Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics

2019 Edition
| Editors: David M. Kaplan

Agricultural Coexistence

  • Rosa BinimelisEmail author
  • Fern Wickson
  • Amaranta Herrero
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1179-9_538

Synonyms

Introduction

Agricultural genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have generated substantial controversy in Europe since their introduction and commercialization in 1998. On the one hand, GMOs have been promoted as “high-yield sustainable agriculture” and as a tool for increasing the competitiveness of European agricultural systems (European Commission 2002). On the other hand, opponents have challenged the potential benefits and raised questions about their purposes, exposing competing narratives of development and diverging visions for the future of agriculture (Levidow and Boschert 2008). Critics have also highlighted the failure to account for the significance of scientific uncertainties, paradigms, and values in the development of this technology (McAfee 2003), the loss of freedom of choice for non-GM producers and consumers (Altieri 2005;...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Altieri, M. A. (2005). The myth of coexistence: Why transgenic crops are not compatible with agroecologically based systems of production. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 25(4), 361–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Binimelis, R. (2008). Coexistence of plants and coexistence of farmers: Is an individual choice possible? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 21(5), 437–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Devos, Y., Demont, M., Dillen, K., Reheul, D., Kaiser, M., & Sanvido, O. (2009). Coexistence of genetically modified (GM) and non-GM crops in the European Union. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 29(1), 11–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. European Commission. (2002). Life sciences and biotechnology – A strategy for Europe. Luxembourg: Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM(2002)27 final.Google Scholar
  5. European Commission. (2003a). Commission Recommendation of 23 July 2003 on guidelines for the development of national strategies and best practices to ensure the coexistence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming. Notified under document number C(2003) 2624, (2003/556/EC).Google Scholar
  6. European Commission. (2003b). GMOs: Commission addresses GM crop co-existence, Brussels. Press Release, IP/03/314, 5 Mar.Google Scholar
  7. European Commission. (2010). Commission Recommendation of 13 July 2010 on guidelines for the development of national co-existence measures to avoid the unintended presence of GMOs in conventional and organic crops. offical journal of the european union (2010/c 200/01), 22 July 2010.Google Scholar
  8. IFOAM. (2002). Position on genetic engineering and genetically modified organisms. http://www.ifoam.bio/en/position-genetic-engineering-and-genetically-modified-organisms. Accessed 1 Dec 2015.
  9. Levidow, L., & Boschert, K. (2008). Coexistence or contradiction? GM crops versus alternative agricultures in Europe. Geoforum, 39(1), 174–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Marvier, M., & Van Acker, R. C. (2005). Can crop transgenes be kept on a leash? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 3(2), 93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mascarenhas, M., & Busch, L. (2006). Seeds of change: Intellectual property rights, genetically modified soybeans and seed saving in the United States. Sociologia Ruralis, 46(2), 122–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McAfee, K. (2003). Neoliberalism on the molecular scale. Economic and genetic reductionism in biotechnology battles. Geoforum, 34(2), 203–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Phillipson, M. (2015). Class action lawsuits and anti-GM litigation: The legal frontline of coexistence. Contributed paper prepared for presentation at the seventh international conference on coexistence between genetically modified (GM) and non-GM based agricultural supply chains (GMCC-15), Amsterdam, 17–20 Nov 2015.Google Scholar
  14. Rizov, I., & Rodríguez-Cerezo, E. (2014). The European Coexistence Bureau: Five years’ experience. AgBioforum, 17(1), 22–27.Google Scholar
  15. Verrière, P. (2015). Preventing GMO contamination. An overview of national “coexistence” measures in the EU. Brussels: IFOAM EU Group. 30 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rosa Binimelis
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Fern Wickson
    • 2
  • Amaranta Herrero
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Vic-Central University of CataloniaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.GenØk Centre for BiosafetyTromsøNorway