Skip to main content

Harrington James

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy
  • 65 Accesses

Introduction

The English Revolution (1640–1660) prompted new thinking about legal and constitutional matters, but also about political institutions and practices. The execution of King Charles I on 30 January 1649, and the subsequent establishment of the “Commonwealth and Free State,” forced thinkers in England and beyond to reassess commonly accepted notions, such as the divine right of kings, the ancient English constitution, and the location of sovereign power. Various thinkers developed theories to explain the situation, offered justifications for the new regime, and even proposed novel institutions of their own.

James Harrington (1611–1677) was particularly influential in this regard. His major work – The Commonwealth of Oceana(1656) – explained why a commonwealth was theoretically the best form of government; demonstrated why that form was the most appropriate for England in the mid-1650s – and, in doing so, offered an historical explanation for the outbreak of the Civil War;...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Davis JC (2018) James Harrington and the rule of king people. In: Márquez X (ed) Democratic moments: reading democratic texts. Bloomsbury, London, pp 65–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Foxley R (2013) Democracy in 1659: Harrington and the good old cause. In: Taylor S, Tapsell G (eds) The nature of the english revolution revisited: essays in honour of John Morrill. Boydell and Brewer, Woodbridge, pp 175–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldie M (1987) The civil religion of James Harrington. In: Pagden A (ed) The languages of political theory in early modern Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 197–222

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley R (2005a) French revolutionaries and English republicans: the Cordeliers Club, 1790–1794. Boydell and Brewer, Woodbridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley R (2005b) From constitution-builders to radical democrats: neo-Harringtonians in eighteenth-century America and France. In: Cope KL (ed) 1650–1850: ideas, aesthetics, and inquiries in the early modern era, vol 2, pp 315–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley R (2010) The English republican tradition and eighteenth-century France: between the ancients and the moderns. Manchester University Press, Manchester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley R (2013) Rethinking the political thought of James Harrington: royalism, republicanism and democracy. Hist Eur Ideas 39:354–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington J (1977) In: Pocock JGA (ed) The political works of James Harrington. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel Hammersley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature B.V.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Hammersley, R. (2019). Harrington James. In: Sellers, M., Kirste, S. (eds) Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_426-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_426-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6730-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6730-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Law and CriminologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics