Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy

Living Edition
| Editors: Mortimer Sellers, Stephan Kirste

Transitional Justice

  • Emilio Peluso Neder MeyerEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_576-1

Introduction

This entry aims to present the core of the notion of transitional justice, which is a transdisciplinary idea that cannot be reduced to the contours of jurisprudence. As such, it is a concept originating from the relationship between academic investigations and the engagement of researchers in state policies. Exploring these links, the entry encompasses a historical background, an attempt to shape the concept of transitional justice, some of the critical approaches to the theme based on the universal claims of the concept and new developments in the field related to the crises of democracy. Finally, the conclusion will detail the importance of making effective transitional justice taking into consideration not only the criticism the concept must address but also the current challenges posed by a growing wave of authoritarianism around the globe.

Historical Background

Paige Arthur (2009) tries to recover the definition of an autonomous field of transitional justice when she...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abrão P, Torelly M (2012) Resistance to change: Brazil’s persistent amnesty and its alternatives for truth and justice. In: Lessa F, Payne LA (eds) Amnesty in the age of human rights accountability: comparative and international perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 152–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arthur P (2009) How transitions reshaped human rights: a conceptual history of transitional justice. Hum Rts Q 31:321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown W (2015) Undoing the demos: neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. Zone Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Daly TG (2019) Democratic decay: conceptualising an emerging research field. Hague J Rule Law 11(1):1–28. https://link.springer.com/journal/40803/11/1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Diamond L (2015) Facing up to the democratic recession. J Democr 26(1):141–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dresden JR, Howard MM (2016) Authoritarian backsliding and the concentration of political power. Democratization 23(7):1122–1143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Elster J (2004) Closing the books: transitional justice in historical perspective. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Evans M (2016) Structural violence, socioeconomic rights, and transformative justice. J Hum Rights 15(1):1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fukuyama F (2006) The end of history and the last man. Simon and Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Ginsburg T, Huq A (2018) How to save a constitutional democracy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, p 2018Google Scholar
  11. González-Ocantos EA (2016) Shifting legal visions: judicial change and human rights trials in Latin America. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Halmai G (2018) A coup against constitutional democracy. In: Graber MA, Levinson S, Tushnet M (eds) Constitutional democracy in crisis? Oxford University Press, New York, pp 243–275Google Scholar
  13. Hayner PB (2002) Unspeakable truths: confronting state terror and atrocity. Routledge, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kritz NJ (1995) Transitional justice: how emerging democracies reckon with former regimes. US Institute of Peace Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  15. Meyer EPN (2018) Judges and courts destabilizing constitutionalism: the Brazilian judiciary branch’s political and authoritarian character. German Law J 19(4):727–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mounk Y (2018) The people vs. democracy: why our freedom is in danger and how to save it. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA/LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nagy R (2008) Transitional justice as global project: critical reflections. Third World Q 29(2):275–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. O’Donnell G, Schmitter PC (2013) Transitions from authoritarian rule: tentative conclusions about uncertain democracies. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  19. Stanley J (2018) How Fascism Works: the politics of us and them. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Teitel RG (2000) Transitional justice. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Teitel RG (2003) Transitional justice genealogy. Harv Hum Rts J 16:69Google Scholar
  22. Vinck P (2019) Transitional justice in the age of social media. Int J Transit Justice 13(1):105–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG) and Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)Belo HorizonteBrazil

Section editors and affiliations

  • Marcelo Galuppo
    • 1
  • Vitor Medrado
    • 2
  1. 1.College of LawFederal University of Minas GeraisBelo HorizonteBrazil
  2. 2.Pontifical Catholic University of Minas GeraisBelo HorizonteBrazil