Food Animal Production, Ethics, and Quality Assurance
As the need increases for sustainable methods of feeding the growing world population, questions have emerged about the quality and safety of foods currently being produced in affluent, developed nations. Various studies indicate that with increasing affluence, consumers tend to shift their focus from food accessibility to food safety, quality, and ethical and social dimensions that are of importance to them (FAO 2009; Viaene and Gellynck 1997; Botonaki et al. 2006). Consumers with continuous access to food expect the products they purchase to be safe, nutritious, inexpensive, and high in quality and consistency (Beekman 2008), and substantial portions can afford to scrutinize the methods by which food is produced.
A number of reasons beyond relative affluence underlie such changes in consumer interest. Aside from the increasingly global nature of food production and trade and...
- Bredahl, M. E., Northen, J. R., Boecker, A., & Normile, M. A. (2001). Consumer demand sparks the growth of quality assurance schemes in the European food sector. In A. Regmi (Ed.), Changing structures of global food consumption and trade, Agricultural and trade report no. WRS-01–1 (pp. 90–102). Washington, DC: USDA/Economic Research Service.Google Scholar
- Fraser, D. (2008). Understanding animal welfare: The science in its cultural context. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Fraser, D., Weary, D. M., Pajor, E. A., & Milligan, B. N. (1997). A scientific conception of animal welfare that reflects ethical concerns. Animal Welfare, 6, 187–205.Google Scholar
- Harrison, R. (1964). Animal machines: The new factory farming industry. London: Stuart.Google Scholar
- Mench, J. A. (2003). Assessing animal welfare at the farm and group level: A United States perspective. Animal Welfare, 12, 493–503.Google Scholar
- Mench, J. A., James, H., Pajor, E. A., & Thompson, P. B. (2008). The welfare of animals in concentrated feeding operations. In Report to the Pew Commission on industrial farm animal production.Google Scholar
- OIE. (2005). Terrestrial animal health code. Paris: World Organization for Animal Health (OIE).Google Scholar
- Olynk, N. J., Tonsor, G. T., & Wolf, C. A. (2010). Consumer willingness to pay for livestock credence attribute claim verification. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 35, 261–280.Google Scholar
- Raab, C., & Grobe, D. (2005). Consumer knowledge and perceptions about organic food. The Journal of Extension, 43(4), 4RIB3.Google Scholar
- Rocourt, J., Moy, G., Vierk, K., & Schlundt, J. (2003). The present state of foodborne disease in OECD countries food safety department. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
- Rollin, B. E. (1995). Farm animal welfare: Social, bioethical and research issues. Ames: Iowa University Press.Google Scholar
- Scruton, R. (2004). The conscientious carnivore. In S. F. Sapontzis (Ed.), Food for thought: The debate over eating meat (pp. 81–107). Amherst: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
- Singer, P., & Mason, J. (2006). The ethics of what we eat: Why our food choices matter. Emmaus: Rodale.Google Scholar
- Thompson, P. B. (2008). The ethics of intensification: Agricultural development and cultural change (The international library of environmental, agricultural and food ethics). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Thompson, D. (2013). Cheap eats: How America spends money on food. http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2013/03/cheap-eats-how-america-spends-money-onfood/273811/. Accessed 22 Mar 2013.
- Tonsor, G. T., Mintert, J. R., & Schroeder, T. C. (2010). US Meat demand: Household dynamics and media information impacts. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 35, 1–17.Google Scholar
- Wright, W., & Middendorf, G. (Eds.). (2008). The fight over food: Producers, consumers, and activists challenge the global food system. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar