Advertisement

Entscheiden und Problemlösen

  • Lisa MusculusEmail author
  • Karsten Werner
  • Babett Lobinger
  • Markus Raab
Living reference work entry

Zusammenfassung

Im Sport werden von verschiedenen Akteuren in verschiedenen Situationen Entscheidungen getroffen und Probleme gelöst. In diesem Kapitel wird beschrieben wie Entscheidungs- und Problemlöseprozesse theoretisch erklärt werden, wie empirische Studien diese Phänomene und Effekte im Sport abbilden und zu welchen Ergebnissen sie kommen. Weiterhin wird dargestellt, inwiefern eine kognitionspsychologische Perspektive auf Entscheiden und Problemlösen im Sport gewinnbringend ist und auch ein sich lohnendes Forschungs- und Betätigungsfeld für Sportwissenschaftlerinnen darstellt.

Dieser Beitrag ist Teil der Sektion Sportpsychologie, herausgegeben vom Teilherausgeber Dieter Hackfort, innerhalb des Handbuchs Sport und Sportwissenschaft, herausgegeben von Arne Güllich und Michael Krüger.

Schlüsselwörter

Kognition Optionsgenerierung Heuristiken Embodied problem solving Expertise 

Literatur

  1. Abernethy, B. (1991). Visual search strategies and decision-making in sport. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 22, 189–210.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  3. Ball, L. J., Marsh, J. E., Litchfield, D., Cook, R. L., & Booth, N. (2015). When distraction helps: Evidence that concurrent articulation and irrelevant speech can facilitate insight problem solving. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(1), 76–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bar-Eli, M., Plessner, H., & Raab, M. (2011). Judgment, decision-making and success in sport. Oxford: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belling, P. K., Suss, J., & Ward, P. (2015a). Advancing theory and application of cognitive research in sport: Using representative tasks to explain and predict skilled anticipation, decision-making, and option-generation behavior. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 16, 45–59.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.08.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belling, P. K., Suss, J., & Ward, P. (2015b). The effect of time constraint on anticipation, decision making, and option generation in complex and dynamic environments. Cognition, Technology and Work, 17(3), 355–366.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-015-0334-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bennis, W. M., & Pachur, T. (2006). Fast and frugal heuristics in sports. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7(6), 611–629.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2006.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Betsch, T., Funke, J., & Plessner, H. (2011). Allgemeine Psychologie für Bachelor: Denken-Urteilen, Entscheiden, Problemlösen. Lesen, Hören, Lernen im Web. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Bowden, E. M., Jung-Beeman, M., Fleck, J., & Kounios, J. (2005). New approaches to demystifying insight. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 322–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (1993). Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Psychological Review, 100(3), 432–459.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.432.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Csapo, P., Avugos, S., Raab, M., & Bar-Eli, M. (2015). How should „hot“ players in basketball be defended? The use of fast-and-frugal heuristics by basketball coaches and players in response to streakiness. Journal of Sports Sciences, 33(15), 1580–1588.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2014.999251.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dijksterhuis, A., & Nordgren, L. F. (2006). A theory of unconscious thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dörner, D., Kreuzig, H. W., Reither, F., & Stäudel, T. (1983). Lohhausen: Vom Umgang mit Unbestimmtheit und Komplexität. Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
  15. Duncker, K. (1935). Zur Psychologie des produktiven Denkens. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Edwards, W. (1954). The theory of decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 380–417.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0053870.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fleck, J. I., & Weisberg, R. W. (2013). Insight versus analysis: Evidence for diverse methods in problem solving. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 436–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 451–482.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103(4), 650–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gigerenzer, G., & Todd, P. (1999). Fast and frugal heuristics: The adaptive toolbox. Simple heuristics that make us smart. http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/pubman/item/escidoc:2102905/component/escidoc:2102904/GG_Fast_1999.pdf.
  22. Gilhooly, K. J. (2016). Incubation and intuition in creative problem solving. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Groot, A. D. de (1965). Thought and choice in chess. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  24. Hagemann, N., Strauss, B., & Büsch, D. (2008). The complex problem-solving competence of team coaches. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 9, 301–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hepler, T. J., & Feltz, D. L. (2012). Take the first heuristic, self-efficacy, and decision-making in sport. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18(2), 154–161.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027807.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Johnson, J. G. (2006). Cognitive modeling of decision making in sports. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7(6), 631–652.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2006.03.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnson, J. G., & Raab, M. (2003). Take the first: Option-generation and resulting choices. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91(2), 215–229.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00027-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Knoblich, G. & Öllinger, M. (2008). Problemlösen und logisches Schließen. In J. Müsseler (Hrsg.), Allgemeine Psychologie, (S. 552–598). Heidelberg/Berlin: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  29. Luchins, A. S. (1942). Mechanization in problem solving: The effect of Einstellung. Psychological Monographs, 54(6), i–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mann, D. T. Y., Williams, A. M., Ward, P., & Janelle, C. M. (2007). Perceptual-cognitive expertise in sport: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 29(4), 457–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marasso, D., Laborde, S., Bardaglio, G., & Raab, M. (2014). A developmental perspective on decision making in sports. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1–23.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2014.932424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mayer, R. E. (1992). Thinking, problem solving, cognition. New York, NY: Freeman.Google Scholar
  33. Musculus, L., Ruggeri, A., Raab, M., & Lobinger, B. (2017). The ecological rationality of children’s option generation and decision making. In Cognitive science proceedings.Google Scholar
  34. Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  35. Nitsch, J. R., & Hackfort, D. (2016). Theoretical framework of performance psychology: An action theory perspective. In M. Raab, B. Lobinger, S. Hoffman, A. Pizzera & S. Laborde (Hrsg.), Performance psychology (S. 11–29). London: Elsevier Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Oliveira, R. F. de, Lobinger, B. H., & Raab, M. (2014). An adaptive toolbox approach to the route to expertise in sport. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 709.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00709
  37. Öllinger, M. (2017). Problemlösen. In J. Müsseler & M. Rieger (Hrsg.), Allgemeine Psychologie (S. 587–619). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Öllinger, M., Jones, G., Faber, A. H., & Knoblich, G. (2013). Cognitive mechanisms of insight: The role of heuristics and representational change in solving the eight-coin problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 39, 931–939.Google Scholar
  39. Pizzera, A. (2012). Experience as gymnasts. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 83, 603–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Raab, M. (2002). T-ECHO: Model of decision making to explain behaviour in experiments and simulations under time pressure. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 3(2), 151–171.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1469-0292(01)00014-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Raab, M. (2012). Simple heuristics in sports. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 0(0), 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2012.654810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Raab, M. (2017). Motor heuristics and embodied choices: How to choose and act. Current Opinion in Psychology, 16, 34–37.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.02.029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Raab, M., & Johnson, J. G. (2004). Individual differences of action orientation for risktaking in sports. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 75(3), 326–336.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2004.10609164.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Raab, M., & Johnson, J. G. (2007). Expertise-based differences in search and option-generation strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13(3), 158–170.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.13.3.158.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Raab, M., & Reimer, T. (2007). Intuitive und deliberative Entscheidungen als Grundlage sportlicher Expertise. In N. Hagemann, M. Tietjens, & B. Strauß (Hrsg.), Psychologie der sportlichen Höchstleistung: Grundlagen und Anwendungen der Expertiseforschung im Sport (S. 93–117). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  46. Roth, K., & Strang, H. (1994). Action versus state orientation and the control of tactical decisions in sports. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Hrsg.), Volition and personality action versus state orientation (S. 467–474). Gottingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  47. Segal, E. (2004). Incubation in insight problem solving. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 141–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Starkes, J. L., Edwards, P., Dissanayake, P., & Dunn, T. (1995). A new technology and field test of advance cue usage in volleyball. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 66, 162–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tversky, A. (1972). Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psychological Review, 79(4), 281–299.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ward, P., & Williams, M. A. (2003). Perceptual and cognitive skill development in soccer: The multidimensional nature of expert performance. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 25, 93–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ward, P., Ericsson, K. A., Williams, M. A., & Williams, A. M. (2013). Complex perceptual-cognitive expertise in a simulated task environment. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 7(3), 231–254.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1555343412461254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lisa Musculus
    • 1
    Email author
  • Karsten Werner
    • 2
  • Babett Lobinger
    • 1
  • Markus Raab
    • 1
  1. 1.Psychologisches InstitutDeutsche Sporthochschule KölnKölnDeutschland
  2. 2.Universität PotsdamPotsdamDeutschland

Section editors and affiliations

  • Dieter Hackfort
    • 1
  1. 1.Department für SportwissenschaftUniversität der Bundeswehr MünchenNeubibergDeutschland

Personalised recommendations