Introduction
On a very broad reading, the idea that law is an artifact can be understood in the sense that law is artificial in character. In this sense it roughly means that law is posited or positive law, law understood as the creation of human beings, the product of human actions, and not something occurring naturally. However, a growing interest in the theories of artifacts within general philosophy (analytic metaphysics in particular) at the end of the twentieth and the beginning of the twenty-first century (Lowe 1983; Hilpinen 1992, 1993, 2011; Dipert 1993; Thomasson 2003, 2007, 2009, 2014; Baker 2004, 2006, 2008, 2010; Elder 2007; Houkes and Vermaas 2009; Preston 2009, among others) and social ontological theories (especially Searle 1995, 2010; Tuomela 2002, 2007, 2013) prompted legal philosophers (both legal positivists and natural law theorists) to inquire into the ontological implications of the thesis that law is an artifact, i.e., to explicate, by using the conceptual...
References
Baker LR (2004) The ontology of artifacts. Philos Explor 7(2):99–112
Baker LR (2006) On the twofold nature of artefacts: a response to Wybo Houkes and Anthonie Meijers. Stud Hist Philos Sci 37:132–136
Baker LR (2008) The shrinking difference between artifacts and natural objects. Am Philos Assoc Newsl Philos Comput 07(2):2 http://people.umass.edu/lrb/files/bak08shrM.pdf
Baker LR (2010) Shrinking difference – response to replies. Am Philos Assoc Newsl Philos Comput 09(2):3–38 http://people.umass.edu/lrb/files/bak10shr.pdf
Burazin L (2015) Practical concepts of law as an artifact kind. Pravni vjesnik 31(3–4):65–75
Burazin L (2016) Can there be an artifact theory of law? Ratio Juris 29(3):385–401
Burazin L (2018) Legal systems as abstract institutional artifacts. In: Burazin L, Himma KE, Roversi C (eds) Law as an artifact. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 112–135
Crowe J (2014) Law as an artifact kind. Monash Univ Law Rev 40:737–757
Dipert RR (1993) Artifacts, art works, and agency. Temple University Press, Philadelphia
Dworkin R (1998 [1986]) Law’s empire. Hart Publishing, Oxford
Ehrenberg KM (2009) Defending the possibility of a neutral functional theory of law. Oxf J Leg Stud 29(1):91–113
Ehrenberg KM (2016) Functions of law. Oxford University Press, New York
Ehrenberg KM (2018) Law is an institution, an artifact, and a practice. In: Burazin L, Himma KE, Roversi C (eds) Law as an artifact. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 177–191
Elder CL (2007) On the place of artifacts in ontology. In: Margolis E, Laurence S (eds) Creations of the mind. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 33–51
Finnis J (2018) The nature of law. In: Tasioulas J (ed) Cambridge companion to philosophy of law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Gardner J (2004) The legality of law. Ratio Juris 17(2):168–181
Green L (2013) The morality in law. In: Duarte d’Almeida L, Edwards J, Dolcetti A (eds) Reading HLA Hart The concept of law. Hart Publishing, Oxford/Portland, pp 177–207
Hilpinen R (1992) On artifacts and works of art. Theoria 58(1):58–82
Hilpinen R (1993) Authors and artifacts. Proc Aristot Soc New Ser 93:155–178
Hilpinen R (2011) Artifact. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Standford encyclopedia of philosophy, Winter 2011 edn. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2011/entries/artifact/
Himma KE (2018) The Conceptual Function of Law: Law, Coercion, and Keeping the Peace. In: Burazin L, Himma KE, Roversi C (eds) Law as an artifact. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 136–159
Houkes W, Vermaas PE (2009) Artefacts in analytic metaphysics. Techné Res Philos Technol 13(2):74–81
Leiter B (2011) The demarcation problem in jurisprudence: a new case for scepticism. Oxf J Leg Stud 31(4): 663–677
Leiter B (2018) Legal positivism about the artifact law: a retrospective assessment. In: Burazin L, Himma KE, Roversi C (eds) Law as an artifact. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 3–28
Lowe EJ (1983) On the identity of artefacts. J Philos 80(4):220–232
Marmor A (2018) Law, fiction, and reality. In: Burazin L, Himma KE, Roversi C (eds) Law as an artifact. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 44–60
Murphy MC (2015) Two unhappy dilemmas for natural law jurisprudence. Am J Jurisprud 60(2):121–141
Preston B (2009) Philosophical theories of artefact function. In: Meijers A (ed) Philosophy of technology and engineering sciences. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 213–233
Priel D (2018) Not all law is an artifact: jurisprudence meets the common law. In: Burazin L, Himma KE, Roversi C (eds) Law as an artifact. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 239–267
Roversi C (2015) Legal metaphoric artifacts. In: Brożek B, Stelmach J, Kurek Ł (eds) The emergence of normative orders. Copernicus Center Press, Krakow, pp 215–280
Roversi C (2018) On the artifactual – and natural – character of legal institutions. In: Burazin L, Himma KE, Roversi C (eds) Law as an artifact. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 89–111
Schauer F (2012) On the nature of the nature of law. Arch Rechts Sozialphilos 98(4):457–467
Schauer F (2018) Law as a malleable artifact. In: Burazin L, Himma KE, Roversi C (eds) Law as an artifact. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 29–43
Searle JR (1995) The construction of social reality. The Free Press, New York
Searle JR (2010) Making the social world: the structure of human civilization. Oxford University Press, New York
Thomasson AL (2003) Realism and human kinds. Philos Phenomenol Res 67(3):580–609
Thomasson AL (2007) Artifacts and human concepts. In: Margolis E, Laurence S (eds) Creations of the mind. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 52–73
Thomasson AL (2009) Artifacts in metaphysics. In: Meijers AWM (ed) Philosophy of technology and engineering sciences. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 191–212
Thomasson AL (2014) Public artifacts, intentions, and norms. In: Franssen M, Kroes P, Reydon TAC, Vermaas PE (eds) Artefact kinds. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 45–62
Tuomela R (2002) The philosophy of social practices: a collective acceptance view. Cambridge University Press, New York
Tuomela R (2007) The philosophy of sociality: the shared point of view. Oxford University Press, New York
Tuomela R (2013) Social ontology: collective intentionality and group agents. Oxford University Press, New York
Tuzet G (2018) A strange kind of artifact. In: Burazin L, Himma KE, Roversi C (eds) Law as an artifact. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 217–238
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature B.V.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Burazin, L. (2019). Law as an Artifact. In: Sellers, M., Kirste, S. (eds) Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_217-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_217-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6730-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6730-0
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Law and CriminologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences