Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy

Living Edition
| Editors: Mortimer Sellers, Stephan Kirste

Finnis, John

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_386-1

Introduction

John Mitchell Finnis (1940-present) is a Catholic legal philosopher specialized in philosophy of law and ethics. He has notably contributed to New Natural Law theory, which is grounded on the thought of St. Thomas Aquinas. Finnis has written extensively on jurisprudence, philosophy, law, theology, and history.

Finnis is a Professor of Law at the University of Notre Dame (South Bend, IN), and in 2010 he became an Emeritus Professor of law at University College, Oxford. He married Marie C. McNally in 1964, has 6 children, and is a dual citizen of Australia (from birth) and the United Kingdom (2004).

Education and Career

Finnis attended St. Peter’s College, Adelaide (1947–1957) and Adelaide University (1958–1961). In 1962, he won the Rhodes scholarship at University College, Oxford (1962–1965) where he completed his D. Phil with a doctoral thesis on the concept of judicial power, titled “The Idea of Judicial Power, with special reference to Australian federal constitutional...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Boyle J (1999) The absolute prohibition of lying and the origins of the casuistry of mental reservation: Augustinian arguments and Thomistic developments. Am J Jurisprud 44:43–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Finnis J (1980) Natural law and natural rights. The Clarendon Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Finnis J (1991) Moral absolutes: tradition, revision, and truth. Catholic University of America Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  4. Finnis J (1995) Law, morality, and ‘sexual orientation. Notre Dame J Law Ethics Pub Pol 9:11–39Google Scholar
  5. Finnis J (1997) Is natural law theory compatible with limited government? In: George RP (ed) Natural law, liberalism, and morality. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–26Google Scholar
  6. Finnis J (1998) Aquinas: moral, political, and legal theory. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Finnis J (2013) The collected essays of John Finnis, vol I-V. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Finnis, John, Joseph Boyle, Germain Grisez. Nuclear deterrence, morality and realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987Google Scholar
  9. Finnis J, Grisez G, Boyle J (2001) ‘Direct’ and ‘indirect:’ a reply to critics of our action theory. Thomist 65:1–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. George RP (2001) The clash of orthodoxies: law, religion, and morality in crisis. ISI Books, WilmingtonGoogle Scholar
  11. George RP, Bradley GV (1995) Marriage and the liberal imagination. Georgetown Law Rev 84:301–320Google Scholar
  12. Grisez G (1965) The first principle of practical reason: a commentary on the Summa Theologiae, 1-2 question 94, article 2. Nat Law Forum 10:168–201Google Scholar
  13. Grisez G (1997) The way of our Lord Jesus Christ. Franciscan Press, QuincyGoogle Scholar
  14. Grisez G, Boyle J (1998) Response to our critics and our collaborators. In: George RP (ed) Natural law and moral inquiry: ethics, metaphysics, and politics in the work of Germain Grisez. Catholic University of America Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  15. Grisez G, Boyle J, Finnis J (1987) Practical principles, moral truth, and ultimate ends. Am J Jurisprud 32:99–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grisez G, Boyle J, Finnis J, May WE (1988) Every marital act ought to be open to new life: toward a clearer understanding. Thomist 52:365–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hittinger R (1987) A critique of the new natural law theory. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre DameGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee P (2005) The Human Body and Sexuality in the Teaching of Pope John Paul II, in John Paul II’s Contribution to Catholic Bioethics, ed. Christopher Tollefsen. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee P, George RP (2007) Body-self dualism in contemporary ethics and politics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Macedo S (1995) Homosexuality and the conservative mind. Georgetown Law J 84:261–300Google Scholar
  21. McCormick R (1984) Notes on moral theology: 1981 through 1984. University Press of America, LanhamGoogle Scholar
  22. McInerney R (1980) The principles of natural law. Am J Jurisprud 25:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Murphy M (2001) Natural law and practical rationality. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Murphy, Mark (2011) The natural law tradition in ethics. In: Edward N. Zalta (ed) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, winter 2011 edn. url = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2011/entries/natural-law-ethics/ Accessed 22 May 2017
  25. Smith J (1991) Humanae vitae: a generation later. The Catholic University of America Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  26. Tollefsen C (2007) Lying: the integrity approach. Am J Jurisprud 52:273–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tollefsen C (2008) The new natural law theory. Lyceum 10(1 (Fall 2008)):1–17Google Scholar
  28. Veach H (1990) Natural law and the ‘is-ought’ question: queries to Finnis and Grisez. In: Swimming against the current in contemporary philosophy. Catholic University of America Press, Washington, DC, pp 293–311Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Colorado-Colorado SpringsColorado SpringsUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Sally Scholz
    • 1
  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentVillanova UniversityVillanovaUSA