Microbially Mediated Chemical Transformations in Wetlands

  • Darren S. BaldwinEmail author
Reference work entry


This chapter discusses how the microbiota mediate the cycling of carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus and sulfur in wetlands. Wetlands have a number of characteristics that make them hot-spots for microbially-mediated transformation of constituents. Abundant plant life, adapted to aquatic environments represents a source of carbon (energy) to fuel microbial processes. Wetlands are sites of deposition of sediments, and often interact with ground-water, both of which are source of electron-acceptors for microbial processing. Biofilms growing on emergent and submerged plants, as well the root zone of aquatic plants, are active sites of reactions that require both oxic and anoxic zones such as coupled nitrification-denitrification. Finally, many wetlands are ephemeral, meaning the sediments undergo periodic wetting and drying, which can strongly influence nutrient cycling.


Carbon Nitrogen phosphorus Sulfur Nutrient cycling Wetting and drying 


  1. Anderson B, Bertlett K, Frolking S, Jenkins J, Salas W. Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from natural sources. United States environmental protection agency report EPA 430-R-10-001. 2010. Available at
  2. Baldwin DS, Fraser M. Rehabilitation options for inland waterways impacted by sulfidic sediments – a synthesis. J Environ Manag. 2009;91:311–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldwin DS, Mitchell AM. Effects of drying and re-flooding on the Sediment/Soil Nutrient-Dynamics of Lowland River floodplain systems -a synthesis. Reg Rivers Res Manag. 2000;16:457–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldwin DS, Mitchell AM. Impacts of sulfate pollution on anaerobic biogeochemical cycles in a wetland sediment. Water Res. 2012;46:965–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Jansen AJM, Roelofs JGM. Restoration of Cirsio-Molinietum wet meadows by sod cutting. Ecol Eng. 1996;7:279–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kayranli B, Scholz M, Mustafa A, Hedmark Ǻ. Carbon storage and fluxes within freshwater wetlands: a critical review. Wetlands. 2010;30:111–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Krauss G-J, Solé M, Krauss G, Schlosser D, Wesenberg D, Bärlocher F. Fungi in freshwaters: ecology physiology and biochemical potential. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2011;35:620–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. McCarthy B, Conalin A, D’Santos P, Baldwin D. Acidification, salinisation and fish kills at an inland wetland in south-eastern Australia following partial drying. Ecol Manag Restor. 2006;7:218–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. McClain ME, Boyer EW, Dent L, Gergel SE, Grimm NB, Groffman PM, Hart SC, Harvey JW, Johnston CA, Mayorga E, McDowell W, Pinay G. Biogeochemical hot spots and hot moments at the interface of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Ecosyst. 2003;6:301–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Oremland RS. Biogeochemistry of methanogenic bacteria. In: Zehnder AJB, editor. Biology of anaerobic microorganisms. New York: Willey; 1988. p. 405–47.Google Scholar
  11. Pant HK, Reddy KR. Hydrologic influence on stability of organic phosphorus in wetland detritus. J Environ Qual. 2001;30:668–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Rysgaard S, Risgaard-Petersen N, Nielsen LP, Reusbech NP. Nitrification and denitrification in lake and estuarine sediments measured by the 15N dilution technique and isotope pairing. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993;59:2093–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Sorrell BK. Regulation of root anaerobiosis and carbon translocation by light and root aeration in Isoetes alpinus. Plant Cell Environ. 2004;27:1102–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Valentine DL, Reeburgh WS. New perspectives on anaerobic methane oxidation. Environ Microbiol. 2008;2:477–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CSIRO Land and Water and, The Murray-Darling Freshwater Research CentreLa Trobe UniversityWodongaAustralia

Personalised recommendations