Introduction: New Agro-technologies Require New Legal Protection
For thousands of years, new seeds and new foods have been exchanged and traded without any legal regulation of intellectual property. Huge improvements in seed breeding resulting in increased harvests (like the ones resulting from the so-called Green Revolution in the 1960s) have been achieved just by “brown bagging,” sharing, experimenting, sometimes stealing, and imitating. However, at the end of the 1970s, biotechnology was increasingly perceived by governments as an exciting field of technological innovation that would lead to renewed economic growth and restore international competitiveness for western countries. The huge economic potential of this new field of technology would however only be unlocked, so it was thought if biotechnological inventions were to receive proper legal protection. In the landmark case of Diamond v. Chakrabartyconcerning the patentability of a genetically modified...
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Commission on Intellectual Property Rights, Innovation and Public Health (CIPIH). (2006). Public health, innovation and intellectual property rights. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Correa, C. M. (2006, April). La disputa sobre soja transgénica: Monsanto vs. Argentina. Le Monde Diplomatique/El Dipló.
Drugs for Neglected Diseases Working Group (DNDWG). (2001). Fatal Imbalance, p. 10, http://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/publications/reports/2001/fatal_imbalance_short.pdf. Accessed 19 May 2011.
Glenna, L. L., & Cahoy, D. R. (2009). Agribusiness concentration, intellectual property, and the prospects of rural economic benefits from the emerging biofuel economy. Southern Rural Sociology, 24(2), 111–129.
Harhoff, D., Régibeau, P., & Rockett, K. (2001). Some simple economics of GM food. Economic Policy, 16(33), 265–299.
Herring, R. J. (2007). Stealth seeds: Bioproperty, biosafety, biopolitics. Journal of Development Studies, 43(1), 130–157.
IAASTD. (2008). Synthesis report of the international assessment of agricultural science and technology for development. Washington, DC: Island Press. http://www.agassessment.org/
Jefferson, R. (2006). Science as social enterprise. Innovations, 1(4), 13–44.
Kilman, S. (2010). Superweed outbreak triggers arms race. The Wall Street Journal.
Korthals, M. (2010). Global justice and genomics: Toward global agro-genomics agency. Genomics, Society and Policy, 6, 13–25.
Krikorian, G., & Kapczynski, A. (2010). Access to knowledge in the age of intellectual property (pp. 237–252). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Zone Books. Available at http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/chapters/1890951978chap10.pdf
Mortensen, D. A., Egan, J. F., Maxwell, B. D., Ryan, M. R., & Smith, R. G. (2012). Navigating a critical juncture for sustainable weed management. Bioscience, 62(1), 75–84.
Outterson, K. (2009). The legal ecology of resistance: The role of antibiotic resistance in pharmaceutical innovation. Cardozo Law Review, 31(3), 613–678.
Pogge, T. (2008). World poverty and human rights (2nd ed.). Cambridge/Malden: Polity Press.
Rimmer, M., & McLennan, A. (Eds.). (2010). Intellectual property and emerging technologies. The new biology. Cheltenham: Elgar.
Wallace, H. (2010). Bioscience for life. London: Genewatch.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature B.V.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Korthals, M., van den Belt, H. (2019). Intellectual Property Rights and Trade in the Food and Agricultural Sectors. In: Kaplan, D.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1179-9_381
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1179-9_381
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1178-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1179-9
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities