Skip to main content

Law as an Artifact

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy

Introduction

On a very broad reading, the idea that law is an artifact can be understood in the sense that law is artificial in character. In this sense it roughly means that law is posited or positive law, law understood as the creation of human beings, the product of human actions, and not something occurring naturally. However, a growing interest in the theories of artifacts within general philosophy (analytic metaphysics in particular) at the end of the twentieth and the beginning of the twenty-first century (Lowe 1983; Hilpinen 1992, 1993, 2011; Dipert 1993; Thomasson 2003, 2007, 2009, 2014; Baker 2004, 2006, 2008, 2010; Elder 2007; Houkes and Vermaas 2009; Preston 2009, among others) and social ontological theories (especially Searle 1995, 2010; Tuomela 2002, 2007, 2013) prompted legal philosophers (both legal positivists and natural law theorists) to inquire into the ontological implications of the thesis that law is an artifact, i.e., to explicate, by using the conceptual...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baker LR (2004) The ontology of artifacts. Philos Explor 7(2):99–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker LR (2006) On the twofold nature of artefacts: a response to Wybo Houkes and Anthonie Meijers. Stud Hist Philos Sci 37:132–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker LR (2008) The shrinking difference between artifacts and natural objects. Am Philos Assoc Newsl Philos Comput 07(2):2 http://people.umass.edu/lrb/files/bak08shrM.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker LR (2010) Shrinking difference – response to replies. Am Philos Assoc Newsl Philos Comput 09(2):3–38 http://people.umass.edu/lrb/files/bak10shr.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Burazin L (2015) Practical concepts of law as an artifact kind. Pravni vjesnik 31(3–4):65–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Burazin L (2016) Can there be an artifact theory of law? Ratio Juris 29(3):385–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burazin L (2018) Legal systems as abstract institutional artifacts. In: Burazin L, Himma KE, Roversi C (eds) Law as an artifact. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 112–135

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Crowe J (2014) Law as an artifact kind. Monash Univ Law Rev 40:737–757

    Google Scholar 

  • Dipert RR (1993) Artifacts, art works, and agency. Temple University Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin R (1998 [1986]) Law’s empire. Hart Publishing, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg KM (2009) Defending the possibility of a neutral functional theory of law. Oxf J Leg Stud 29(1):91–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg KM (2016) Functions of law. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg KM (2018) Law is an institution, an artifact, and a practice. In: Burazin L, Himma KE, Roversi C (eds) Law as an artifact. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 177–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder CL (2007) On the place of artifacts in ontology. In: Margolis E, Laurence S (eds) Creations of the mind. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 33–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnis J (2018) The nature of law. In: Tasioulas J (ed) Cambridge companion to philosophy of law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner J (2004) The legality of law. Ratio Juris 17(2):168–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green L (2013) The morality in law. In: Duarte d’Almeida L, Edwards J, Dolcetti A (eds) Reading HLA Hart The concept of law. Hart Publishing, Oxford/Portland, pp 177–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilpinen R (1992) On artifacts and works of art. Theoria 58(1):58–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilpinen R (1993) Authors and artifacts. Proc Aristot Soc New Ser 93:155–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilpinen R (2011) Artifact. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Standford encyclopedia of philosophy, Winter 2011 edn. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2011/entries/artifact/

  • Himma KE (2018) The Conceptual Function of Law: Law, Coercion, and Keeping the Peace. In: Burazin L, Himma KE, Roversi C (eds) Law as an artifact. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 136–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Houkes W, Vermaas PE (2009) Artefacts in analytic metaphysics. Techné Res Philos Technol 13(2):74–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leiter B (2011) The demarcation problem in jurisprudence: a new case for scepticism. Oxf J Leg Stud 31(4): 663–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leiter B (2018) Legal positivism about the artifact law: a retrospective assessment. In: Burazin L, Himma KE, Roversi C (eds) Law as an artifact. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 3–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe EJ (1983) On the identity of artefacts. J Philos 80(4):220–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marmor A (2018) Law, fiction, and reality. In: Burazin L, Himma KE, Roversi C (eds) Law as an artifact. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 44–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy MC (2015) Two unhappy dilemmas for natural law jurisprudence. Am J Jurisprud 60(2):121–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston B (2009) Philosophical theories of artefact function. In: Meijers A (ed) Philosophy of technology and engineering sciences. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 213–233

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Priel D (2018) Not all law is an artifact: jurisprudence meets the common law. In: Burazin L, Himma KE, Roversi C (eds) Law as an artifact. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 239–267

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Roversi C (2015) Legal metaphoric artifacts. In: Brożek B, Stelmach J, Kurek Ł (eds) The emergence of normative orders. Copernicus Center Press, Krakow, pp 215–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Roversi C (2018) On the artifactual – and natural – character of legal institutions. In: Burazin L, Himma KE, Roversi C (eds) Law as an artifact. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 89–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Schauer F (2012) On the nature of the nature of law. Arch Rechts Sozialphilos 98(4):457–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Schauer F (2018) Law as a malleable artifact. In: Burazin L, Himma KE, Roversi C (eds) Law as an artifact. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 29–43

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Searle JR (1995) The construction of social reality. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle JR (2010) Making the social world: the structure of human civilization. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thomasson AL (2003) Realism and human kinds. Philos Phenomenol Res 67(3):580–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomasson AL (2007) Artifacts and human concepts. In: Margolis E, Laurence S (eds) Creations of the mind. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 52–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomasson AL (2009) Artifacts in metaphysics. In: Meijers AWM (ed) Philosophy of technology and engineering sciences. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 191–212

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thomasson AL (2014) Public artifacts, intentions, and norms. In: Franssen M, Kroes P, Reydon TAC, Vermaas PE (eds) Artefact kinds. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 45–62

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tuomela R (2002) The philosophy of social practices: a collective acceptance view. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tuomela R (2007) The philosophy of sociality: the shared point of view. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tuomela R (2013) Social ontology: collective intentionality and group agents. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tuzet G (2018) A strange kind of artifact. In: Burazin L, Himma KE, Roversi C (eds) Law as an artifact. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 217–238

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luka Burazin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature B.V.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Burazin, L. (2019). Law as an Artifact. In: Sellers, M., Kirste, S. (eds) Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_217-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_217-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6730-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6730-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Law and CriminologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics