Human-Humanoid Interaction: Overview

  • Guido HerrmannEmail author
  • Ute Leonards
Reference work entry


The field of social robotics is burgeoning and driven by the idea that one day social robots will enter the home to take on a wide range of assistive roles; from household chores to caring for older people or our children. Many of these tasks will require that robots not only share the same spaces with people and work in their close proximity, but that they physically and socially interact with them to achieve a common goal, be it physically, socially, cognitively, or emotionally. This includes robots interacting with people who might be vulnerable and unable to easily adapt to changes in their environment. Such demands pose a range of challenges, from functional over social to ethical.

The current section of the Springer Handbook for Humanoids sets out to address a wide range of challenges that need to be tackled if we want to develop humanoid robots that can interact safely and responsibly with humans. In addition, questions such as whether interactive robots should look and behave in human-like ways will be addressed. Contributions are highly interdisciplinary in nature, ranging from engineering over psychology and medicine to philosophy and ethics. Each chapter provides a different angle and insight into state-of-the-art social robotics with focus on humanoids, representing its authors’ particular expertise, and highlighting the current challenges and future directions of research as seen from their personal perspectives.


  1. 1.
    G. Cheng, Humanoid robotics and neuroscience: science, engineering and society. ed. by G.P. Cheng (CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, 2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    T. Matsuzawa, Evolution of the brain and social behaviour in chimpanzees. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 23, 443 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C.A. Coey, M. Varlet, M.J. Richardson, Coordination dynamics in a socially situated nervous system. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6, 164 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. Press, Action observation and robotic agents: learning and anthropomorphism. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 35, 1410 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. Ermer, S.A. Guerin, L. Cosmides, J. Tooby, M.B. Miller, Theory of mind broad and narrow: reasoning about social exchange engages ToM areas, precautionary reasoning does not. Social Neurosci. 1, 196 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. Beckes, H. Ijzerman, M. Tops, Toward a radically embodied neuroscience of attachment and relationships. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9, 266 (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    C. Travers et al., Effectiveness of meaningful occupation intervention for people living with dementia in residential aged care: a systematic review. JBI Database System Rev. Implement Rep. 14, 163 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A.J. Calder, A.D. Lawrence, J. Keane, S.K. Scott, A.M. Owen, I. Christoffels, A.W. Young, Reading the mind from eye gaze. Neuropsychologia 40, 1129 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of BristolBristolUK
  2. 2.School of Experimental PsychologyUniversity of BristolBristolUK

Personalised recommendations