Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy

Living Edition
| Editors: Henrik Lagerlund

Metaphysics

  • Andrew W. Arlig
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_331-2

Abstract

This entry surveys some of the major issues in medieval metaphysics. It examines at length medieval positions on the nature and scope of metaphysics, especially in relation to theology. This entry then briefly surveys some of the major topics that exercised the minds of medieval thinkers, including the transcendentals, the categories, existence, universals, ontological reduction, individuation, material constitution, identity, persistence, and modality.

In the collection of books known as the Metaphysics, Aristotle provided several characterizations of this science. In book I (A), Aristotle claimed that the fruit of the highest philosophical investigation is a “wisdom” concerning the first causes and principles of things. In book IV (Γ), Aristotle claimed that metaphysics is the study of being in so far as it is being (chapter 1), but given that all beings ultimately depend upon substance for their existence, metaphysics is primarily a study of substance (chapter 2). Finally, in book VI (Ε), Aristotle itemized the subject matters of the three theoretical sciences, which are marked off from the practical and productive sciences in virtue of the fact that the former are pursued for their own sake. The theoretical sciences are divided into natural science (“physics”), mathematics, and the “divine” science, or theology. Physics considered things insofar as they are changeable and inseparable from matter. Mathematics considered things, which are actually inseparable from matter, in abstraction from their matter and from change. Theology, however, considered things that exist separately from matter and are not subject to change. Aristotle noted that if there were only natural things, physics would be the first philosophical science. But given that there are eternal, immaterial substances, there must be a higher science that studies these. Hence, metaphysics comes after the study of physics. For the Aristotelian, one does not have complete knowledge of a science until one knows the causes and principles of the subjects of that science. In this sense, metaphysics is prior to physics. For these reasons, metaphysics is the first philosophical science.

While medieval philosophers were more than happy to parrot these Aristotelian formulae, there was considerable debate over the proper “subject” of metaphysics. For it is one thing to consider the x’s in a science, it is another matter for the science to have the x’s as its primary object of study. For example, one may have to consider substance in physics, but substance as such is not the subject matter of physics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

Primary Sources

  1. Anselm. (1946). In F. S. Schmidt (Ed.), Opera Omnia. Thomas Nelson: Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  2. Averroes. (1562–1574). Latin translations of his commentaries in Aristotelis Opera cum Averrois commentariis, apud Junctas, Venice (repr. Frankfurt a.Main: Minerva, 1962).Google Scholar
  3. Averroes. (1938–1952). In M. Bouyges (Ed.), Tafsir ma ba‘d at-tabi‘iyat, 3 vols. Imprimerie Catholique, Beirut. English translation of the commentary on Book XII (Λ): Charles, G. (1986). Ibn Rushd’s metaphysics: a translation with introduction of Averroes’s commentary on Aristotle’s metaphysics, Book Lam. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  4. Avicenna. (1977/1980). In Van S. Riet (Ed.), Liber de philosophia prima sive scientia divina (Latin translation of the metaphysics of “the healing”) (2 vols). Louvain/Leiden: Peeters/Brill.Google Scholar
  5. Avicenna. (2005). In M. E. Marmura (Ed. and Trans.), The metaphysics of “the healing” (Arabic text with English translation). Provo: Brigham Young University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Boethius. (1877/1880). In C. Meiser (Ed.), Commentarii in librum Aristotelis Peri Hermeneias. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
  7. Boethius. (1891). In Categorias Aristotelis libri quatuor. In J. P. Migne, et al. (Eds.), Opera (Patrologiae cursus completas, series latina, Vol. 64). Paris: Migne.Google Scholar
  8. Boethius. (1998). In J. Magee (Ed. and Trans.), De divisione liber: Critical edition, translation, prolegomena, and commentary. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  9. Boethius. (2000). In C. Moreschini (Ed.), De consolatione philosophiae/Opscula theologica. Munich/Leipzig: Saur.Google Scholar
  10. Duns Scotus, John. (1966). Tractatus de primo principio. In A. B. Wolter (Ed. and Trans.), A treatise on God as first principle. Chicago: Franciscan Herald Press.Google Scholar
  11. Duns Scotus, John (1987). Philosophical writings (trans: Wolter, A.). Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  12. Duns Scotus, John (1997). Quaestiones super libros metaphysicorum Aristotelis, books I–IX, B. Ioannis Duns Scoti opera philosophica, vols 3/4. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
  13. McGinnis, John & Reisman David, C. (Eds. and Trans.) (2007). Classical Arabic philosophy: An anthology of sources. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  14. Abelard, Peter (1919). Logica ‘ingredientibus’, pt. 1: Glossae super Porphyrium. In B. Geyer (Ed.), Peter Abaelards Philosophische Schriften. I. Die Logica ‘Ingredientibus. 1: die Glossen zu Porphyrius. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters 21, pt 1. Münster: Aschendorffshen Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
  15. Abelard, Peter (1921). Logica ‘ingredientibus’, pt. 2: Glossae super Praedicamenta Aristotelis. In B. Geyer (Ed.), Peter Abaelards Philosophische Schriften. I. Die Logica ‘Ingredientibus’. 2: die Glossen zu den Kategorien, Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters 21, pt 2. Münster: Aschendorffshen Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
  16. Abelard, Peter (1969). Theologia Christiana. In E. M. Buytaert (Ed.), Petri Abaelardi Opera theologica II. Corpus Christianorum Continuatio Mediaevalis 12. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
  17. Damien, Peter (1972). De divina omnipotentia. In: A. Cantin (Ed. and Trans.), Lettre sur la Toute-Puissance Divine. Sources Chrétiennes 191. Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf.Google Scholar
  18. Abelard, Peter (1987). Theologia “Scholarium”. In E. M. Buytaert & C. J. Mews (Eds.), Petri Abaelardi opera theologica III. Corpus Christianorum Continuatio Mediaevalis 13. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
  19. Spade, P. V. (Ed. and Trans.) (1994). Five texts on the mediaeval problem of universals. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  20. Aquinas, Thomas (1882). Opera omnia. Iussu impensaque LeonisXIII, P.M. edita, Leonine edition. Vatican: Vatican Polyglot Press.Google Scholar
  21. Aquinas, Thomas (1971). In M. R. Cathala & R. M. Spiazzi (Eds.), In duodecim libros metaphysicorum Aristotelis expositio (2nd ed.). Turin/Rome: Marietti. English translation: Thomas, A. (1961). Commentary on the metaphysics of Aristotle (trans: Rowan, J. P.), 2 vols. Chicago: Henry Regnery.Google Scholar
  22. William of Ockham. (1967–1986). In G. Gál et al. (Eds.), Opera theologica. St. Bonaventure: Franciscan Institute.Google Scholar
  23. William of Ockham. (1974–1988). In G. Gál et al. (Eds.), Opera philosophica. St. Bonaventure: Franciscan Institute.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

  1. Adams, M. M. (1987). William Ockham (2 vols). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  2. Cross, R. (1995). Duns Scotus’s anti-reductionistic account of material substance. Vivarium, 33, 137–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dumont, S. D. (1992). Transcendental being: Scotus and Scotists (Topos: The transcendentals in the Middle Ages, Gracia JJE (ed)). Topoi, 11, 135–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Erismann, C. (2011). L’homme commun: La genèse du réalisme ontologique durant le haut Moyen Âge. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  5. Fakhry, M. (1984). The subject-matter of metaphysics: Aristotle and Ibn Sina (Avicenna). In M. E. Marmura (Ed.), Islamic theology and philosophy: Studies in honor of George F. Hourani (pp. 137–147). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  6. Galluzzo, G. (2013). The medieval reception of book zeta of Aristotle’s metaphysics. Vol. 1: Aristotle’s ontology in the Middle Ages. Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
  7. Gracia, J. J. E. (1984). Introduction to the problem of individuation in the early Middle Ages. Munich: Philosophia.Google Scholar
  8. Gracia, J. J. E. (1992). The transcendentals in the Middle Ages: An introduction (Topos: The transcendentals in the Middle Ages, Gracia JJE (ed)). Topoi, 11, 113–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gracia, J. J. E. (Ed.). (1994). Individuation in scholasticism: The later Middle Ages and the counter-reformation, 1150–1650. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  10. Henry, D. P. (1991). Medieval mereology. Amsterdam: B.R. Grüner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. King, P. (2000). The problem of individuation in the Middle Ages. Theoria, 66, 159–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. King, P. (2004). Metaphysics. In J. Brower & K. Guilfoy (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Abelard (pp. 65–125). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Knuuttila, S. (1981). Time and modality in scholasticism. In S. Knuuttila (Ed.), Reforging the great chain of being: Studies of the history of modal theories (pp. 163–257). Dordrecht/Boston: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Knuuttila, S. (1993). Modalities in medieval philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Marenbon, J. (2013). Abelard in four dimensions: A twelfth-century philosopher in his context and ours. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  16. Normore, C. (1985). Buridan’s ontology. In J. Bogen & J. F. McGuire (Eds.), How things are: Studies in predication and the history of philosophy and science (pp. 189–203). Dordrecht/Boston: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Normore, C. (2003). Duns Scotus’s modal theory. In T. Williams (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Duns Scotus (pp. 129–160). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Normore, C. (2006). Ockham’s metaphysics of parts. Journal of Philosophy, 103, 737–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pasnau, R. (2011). Metaphysical themes, 1274–1671. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pini, G. (2005). Scotus’s realist conception of the categories: His legacy to the late medieval debates. Vivarium, 43, 63–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Serene, E. (1981). Anselm’s modal conceptions. In S. Knuuttila (Ed.), Reforging the great chain of being: Studies of the history of modal theories (pp. 117–162). Dordrecht/Boston: Reidel.Google Scholar
  22. Spade, P. V. (1999). Ockham’s nominalist metaphysics: Some main themes. In P. V. Spade (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Ockham (pp. 100–117). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tweedale, M. (1976). Abailard on universals. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  24. Wippel, J. F. (1981). The metaphysical thought of Godfrey of Fontaines: A study in late thirteenth-century philosophy. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
  25. Wippel, J. F. (2000). The metaphysical thought of Thomas Aquinas: From finite being to uncreated being. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew W. Arlig
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyBrooklyn College of The City University of New YorkBrooklynUSA