Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics

2019 Edition
| Editors: David M. Kaplan

American Chestnut and De-extinction Ethics

  • Evelyn BristerEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1179-9_523

Introduction

The American chestnut tree had significant ecological, economic, and cultural value to the forests and residents of the eastern United States until it was decimated by disease in the early twentieth century and became all but extinct. There are several current initiatives to make the American chestnut disease-resistant in hopes of reintroducing it to eastern forests. Chestnut de-extinction initiatives highlight a number of issues relevant to agricultural ethics, including the value of biodiversity, ethical arguments concerning genetically modified organisms (GMOs), and the concept of genomic integrity. In addition, the ethical arguments related to chestnut restoration highlight the tensions and commonalities between agricultural and environmental ethics. Ethical concerns regarding chestnut restoration pivot on questions related to whether the value placed on agricultural species is equivalent to or less than the value placed on wild species and whether there is or should...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Biermann, C. (2014). Not-quite-American chestnuts: Engaging poststructural epistemologies in nature-society research. ACME, 13, 599–608.Google Scholar
  2. De Vries, R. (2006). Genetic engineering and the integrity of animals. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19, 469–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Freinkel, S. (2007). American chestnut: The life, death, and rebirth of a perfect tree. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  4. Jones, C. (2014). Dirty money. Journal of Academic Ethics, 12, 191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Minteer, B. (2014). Is it right to reverse extinction? Nature, 509, 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Powell, W. (2014). The American chestnut’s genetic rebirth. Scientific American, 310, 68–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Smith, A. H. (2012). Breeding for resistance: TACF and the Burnham hypothesis. The Journal of the American Chestnut Foundation, 26, 11–15.Google Scholar
  8. Thompson, P. (2007). Food biotechnology in ethical perspective. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentRochester Institute of TechnologyRochesterUSA