Advertisement

Human-Like Hand Mechanism

  • Ashish D. Deshpande
Reference work entry

Abstract

Capabilities of the robotic hands are limited when compared to the dexterity of human hands, and implementing some of the key features of the human biomechanics may lead to drastic improvements in robotic manipulation. We present two design ideas for mechanisms of the robotic hands inspired by human hand biomechanics. The first idea is to realize variable moment arms in the robotic fingers by using a tendon network and bone shapes. We show that in a robotic hand called, the ACT Hand, humanlike variable moment arm is achieved, and this implementation has positive implementations for the control of the hand for manipulation. Another idea is a novel design for joint with passive compliance that is inspired by biomechanical properties of the human hands. The design consists of a compliant material and a set of pulleys that rotate and stretch the material as the joint rotates, and experimental results with a 3-D printed prototype show that the joint exhibits human-like properties. Implementation of these two designs has shown promising results, and our ongoing work involved design and testing of control strategies for manipulation that take advantage of these design features.

References

  1. 1.
    D. Accoto, N.L. Tagliamonte, G. Carpino, F. Sergi, M. Di Palo, E. Guglielmelli, pVEJ: a modular passive viscoelastic joint for assistive wearable robots, in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (IEEE, 2012), pp. 3361–3366Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K.N. An, Y. Ueba, E.Y. Chao, W.P. Cooney, R.I. Linscheid, Tendon excursion and moment arm of index finger muscles. J. Biomech. 16, 419–425 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. Berselli, A. Guerra, G. Vassura, A.O. Andrisano, An engineering method for comparing selectively compliant joints in robotic structures. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 19(6), 1882–1895 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    P.W. Brand, K.C. Cranor, J.C. Ellis, Tendon and pulleys at the metacarpophalangeal joint of a finger. J. Bone Joint Surg. 57, 779–784 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Carpino, D. Accoto, M. Di Palo, N.L. Tagliamonte, F. Sergi, E. Guglielmelli, Design of a rotary passive viscoelastic joint for wearable robots, in IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) (IEEE, 2011), pp. 1–6Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    C. Connolly, Prosthetic hands from touch bionics. Ind. Robot Int. J. 35(4), 290–293 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A.D. Deshpande, R. Balasubramanian, J. Ko, Y. Matsuoka, Acquiring variable moment arms for index finger using a robotic testbed. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 57(8), 2034–2044 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A.D. Deshpande, J. Ko, D. Fox, Y. Matsuoka, Control strategies for the index finger of a tendon-driven hand. Int. J. Robot. Res. 32(1), 115–128 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A.D. Deshpande, Z. Xu, M.J.V. Weghe, B.H. Brown, J. Ko, L.Y. Chang, D.D. Wilkinson, S.M. Bidic, Y. Matsuoka, Mechanisms of the anatomically correct testbed hand. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 18(1), 238–250 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    N.K. Fowler, A.C. Nicol, B. Condon, D. Hadley, Method of determination of three dimensional index finger moment arms and tendon lines of action using high resolution MRI scans. J. Biomech. 34, 791–797 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    I.N. Gaiser, C. Pylatiuk, S. Schulz, A. Kargov, R. Oberle, T. Werner, The fluidhand III: a multifunctional prosthetic hand. JPO: J. Prosthetics Orthot. 21(2), 91–96 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    N. Hogan, Impedance control: an approach to manipulation: part II? Implementation. J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control. 107(1), 8–16 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    D.G. Kamper, H.C. Fischer, E.G. Cruz, Impact of finger posture on mapping from muscle activation to joint torque. Clin. Biochem. 21, 361–369 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    P.-H. Kuo, A.D. Deshpande, Muscle-tendon units provide limited contributions to the passive stiffness of the index finger metacarpophalangeal joint. J. Biomech. 45(15), 2531–2538 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    P.-H. Kuo, A.D. Deshpande, A novel joint design for robotic hands with humanlike nonlinear compliance. J. Mech. Robot. 8(2), 021004 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    P.-H. Kuo, J. Hayes, A.D. Deshpande, Design and performance of a motor-driven mechanism to conduct experiments with the human index finger. J. Mech. Robot. 7 031010-1–031010-10 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    T.D. Niehues, P. Rao, A.D. Deshpande, Compliance in parallel to actuators for improving stability of robotic hands during grasping and manipulation. Int. J. Robot. Res. (IJRR) 34, 256–269 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    L.U. Odhner, L.P. Jentoft, M.R. Claffee, N. Corson, Y. Tenzer, R.R. Ma, M. Buehler, R. Kohout, R.D. Howe, A.M. Dollar, A compliant, underactuated hand for robust manipulation. Int. J. Robot. Res. 33(5), 736–752 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    N.S. Pollard, R.C. Gilbert, Tendon arrangement and muscle force requirements for humanlike force capabilities in a robotic finger, in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2002Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    M.V. Weghe, M. Rogers, M. Weissert, Y. Matsuoka, The ACT hand: design of the skeletal structure, in Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    D.D. Wilkinson, M.V. Weghe, Y. Matsuoka, An extensor mechanism for an anatomical robotic hand, in IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, 2003Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Z. Xu, V. Kumar, Y. Matsuoka, E. Todorov, Design of an anthropomorphic robotic finger system with biomimetic artificial joints, in IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (IEEE, 2012), pp. 568–574Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mechanical EngineeringThe University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations