CIRP Encyclopedia of Production Engineering

2019 Edition
| Editors: Sami Chatti, Luc Laperrière, Gunther Reinhart, Tullio Tolio

Coevolution of Manufacturing Systems

  • Tullio TolioEmail author
  • Hoda A. ElMaraghy
  • Anna Valente
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53120-4_16685

Synonyms

Definition

The coevolution paradigm refers to the joint design, development, and management of products, processes, and production systems throughout their life cycles. These three entities are defined in the following consistent with the CIRP Dictionary of Production Engineering:
  • Product is the output of the transformation made by a production system during execution of a process.

  • Process is the set of basic operations and logical procedures executed by the manufacturing (production) system to carry out a transformation resulting in obtaining a product.

  • Production (manufacturing) system is the set of resources, control logics, and management policies that allow performing a transformation to obtain a product by executing a process.

Theory and Application

Introduction

Manufacturing is challenged worldwide by complex economic, sociopolitical, and technological dynamics having tremendous impact on strategies followed by...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. AlGeddawy T, ElMaraghy H (2010) Co-evolution hypotheses and model for manufacturing planning. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 59(2):445–448zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. AlGeddawy T, ElMaraghy HA (2011) A model for co-evolution in manufacturing based on biological analogy. Int J Prod Res (IJPR) 49(15):4415–4435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. AlGeddawy T, ElMaraghy H (2012) A co-evolution model for prediction and synthesis of new products and manufacturing systems. ASME J Mech Des 134(5) Art. no. 051008.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4006439
  4. ElMaraghy H, AlGeddawy T (2012) Co-evolution of products and manufacturing capabilities and application in auto-parts assembly. Flex Serv Manuf J (FSMJ) 24(2):142–170.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-011-9088-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ElMaraghy H, AlGeddawy T, Azab A (2008) Modelling evolution in manufacturing: a biological analogy. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 57(1):467–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ko J, Hu SJ, Huang T (2005) Reusability assessment for manufacturing systems. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 54(1):113–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Tolio T, Ceglarek D, ElMaraghy H, Fischer A, Hu SJ, Laperriere L, Newman ST, Vancza J (2010) SPECIES—co-evolution of products, processes and production systems. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 59(2):672–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ueda K, Takenaka T, Váncza J, Monostori L (2009) Value creation and decision-making in sustainable society. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 58(2):681–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Wiendahl H-P, ElMaraghy H, Nyhuis P, Zäh MF, Wiendahl H-H, Duffie N, Brieke M (2007) Changeable manufacturing – classification, design and operation. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 56(2):783–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Zhang WJ, van Luttervelt CA (2011) Toward a resilient manufacturing system. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 60(1):469–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© CIRP 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tullio Tolio
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hoda A. ElMaraghy
    • 2
  • Anna Valente
    • 3
  1. 1.ITIA Institute of Industrial Technologies and AutomationCNR National Research CouncilMilanItaly
  2. 2.Canada Research Chair in Manufacturing SystemsIntelligent Manufacturing Systems Centre, University of WindsorWindsorCanada
  3. 3.ISTePS, Institute of Systems and Technologies for Sustainable ProductionSUPSI- University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Italian SwitzerlandMannoItaly

Section editors and affiliations

  • Günther Schuh
    • 1
  1. 1.Forschungsinstitut für Rationalisierung (FIR) e. V.RWTH AachenAachenDeutschland