Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics

2019 Edition
| Editors: David M. Kaplan

Agricultural Ethics

  • Paul B. ThompsonEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1179-9_373

Synonyms

Introduction

Agricultural ethics is a form of practical ethics that addresses ethical issues or questions that arise in conjunction with the production and distribution of food and fiber goods. The scope of agricultural ethics is, in one sense, delimited by the scope of agriculture. Conceived narrowly, agriculture is the use of technology to cultivate crops or the practice of animal husbandry: A narrow scope would exclude the various forms of scavenging, hunting, or fishing that have contributed to human food needs for centuries. It might also exclude activities that occur after food crops or animals leave the premises of a farming operation, including transport, milling or slaughter, further processing, food manufacturing, food or fiber distribution, and retail sales. Defined more broadly, the scope of agriculture might include all of these activities and might further be extended to include a variety of natural resource management practices such as forestry,...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. A. (1979). Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bovenkerk, B., Brom, F. W., & Van den Bergh, B. J. (2002). Brave new birds: The use of ‘Animal Integrity’ in animal ethics. Hastings Center Report, 32(1), 16–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fiester, A. (2008). Justifying a presumption of restraint in animal biotechnology research. The American Journal of Bioethics, 8, 36–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Habermas, J. (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. MacIntyre, A. (1984). Does applied ethics rest on a mistake? The Monist, 67, 498–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Mepham, B. (2000). A framework for the ethical analysis of novel foods: The ethical matrix. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 12, 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Norton, B. G. (2005). Sustainability: A philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. O’Neill, O. (1986). Faces of hunger. London: G. Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  9. Potter, V. R. (1971). Bioethics: Bridge to the future. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  10. Regan, T. (1980). The case for animal rights. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  11. Rollin, B. E. (1995). The Frankenstein syndrome: Ethical and social issues in the genetic engineering of animals. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rollin, B. E. (1998). On telos and genetic engineering. In A. Holland & A. Johnson (Eds.), Animal biotechnology and ethics (pp. 156–171). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rolston, H. (1975). Is there an ecological ethic? Ethics, 85(2), 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sandler, R. L. (2005). Environmental virtue ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  15. Shue, H. (1980). Basic rights. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Singer, P. (1972). Famine, affluence, and morality. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1, 229–243.Google Scholar
  17. Singer, P. (1975). Animal liberation: A new ethics for our treatment of animals. New York: A New York Review Book: Distributed by Random House.Google Scholar
  18. Singer, P. (1979a). Practical ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Singer, P. (1979b). Killing humans and killing animals. Inquiry, 22, 145–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Thompson, P. B. (1995). The spirit of the soil: Agriculture and environmental ethics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Thompson, P. B. (2002). Pragmatism, discourse ethics and occasional philosophy. In J. Keulartz, M. Korthals, M. Schermer, & T. Swierstra (Eds.), Pragmatist ethics for a technological culture (pp. 199–216). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Williams, B. (1985). Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA