Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy

Living Edition
| Editors: Henrik Lagerlund

Atomism

  • Aurélien Robert
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_58-2

Abstract

At first sight, the philosophical idea that the world is composed of atoms, notably embraced by Greek and Roman authors such as Democritus, Epicurus, and Lucretius, seemed to have disappeared during the middle ages. It has been frequently said that it only reappeared during the Renaissance and then in modern philosophy and chemistry. In fact, atomism never ceased to exist as a theory of matter, space and time, both in western Latin tradition and in the Arabic and Jewish medieval philosophy. Different versions of atomism were developed in these traditions: from theological explanations of creation to pure mathematical theories about the divisibility of the continuum, through physical theories of matter and time. The first detailed accounts of atomism come from the ninth- and tenth-century Arabic theologians of Baghdad and Basra, immediately followed by the Jewish schools, notably in Egypt. A similar revival of atomism appeared in the West from the twelfth-century philosophers of Chartres to the fourteenth-century Christian theologians of Oxford and Paris. Most of these medieval atomist theories have very little in common with ancient atomism, for they are usually linked with more complicated theological concerns, such as the eternity of the world, creation, the existence of prime matter, and more generally the finiteness of created things. On the other hand, they are similar to Platonic and neo-Pythagorean conceptions of reality as constituted from units and numbers, or from atoms and collections of atoms, which are equivalent to units in matter and space.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

Secondary Sources

  1. De Boer, S. W. (2009). The importance of atomism in the philosophy of Gerard of Odo (OFM). In A. Robert & C. Grellard (Eds.), Atomism in late medieval philosophy and theology (pp. 85–106). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  2. Dhanani, A. (1994). The physical theory of Kalam. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  3. Grellard, C. (2004). Les présupposés méthodologiques de l’atomisme: la théorie du continu chez Nicolas d’Autrécourt et Nicolas Bonet. In C. Grellard (Ed.), Méthodes et statut des sciences à la fin du moyen âge (pp. 181–199). Lille: Presses du septentrion.Google Scholar
  4. Grellard, C. (2009). Nicolas of Autrecourt’s atomistic physics. In A. Robert & C. Grellard (Eds.), Atomism in late medieval philosophy and theology (pp. 107–126). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  5. King, P. (2004). The metaphysics of Peter Abelard. In Cambridge companion to Peter Abelard (pp. 65–125). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kretzmann, N. (1986). Continua, indivisibles, and change in Wyclif’s logic of scripture. In A. Kenny (Ed.), Wyclif in his times (pp. 31–66). Oxford: Calrendon Press.Google Scholar
  7. Lasswitz, K. (1890). Geschichte der Atomistik vom Mittelalter bis Newton. Hamburg: Leopold Voss.Google Scholar
  8. Lewis, N. (2005). Robert Grosseteste and the continuum. In L. Honnefelder, R. Wood, M. Dreyer, & M.-A. Aris (Eds.), Albertus Magnus and the beginnings of the medieval reception of Aristotle in the Latin west (pp. 159–187). Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
  9. Mabilleau, L. (1895). Histoire de la philosophie atomistique. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
  10. Maier, A. (1949). Kontinuum, Minimum und aktuell Unendliches. In Die Vorläufer Galileis im 14. Jahrhundert (pp. 155–215). Roma: Edizioni di storia e letteratura.Google Scholar
  11. Michael, E. (2009). John Wiclif’s atomism. In A. Robert & C. Grellard (Eds.), Atomism in late medieval philosophy and theology (pp. 183–220). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  12. Murdoch, J. E. (1964). Superposition, congruence and continuity in the Middle Ages. In L’aventure de la science, Mélanges Alexandre Koyré (Vol. I, pp. 416–441). Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
  13. Murdoch, J. E. (1969). Mathesis in philosophiam scholasticam introducta: The rise and development of the application of mathematics in fourteenth century philosophy and theology. In Arts libéraux et philosophie au moyen âge (pp. 238–246). Montréal/Paris: Institut d'études médiévales.Google Scholar
  14. Murdoch, J. E. (1974). Naissance et développement de l’atomisme au bas Moyen Âge latin. In G. H. Allard et al. (Eds.), La science de la nature: théories et pratiques (pp. 11–32). Montréal: Bellarmin.Google Scholar
  15. Murdoch, J. E. (1981). Henry of Harclay and the infinite. In A. Maierù et al. (Eds.), Studi sul XIV secolo in memoria di Anneliese Maier (pp. 219–261). Rome: Edizioni Storia e Letterattura.Google Scholar
  16. Murdoch, J. E. (1982). Infinity and continuity. In N. Kretzmann et al. (Eds.), The Cambridge history of later medieval philosophy (pp. 564–591). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Murdoch, J. E. (1984). Atomism and motion in the fourteenth century. In E. Mendelsohn (Ed.), Transformation and tradition in the sciences. Essays in honor of I. Bernard Cohen (pp. 45–66). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Pabst, B. (1994). Atomentheorien des lateinischen Mittelalters. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
  19. Philippe, J. (1895). Lucrèce dans la théologie chrétienne du IIIe au XIIIe siècles. Revue de l’Histoire des Religions, 32, 284–302.Google Scholar
  20. Philippe, J. (1896). Lucrèce dans la théologie chrétienne du IIIe au XIIIe siècles. Revue de l’Histoire des Religions, 33, 19–36, 125–162.Google Scholar
  21. Pines, S. (1936). Beiträge zur islamischen Atomenlehre. Berlin: A. Heine.Google Scholar
  22. Pyle, A. (1997). Atomism and its critics. From Democritus to Newton. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
  23. Rashed, M. (2005). Natural philosophy. In P. Adamson et al. (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Arabic philosophy (pp. 287–307). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Robert, A. (2009). William Crathorn’s mereotopological atomism. In A. Robert & C. Grellard (Eds.), Atomism in late medieval philosophy and theology (pp. 127–162). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  25. Robert, A. (2017). Atomisme pythagoricien et espace géométrique au Moyen Âge. In T. Suarez-Nani, O. Ribordy, & A. Petagine (Eds.), Lieu, espace, mouvement: physique, métaphysique et cosmologie (XIIe-XVIe siècles) (pp. 181–206). Turnhout: Brepols.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Robert, A., & Grellard, C. (Eds.). (2009). Atomism in late medieval philosophy and theology. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  27. Rudavsky, T. M. (2000). Time matters. Time, creation and cosmology in medieval Jewish philosophy. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  28. Trifogli, C. (2002). Matter and form in thirteenth century, discussions of infinity and continuity. In C. Leijenhorst et al. (Eds.), The dynamics of Aristotelian natural philosophy (pp. 169–187). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  29. Wolfson, A. H. (1946). Atomism in Saadia. The Jewish Quarterly Review, 37(2), 107–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wolfson, A. H. (1976). The philosophy of the Kalam. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Zonta, M. (2002). La filosofia ebraica medievale. Storia e testi. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
  32. Zoubov, V. P. (1959). Walter Catton, Gérard d’Odon et Nicolas Bonet. Physis: rivista di storia della scienza, 1, 261–278.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre d’Etudes Supérieures de la Renaissance (CNRS)ToursFrance