Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics

2019 Edition
| Editors: David M. Kaplan

Agricultural Science and Ethics

  • Mickey GjerrisEmail author
  • Mette Vaarst
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1179-9_257

Synonyms

Introduction

Humans live in constant interaction with nature. That is part and parcel of being a biological creature on this planet. On one hand, humans exploit the available resources to survive, and at the same time, humans are deeply dependent on the continued capacity of nature to sustain their lives and the lives of their children and future generations. But something has changed over the past 50 years: Never before in human history have so many animal and plant species been made extinct so fast – and 10–30% of mammal, bird, and amphibian species are currently threatened with extinction; freshwater ecosystems are particularly at risk. Never before has humankind been so destructive and exploitative in relation to ecosystems and vital resources as now. Just as an example, in the last decades of the twentieth century, about 20% of the world’s coral reefs and 35% of the mangrove areas were lost...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abram, D. (1996). The spell of the sensuous. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  2. Anneberg, I. (2013). Actions of and interactions between authorities and livestock farmers – In relation to animal welfare. PhD thesis, Science and Technology, Aarhus University.Google Scholar
  3. Anonymous (2012). ‘Green brain’ project to create and autonomous flying robot with a honey bee brain. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/10/121001111405.htm. Downloaded 1 May 2014.
  4. Beus, C. E., & Dunlap, R. E. (2010). Conventional versus alternative agriculture: The paradigmatic roots of the debate. Rural Sociology, 55(4), 590–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cullather, N. (2010). The hungry world – America’s cold war battle against poverty in Asia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Fang, F. C. (2011). Reductionistic and holistic science. Infection and Immunity, 79(4), 1401–1404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fraser, D. (2008). Understanding animal welfare. The science in its cultural context. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  8. Gamborg, C., & Sandøe, P. (2005). Sustainability in farm animal breeding: A review. Livestock Production Science, 92(3), 221–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Griffiths, J. (2006). Wild. An elemental journey. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  10. Harrison, R. (1964). Animal machines. The new factory farming industry. London: Vincent Stuart Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. Hawkes, C., Chopra, M., & Friel, S. (2009). Globalization, trade, and the nutrition transition. In R. Labonté, T. Schrecker, C. Packer, & V. Runnels (Eds.), Globalization and health: Pathways, evidence and policy (pp. 235–262). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Haynes, R. P. (2008). Animal welfare. Competing conceptions and their ethical implications. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Jones, G. E., & Garforth, C. (1997). The history, development and future of agricultural extension. In B. E. Swanson, R. P. Bentz, & A. J. Sofranko (Eds.), Improving agricultural extension. A reference manual. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. Chapter 1.Google Scholar
  14. Krebs, A. (1999). Ethics of nature. A map. New York: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lesser, L. I., Ebbeling, C. B., Goozner, M., & Ludwig, D. S. (2007). Relationship between funding source and conclusion among nutrition-related scientific articles. PLoS Medicine, 4(1), 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mepham, B. (Ed.). (1996). Food ethics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  18. Robin, M. M. (2010). The world according to Monsanto. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
  19. Steadman, I. (2012). Engineers plan to upload bee brains to flying robots. Wired, 03(10), 12.Google Scholar
  20. Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wasenaar, T., Castel, V., Rosales, M., & de Haan, C. (2006). Livestock’s long shadow: Environmental issues and options. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations.Google Scholar
  21. Suryanarayanan, S., & Kleinman, D. L. (2013). Be(e)coming experts: The controversy over insecticides in the honey bee colony collapse disorder. Social Studies of Science, 43(2), 215–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Thompson, P. B., & Stout, B. A. (Eds.). (1991). Beyond the large farm: Ethics and research goals for agriculture. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  23. Tilman, D., Cassman, K. G., Matson, P. A., Naylor, R., & Polask, S. (2002). Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature, 418, 671–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tybirk, K., Alrøe, H. F., & Frederiksen, P. (2004). Nature quality in organic farming: A conceptual analysis of considerations and criteria in a European context. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 17, 249–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. United Nations. (1987). Our common future. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development, general assembly resolution 42/187. United Nations.Google Scholar
  26. Valentin, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2000). A guide to community sustainability indicators. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20, 381–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Webster, S. (2003). Thinking about biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wiersum, K. F. (1995). 200 years of sustainability in forestry: Lessons from history. Environmental Management, 19(3), 321–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yeates, J., Röcklinsberg, H., & Gjerris, M. (2011). Science in regulation: A critique of policymaking based solely on animal welfare science. Animal Welfare, 20, 423–432.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Food and Resource EconomicsDepartment Food and Resource Economics, University of CopenhagenFrederiksberg CDenmark
  2. 2.Department of Animal Science – Epidemiology and ManagementAarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark