Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy

Living Edition
| Editors: Mortimer Sellers, Stephan Kirste

Jurisprudence as Normative Science

  • Nicoletta Bersier Ladavac
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_330-1

Introduction: Defining the Problem

Before defining what exactly jurisprudence as a normative science means it is necessary to clarify how the term “jurisprudence” will be understood in this entry. For reasons of space, we shall limit ourselves here to analyzing the concept of jurisprudence exclusively from the traditional viewpoint of Continental legal culture – where “jurisprudence” basically amounts to a general theory of positive law, to wit, of legal norms and legal orders (in this context we shall not consider the relationship among jurisprudence, sociology of law, and legal dogmatics) – and not according to the more sociological and pragmatic standpoint of the Anglo-American, Common Law legal culture. Nonetheless, there is an Anglophone approach to philosophy of law, to which only a brief reference will be made, represented by analytical jurisprudence, which engages in a conceptual analysis of the concept of law in the search for a general theory of law and corresponds, so far as...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Alexy R (1992) Begriff und Geltung des Rechts. Karl Alber, FreiburgGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexy R, Dreier R (1990) The concept of jurisprudence. Ratio Juris 3:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Coleman JL (2001) The practice of principle. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Dickinson J (2001) Evaluation and legal theory. Hart Publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Finnis J (1996) The truth in legal positivism. In: George RP (ed) The autonomy of law. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 195–214Google Scholar
  6. Green L (2001) Law and obligations. In: Coleman J, Shapiro S (eds) The Oxford handbook of jurisprudence and philosophy of law. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Hart HLA (1961) The concept of law. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Hart HLA (1983) Essays on jurisprudence and philosophy. Clarendon Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kelsen H (1941) The pure theory of law and analytical jurisprudence. Harvard Law Rev 55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kelsen H (1945) General theory of law and state, transl. A Wedberg. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  11. Kelsen H (1960) Reine Rechtslehre. Mit einem Anhang: Das Problem der Gerechtigkeit, 2nd edn. Franz Deuticke, WienGoogle Scholar
  12. Kelsen H (1967) The pure theory of law, transl. M Knight. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  13. Kelsen H (2015) In: Di Lucia P, Passerini Glazel L (eds) Cos’è la giustizia? Quodlibet, MacerataGoogle Scholar
  14. Kubeš V (1977) Grundfragen der Philosophie des Rechts. Springer, Wien/New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Postema GJ (1987) The normativity of law. In: Gavison R (ed) Issues of contemporary jurisprudence: the influence of H. L. A. Hart. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 81–104Google Scholar
  16. Raz J (1979) The authority of law. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Raz J (1980) The concept of a legal system, 2nd edn. Clarendon Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Raz J (1999) Practical reason and norms. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schauer F (1996) Positivism as pariah. In: George RP (ed) The autonomy of law. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  20. Schauer, Frederick. 2015: The force of law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Simpson AWB (ed) (1973) Essays in jurisprudence. Clarendon Press, OxordGoogle Scholar
  22. Spaak T (2003) Legal positivism, law’s normativity, and the normative force of legal justification. Ratio Juris 4:469–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stefano B, Pavlakos G (eds) (2011) New essays on the normativity of law. Hart Publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  24. Summers RS (1968) Essays in legal philosophy. Basil Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  25. von Wright GH (1963) Norm and action: a logical enquiry. Routledge & Kegan Paul, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Wacks R (2015) Understanding jurisprudence. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Waluchow W (1994) Inclusive legal positivism. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicoletta Bersier Ladavac
    • 1
  1. 1.Thémis, Centre d’Etudes de Philosophie du droit, de Sociologie du droit et de Théorie du droitGenevaSwitzerland

Section editors and affiliations

  • Pierluigi Chiassoni
    • 1
  1. 1.Università degli Studi di GenovaGenovaItaly