A diagnostic description of the genus is given with special emphasis on the occurrence of succulence amongst its species. The geographical distribution is outlined, together with a selection of important literature, and an explanation of the etymology of the name. This is followed by a short summary of its position in the phylogeny of the family and of the past and present classification in a phylogenetic context. The succulent features present amongst the species of the genus are shortly explained as to morphology and anatomy.
This is followed by a synoptical treatment of the succulent species of the genus, complete with typification details, full synonymy, geographical and ecological data, a diagnostic description, and, where applicable, notes on phylogenetic placement and relationships, as well as economic and/or horticultural importance.
- Duncan, G. [& al. 2016], Jeppe, B. & Voigt, L. (2016) The Amaryllidaceae of southern Africa. Hatfield (ZA): Umdaus Press.Google Scholar
- Dyer, R. A. (1950) A revision of the genus Brunsvigia. Pl. Life (Stanford) 6: 63–83.Google Scholar
- Dyer, R. A. (1951) A revision of the genus Brunsvigia. Pl. Life (Stanford) 7: 44–64.Google Scholar
- Snijman, D. A. (2012) A revision of the Brunsvigia radula-group (Amaryllidaceae: Amaryllideae) of species in South Africa, including the description of Brunsvigia gariepensis, a new species from Bushmanland in Northern Cape. South Afr. J. Bot. 79(1): 106–116, ills, maps, key. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2011.12.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar