families’s domestication of mobile communication. In: Lim SS (ed) Mobile communication and the family: Asian experiences in technology domestication. Springer, London, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  45. Lincoln S, Robards B (2016a) Being strategic and taking control: bedrooms, social network sites and the narratives of growing up. New Media Soc 18:927–943. Scholar
  46. Lincoln S, Robards B (2016b) Editing the project of the self: sustained Facebook use and growing up online. J Youth Stud 20:518–531. Scholar
  47. Lindlof TR, Taylor BC (2002) Qualitative communication research methods, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  48. Lopez M L (2018) May remittances signal GDP boost. Accessed 23 Oct 2018
  49. Madianou M (2012) Migration and the accentuated ambivalence of motherhood: the role of ICTs in Filipino transnational families. Glob Netw 12:277–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Madianou M (2014) Smartphones as polymedia. J Comput Mediat Commun 19:1–14.
  51. Madianou M (2016a) Ambient co-presence: transnational family practices in polymedia environments. Glob Netw 16:183–201.
  52. Madianou M (2016b) Polymedia communication among transnational families: what are the long-term consequences for migration. In: Kilkey M, Palenga-Möllenbeck E (eds) Family life in an age of migration and mobility: global perspectives through the life course. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 71–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Madianou M, Miller D (2012) Migration and new media: transnational families and polymedia. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  54. Madianou M, Miller D (2013) Polymedia: towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. Int J Cult Stud 16:169–187. Scholar
  55. Matsuda M (2009) Mobile media and the transformation of family. In: Goggin G, Hjorth L (eds) Mobile technologies: from telecommunications to media. Routledge, New York, pp 62–72Google Scholar
  56. McKay D (2007) ‘Sending dollars shows feeling’ – emotions and economies in Filipino migration. Mobilities 2:175–194. Scholar
  57. Mckay S (2015) “So they can remember me when I’m gone”: remittances, fatherhood and gender relations of Filipino migrant men. In: Hoang LA, Yeoh BSA (eds) Transnational labour migration, remittances and the changing family in Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 111–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mendes S, Alampay E, Soriano E, Soriano C (2007) The Innovative use of mobile applications in the Philippines - Lessons for Africa. Accessed 23 Feb 2013
  59. Miller D (2009) What is a mobile phone relationship? In: Alampay E (ed) Living the information society in Asia. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore, pp 25–35Google Scholar
  60. Miller D, Slater D (2000) The Internet: an ethnographic approach. Berg, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  61. Morley D (2000) Home territories: media, mobility and identity. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  62. Papacharissi Z (2009) The virtual geographies of social networks: a comparative analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn and ASmallWorld. New Media & Soc 11:199–220.
  63. Parreñas RS (2001a) Mothering from a distance: emotions, gender, and intergenerational relations in Filipino transnational families. Fem Stud 27:361–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Parreñas RS (2001b) Servants of globalization: women, migration and domestic work. Standford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  65. Parreñas RS (2005) Long distance intimacy: class, gender and intergenerational relations between mothers and children in Filipino transnational families. Glob Netw 5:317–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Parreñas RS (2008) Transnational fathering: gendered conflicts, distant disciplining and emotional gaps. J Ethn Migr Stud 34:1057–1072. Scholar
  67. Pertierra R (2006) Transforming technologies: altered selves, mobile phone and Internet use in the Philippines. De La Salle University Press, ManilaGoogle Scholar
  68. Pertierra R, Ugarte E, Pingol A, Hernandez J, Dacanay NL (2002) TXT-ing selves: cellphones and Philippine modernity. De La Salle Univerisity Press, ManilaGoogle Scholar
  69. Philippine Overseas Employment Administration, 2014-2015 Overseas Employment Statistics (2015). Accessed 19 Nov 2016
  70. Qui JL (2007) The wireless leash: mobile messaging service as a means of control. Int J Commun 1:74–91Google Scholar
  71. Rakow LF, Navarro V (1993) Remote mothering and the parallel shift: women meet the cellular telephone. Crit Stud Mass Commun 10:144–157. Scholar
  72. Richardson I, Wilken R (2012) Parerga of the third screen: mobile media, place and presence. In: Goggin G, Wilken R (eds) Mobile technology and place. Routledge, New York, pp 198–212Google Scholar
  73. Rodriguez RM (2002) Migrant heroes: nationalism, citizenship and the politics of Filipino migrant labor. Citizenship Stud 6:341–356. Scholar
  74. Rodriguez RM (2010) Migrants for export: how the Philippine state brokers to the world. The University of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Stockdale C, McIntyre D (2011) The ten nations where Facebook rules the Internet. Accessed 12 Aug 2014
  76. Tacoli C (1996) Migrating ‘For the Sake of the Family’? Gender, life course and infra-household relations among Filipino migrants in Rome. Philipp Sociol Rev 44:12–32Google Scholar
  77. The ten nations where Facebook rules the Internet (2011). Accessed 12 Aug 2014
  78. Uy-tioco C (2007) Overseas Filipino workers and text messaging: reinventing transnational mothering. Continuum 21:253–265. Scholar
  79. Wellman B, Haythornthwaite CA (2002) The Internet in everyday life. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wilding R (2006) ‘Virtual’ intimacies? Families communicating across transnational contexts. Glob Netw 6:125–142. Scholar
  81. Yeoh BSA, Huang S, Lam T (2005) Transnationalizing the ‘Asian’ family: imaginaries, intimacies and strategic intents. Global Netw 5:307–315. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Communication and Creative ArtsDeakin UniversityGeelongAustralia

Personalised recommendations