Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics

2019 Edition
| Editors: David M. Kaplan

Food’s Purposes

  • Adam HenschkeEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1179-9_204

Synonyms

Introduction

What is food? Central to any discussion of philosophy of food is a description of what the term “food” can mean. One way to conceptualize food is by reference to its intended use, to look at the ends to which food is put. This is an explicitly teleological approach, by which a thing, in this case food, is made sensible by reference to the goal and outcome that a user has for the given thing. On the teleological account, an action becomes sensible by recognizing three things – the reasons that a person has for acting, their action, and the outcomes of that action (Henschke 2012, pp. 58–60). This entry makes sense of food by reference to the different outcomes that a person might have for food.

A specific case example of a specific food type, bread, is used through this entry. Six purposes for food are described: basic survival, quality of life, pleasure, personal relationships, cultural expression, and trade....

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Buttriss, J. (2005). Strategies designed to increase awareness about folates and health, and to increase folate intake: A review. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 16(6–7), 246–252.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2005.03.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Connors, M., Bisogni, C. A., Sobal, J., & Devine, C. M. (2001). Managing values in personal food systems. Appetite, 36(3), 189–200.  https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.2001.0400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Henschke, A. (2012). Making sense of animal disenhancement. NanoEthics, 6(1), 55–64.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-012-0140-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Higman, B. W. (2012). How food made history. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Joint FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation. (2004). Human energy requirements. Rome: FAO, United Nations.Google Scholar
  6. Kaidar-Person, O., Person, B., Szomstein, S., & Rosenthal, R. J. (2008). Nutritional deficiencies in morbidly obese patients: A new form of malnutrition? Obesity Surgery, 18(8), 1028–1034.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-007-9350-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kessler, D. (2009). The end of overeating. New York: Rodale Books.Google Scholar
  8. Korsgaard, C. M. (2009). Self-constitution: Agency, identity, and integrity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Korsmeyer, C. (2007). Delightful, delicious, disgusting. In F. Allhoff & D. Monroe (Eds.), Food & philosophy: Eat, think and be merry. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. Masset, E. (2011). A review of hunger indices and methods to monitor country commitment to fighting hunger. Food Policy, 36(Supplement 1(0)), S102–S108.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.11.007.
  11. Müller, O., & Krawinkel, M. (2005). Malnutrition and health in developing countries. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 173(3), 279–286.  https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.050342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nestel, P., Bouis, H. E., Meenakshi, J. V., & Pfeiffer, W. (2006). Biofortification of staple food crops. The Journal of Nutrition, 136(4), 1064–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pollan, M. (2008). In defence of food. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  14. Roberts, P. (2008). The end of food: The coming crisis in the world food industry. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  15. The World Bank. (2012). AgResults: Innovation in research and delivery. Retrieved April 17, 2013, from http://web.worldbank.org/.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/EXTABOUTUS/ORGANIZATION/CFPEXT/0, contentMDK:23005969 pagePK:64060249 piPK:64060294 theSitePK:299948,00.html.
  16. Thompson, P. (2010). The agrarian vision: Sustainability and environmental ethics. Lexington: Kentucky University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wansink, B. (2006). Mindless eating: Why eat more than we think. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  18. Wisor, S. (2012). How should INGOs allocate resources? Ethics and Global Politics, 5(1), 27–48.  https://doi.org/10.3402/egp.v5i1.8287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public EthicsCharles Sturt UniversityCanberraAustralia