Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions

Living Edition
| Editors: Pedro Teixeira (Editor-in-Chief), Jung Cheol Shin (Editor-in-Chief)

Human Capital Policy in Science and Technology

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_260-1



Human capital is the productive wealth embodied in labor, skills, and knowledge of science and technology. The terminology for policies covering human capital policy varies in countries. They are often called science and technology policy, research and innovation policy, or higher education, science, and innovation policy. Common for all is that they include set of beliefs and practices designed and implemented to stimulate the production of scientific and technological knowledge in order to realize the ideal of progress and welfare in countries.

Globalization and Accountability of Public Investments in Science and Technology

Over the past three decades, the policy map directing science and technology has...


Human Capital Policies Human Capital Development Strategy Long-term Economic Success Innovation Policy Entrepreneurship Education 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Ahn, Soon Il. 1995. A new program in cooperative research between academia and industry in Korea, involving Centers of Excellence. Technovation 15 (4): 241–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Edquist, Charles, and Maureen McKelvey. 1998. High R&D intensity without high tech products: A Swedish paradox? In Institutions and economic change: New perspectives on markets, firms and technology, ed. Nielsen Klaus and Björn Johnson, 6–18. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Ejermo Olot, Kander Astrid, and Svensson Henning Martin. 2011. The R&D-growth paradox arises in fast-growing sectors. Reserch Policy 40:664–672.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.03.004
  4. Gajendra Nadarajah, Ranjit. 2014. Transnational research collaboration: Foresight and holistic solutions? Research Digest 5, International Education Association of Australia. Available via International Education Association of Australia. http://www.ieaa.org.au/documents/item/311.
  5. Godin, Benoît. 2006. The linear model of innovation: The historical construction of an analytical framework. Science, Technology & Human Values 31 (6): 639–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Grubel, Herbert, and Anthony Scott. 1966. The international flow of human capital. American Economic Review 56 (1/2): 268–274.Google Scholar
  7. Guston, David H., and Kenneth Kenniston. 1994. The fragile contract: University science and the federal government, 1–24. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.405015022.Google Scholar
  8. Hay, Collin. 2004. Re-stating politics, re-politicising the state: Neo-liberalism, economic imperatives and the rise of the competition state. Political Quarterly 75 (1): 38–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hirsch, Joachim. 1991. From the Fordist to the post-Fordist state. In The politics of flexibility: Restructuring state and industry in Britain, Germany and Scandinavia, ed. Bob Jessop, 307–333. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  10. Hood, Christopher. 2002. The risk game and the blame game. Government and Opposition 37 (1): 15–37.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-7053.00085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hsu, Po-Hsuan, J. Shyu, et al. 2003. Exploring the interaction between incubators and industrial clusters: The case of the ITRI incubator in Taiwan. R&D Management 33 (1): 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jasanoff, Sheila. 1997. Civilization and madness: The great BSE scare of 1996. Public Understanding of Science 6 (3): 221–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Olsson, Åsa, and Natalie, Cooke. 2013. The evolving path for strengthening research and innovation policy for development. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Available via OECD. http://www.oecd.org/sti/The%20Evolving%20Path%20for%20Strengthening%20Research%20and%20Innovation%20Policy%20for%20Development-%20Asa%20Olsson%20and%20Natalie%20Cooke.pdf.
  14. Romer, Paul M. 2001. Should the government subsidize supply or demand in the market for scientists and engineers? Innovation Policy and the Economy 1: 221–252. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LH Martin Institute for Higher Education Leadership and Management, Centre for the Study of Higher EducationThe University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Hans De Wit
    • 1
  • Laura Rumbley
    • 2
  • Fiona Hunter
    • 3
  • Lisa Unangst
    • 4
  • Edward Choi
    • 5
  1. 1.Center for International Higher EducationBoston CollegeBostonUSA
  2. 2.Center for International Higher EducationBoston CollegeChestnut HillUSA
  3. 3.Centre for Higher Education InternationalisationUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreMilanoItaly
  4. 4.Center for International Higher EducationBoston CollegeChestnut HillU.S.A.
  5. 5.Center for International Higher EducationBoston CollegeChestnut HillU.S.A.