Advertisement

Critical Internet Studies

  • Jeremy HunsingerEmail author
Living reference work entry

Abstract

This handbook chapter is an essay supporting an engaged field called critical internet studies. It attempts to describe internet studies and critical internet studies, empowering the field to go forward, inviting an openness to the field with an eye to inclusion instead of performing the heavy boundary-work of exclusion. It attempts to describe critical internet studies broadly while maintaining a critical perspective on some of the claims as to what must be critical internet studies.

Keywords

Internet studies Internet research Critical perspectives Critical internet studies Critical internet research 

References

  1. Abrams MH, Fischer M (1991) Doing things with texts: essays in criticism and critical theory. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Beck U, Giddens A, Lash S (1995) Reflexive modernization: politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Benhabib S (1981) Modernity and the aporias of critical theory. Telos 1981(49):39–59.  https://doi.org/10.3817/0981049039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benhabib S (1986) Critique, norm, and utopia: a study of the foundations of critical theory. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Boltanski L, Thévenot L (1999) The sociology of critical capacity. Eur J Soc Theory 2(3):359–377.  https://doi.org/10.1177/136843199002003010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bourdieu P (1992) The logic of practice. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Bourdieu P (2004) Science of science and reflexivity. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  8. Bourdieu P, Passeron JC (1990) Reproduction in education, society and culture (theory, culture and society series). Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Butler J (2009) Critique, dissent, disciplinarity. Crit Inq 35(4):773–795.  https://doi.org/10.1086/599590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Connolly WE (1993) The terms of political discourse. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  11. Consalvo M, Ess C (2011) The handbook of internet studies, vol 14. Wiley, MaldenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Daston L (2004) Whither critical inquiry? Crit Inq 30(2):361–364Google Scholar
  13. Deleuze G, Guattari F (1988) A thousand plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia. Continuum, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Dutton WH (2013) The Oxford handbook of internet studies. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Foucault M (1980) Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. New York, Pantheon BooksGoogle Scholar
  16. Fuchs C (2011) Foundations of critical media and information studies. Londone, Routledge.  https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203830864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gallie W (1956) Essentially contested concepts. Proc Aristot Soc 56(2):187–198Google Scholar
  18. Gieryn TF (1983) Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. Am Sociol Rev 48(6):781–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guattari F (1984) Molecular revolution: psychiatry and politics (peregrines). Penguin, HarmondsworthGoogle Scholar
  20. Guattari F (1995) Chaosmosis: an ethicoaesthetic paradigm. Bloomington Indiana, Indiana University PressGoogle Scholar
  21. Guattari F (1996) Soft subversions. Semiotext(e), New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Horkheimer M (1982) Traditional and critical theory. In: Critical theory: selected essays. Continuum Pub. Corp, New York, pp 188–243Google Scholar
  23. Horkheimer M (2012) Critique of instrumental reason (trans: O’Connell MJ). Verso, London/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Horkheimer M (2013) Eclipse of reason. Bloomsbury, London/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Horkheimer M, Adorno TW (2002) Dialectic of enlightenment: philosophical fragments (trans: Jephcott E). Stanford, Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
  26. Hunsinger J (2005) Reflexivity in e-science: virtual communities and research institutions. ACM Siggroup Bull 25(2):38–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hunsinger J (2009) Introducing learning infrastructures: invisibility, context, and governance. Learn Inq 3(3):111–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hunsinger J, Klastrup L, Allen M (2010) International handbook of internet research. Springer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jessop B, Sum N-L (2016) What is critical? Critl Policy Stud 10(1):105–109.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2015.1129352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kofman A (2018, October 25). Bruno Latour, the Post-Truth Philosopher, Mounts a Defense of Science. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/25/magazine/bruno-latour-post-truth-philosopher-science.html
  31. Latour B (2004a) Politics of nature: how to bring the sciences into democracy. (trans: Porter C). Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  32. Latour B (2004b) Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Crit Inq 30(2):225–248.  https://doi.org/10.1086/421123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lazarsfeld PF (1941) Remarks on administrative and critical communications research. Z Sozialforschung 9(1):2–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Luke TW (2016) What is critical? Crit Policy Stud 10(1):113–116.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2015.1131617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Marcuse H (1971) An essay on Liberation, 1st edn. Beacon Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  36. Marcuse H (2013) One-dimensional man: studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Taylor and Francis, Hoboken. Retrieved from http://www.123library.org/book_details/?id=111060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Phillips U (1993) Dump the bosses of off your back (Intro). Vermont, PhiloGoogle Scholar
  38. Poster M (2001) What’s the matter with the Internet? University of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  39. Smythe DW, Van Dinh T (1983) On critical and administrative research: a new critical analysis. J Commun 33(3):117–127.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1983.tb02413.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Star SL, Griesemer JR (1989) Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–39. Soc Stud Sci 19:387–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wolin R (1987) Critical theory and the dialectic of rationalism. New German Crit 41:23.  https://doi.org/10.2307/488274CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Communication StudiesWilfrid Laurier UniversityWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations