The agricultural and rural domains are characterized by internal and external drivers which menace the system, such as GM crops’ threats to agriculture and human health, supermarkets’ power over consumers and farmers, the imposition of the WTO liberalizing agenda, and the displacement of farmland to marginal locations due to land speculation. In addition, despite the promises of the green and biotechnology revolutions, the number of both hungry and fat people in the world is high. Meanwhile, food crises are taking place one after another, and industrial agriculture has become one of the most resource-consuming and polluting among all human activities. It is obvious that agriculture and rural policies stand on the threshold of radical reforms. This is the substrate where agroecology is growing.
- Altieri, M. A. (1998). Agroecology. The science of sustainable agriculture. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
- Garrido Peña, F. (1993). La Ecología Política como Política del Tiempo. Editorial COMARES: Granada.Google Scholar
- Guha, R., & Martínez-Alier, J. (1997). Varieties of Environmentalism. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
- van der Ploeg, J. D., & Long, A. (Eds.). (1994). Born from within practice and perspectives of endogenous rural development. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
- Sevilla Guzmán, E. 1997. Los marcos teóricos del pensamiento social agrario. In: Gómez Benito Cristóbal, , and González Rodríguez, Juan Jesús (eds.), Agricultura y Sociedad en la España Contemporánea. Ministerio de Agricultura/CIS. Madrid.Google Scholar
- Toledo, V. M. (1992). What is ethnoecology?: Origins, scope and implications of a rising discipline. Etnoecológica, 1, 5–21.Google Scholar