Abstract
The Empire and the papacy represented the unity of Latin Christendom. As secular head of Christianity the emperor did not enjoy the same stability in his position of leadership as the pope. An emperor only held office for roughly half the years elapsed between 962 and 1493, as long vacancies interrupted the chain of emperors. Moreover, the concept of Empire was in constant flux. Contrary to the papacy, which was defined by a corpus of canonical laws and conciliar decrees, the Empire was shaped by collective memory and by individual interpretation. The concept of Empire varied according to the knowledge held of the Empire of antiquity. Some authors characterized the office of emperor as an exclusively secular authority which had been established by Augustus. Others emphasized the Christian duties of the emperor, referring to the famous penance of the emperor Theodosius I in front of Ambrose of Milan. In Rome, the concept of the emperor as head of the city itself had never truly died out. Equally, a king was referred to as emperor in Spain and in England, if he dominated other kings in his region. Yet, in spite of this erratic concept of Empire, it inspired a philosophical discussion about the necessity of a political world order. This discussion emerged in the late Middle Ages and anticipated early modern theories about supranational institutions and the deficiency of nation-states.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Bibliography
Primary Sources
Dante. (1998). Monarchia (ed.: Kay, R. Studies and texts, 131). Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.
Engelbert of Admont. (2000). De ortu et fine Romani imperii. Three tracts on empire. Engelbert of Admont, Aeneas Silvius Piccolomini and Juan de Torquemada (ed.: Izbicki, ThM., Nederman, C. J.). Bristol/Sterling: Thoemmes.
Engelbert of Admont. (2014). De ortu et fine Romani imperii (1, 3 vols.; ed.: Schneider, H.). MGH Staatsschriften. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Konrad of Megenberg. (1914). De translacione Romani imperii. In R. Scholz (Ed.), Unbekannte kirchenpolitische Streitschriften aus der Zeit Ludwigs des Bayern (1327–1354) (Vol. 2, pp. 249–345). Rom: Loescher.
Lupold of Bebenburg. (2004). Politische Schriften des Lupold von Bebenburg (4 vol.; ed.: Miethke, J., Flueler, C.). MGH Staatsschriften. Hannover: Hahnsche Buchhandlung.
Marsilius of Padua. (1993). Writings on the empire: Defensor minor and De translatione imperii (ed.: Nederman, C. J.). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nicholas of Cusa. (1996). De concordantia catholica (ed.: Sigmund, P. E.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Peter of Andlau. (1998). Libellus de caesarea monarchia (ed.: Müller, R. A.). Frankfurt: Insel.
Piccolomini Aeneas Silivus. (2000). De ortu et auctoritate Romani imperii. Three tracts on empire. Engelbert of Admont, Aeneas Silvius Piccolomini and Juan de Torquemada (ed.: Izbicki, ThM., Nederman, C. J.). Bristol/Sterling: Thoemmes.
Roselli Antonio. (1612). Monarchia. In M. Goldast & S. Monarchia (Eds.), Romani imperii (Vol. 1, pp. 252–556). Hannover: Biermann.
William of Ockham. (1956/1963/1974/1997). Opera politica (1–4 vols.; ed.: Offler, H. S.). Manchester (1956/1963/1974)/Oxford (1997): Manchester University Press/Oxford University Press.
Secondary Sources
Burns, J. H. (1992). Lordship, kingship and empire. The idea of monarchy, 1400–1525. Oxford: Clarendon.
Briguglia, G. (2013). Marsilio da Padova. Rome: Caroccci.
Cheneval, F. (2002). Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Bedeutung. Über die Entstehung und die philosophischen Grundlagen des supranationalen Denkens der Moderne. Basel: Schwabe.
Davis, C. T. (1957). Dante and the idea of Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hageneder, O. (1985). Weltherrschaft im Mittelalter. Mitteilungen des Instituts für Österreichische Geschichtsforschung, 93, 257–278.
Heidemann, M. (2008). Heinrich VII. (1308–1313). Kaiseridee im Spannungsfeld von staufischer Universalherrschaft und frühneuzeitlicher Partikularautonomie. Warendorf: Fahlbusch.
Jones, C. (2007). Eclipse of empire? Perceptions of the western empire and its rulers in late-medieval France. Turnhout: Brepols.
Kneupper, F. C. (2016). The empire at the end of time. Identity and reform in late medieval German prophecy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McCready, W. D. (1974). The problem of empire in Augustinus Triumphus and late medieval papal hierocratic theory. Traditio, 30, 325–349.
McGrade, A. S. (1974). The political thought of William of Ockham. Personal and institutional principles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nederman, C. (1995). From Defensor pacis to Defensor minor: The problem of empire in Marsiglio of Padua. History of Political Thought, 16, 313–329.
Nederman, C. (2005). Empire and the historiography of European political thought: Marsiglio of Padua, Nicholas of Cusa, and the medieval/modern divide. Journal of the History of Ideas, 66, 1–15.
Pennington, K. (1993). The prince and the law, 1200–1600: Sovereignty and rights in the western legal tradition. Berkeley/Oxford: University of California Press.
Post, G. (1964). Studies in medieval legal thought. Public law and the state 1100–1323. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Scales, L. (2001). Monarchy and German identity in the later Middle Ages. Bulletin of the John Rylands University Library of Manchester, 83, 167–200.
Scales, L. (2012). The shaping of German identity. Authority and crisis, 1245–1414. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shogimen, T. (2007). Ockham and political discourse in the late Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ubl, K. (2006). Die Rechte des Kaisers in der Theorie deutscher Gelehrter des 14. Jahrhunderts (Engelbert von Admont, Lupold von Bebenburg, Konrad von Megenberg). In C. Märtl (Ed.), Konrad von Megenberg (1309–1374). Das Wissen der Zeit (pp. 353–387). München: C.H. Beck.
Walther, H. G. (2003). Das Reich in der politischen Theorie der Legistik und im Umkreis der päpstlichen Kurie. In M. Werner (Ed.), Heinrich Raspe – Landgraf von Thüringen und römischer König (1227–1247). Fürsten, König und Reich in spätstaufischer Zeit (pp. 29–52). Frankfurt: Lang.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature B.V.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Ubl, K. (2019). Roman Empire. In: Lagerlund, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_452-2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_452-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1151-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1151-5
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities