Advertisement

Kreativität und Innovation bei der Unternehmensgründung

  • Jörg SydowEmail author
  • Thomas Schmidt
Living reference work entry

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Beitrag diskutieren wir, nach kurzer Klärung des Verhältnisses von Kreativität und Innovation, welche Rolle das Thema bislang in der wissenschaftlichen Entrepreneurship-Literatur spielt, und wie vor allem eine explizite Kreativitätsforschung in diesem Bereich in Zukunft ausgebaut werden könnte. Dazu analysieren wir zunächst die bislang noch eher überschaubare explizite Kreativitätsforschung im Entrepreneurship-Feld, die das Individuum, das Team oder das soziale Netzwerk von Gründerinnen fokussiert. Sodann diskutieren wir, inwieweit das Thema der Kreativität in dieser Forschung ein zumindest implizites Thema darstellt. Darauf aufbauend identifizieren wir Potenziale für die Kreativitätsforschung im Entrepreneurship-Feld.

Schlüsselwörter

Entrepreneurship Gründung Innovation Kreativität Unternehmertum Netzwerk 

Literatur

  1. Agogue, Marine, Mats Lundqvist, und Karen Williams Middleton. 2015. Mindful deviation through combining causation und effectuation: A design theory-based study of technology entrepreneurship. Creativity and Innovation Management 24(4): 629–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahlin, Branka, Mateja Drnovsek, und Robert D. Hisrich. 2014. Entrepreneurs’ creativity and firm innovation: The moderating role of entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Small Business Economics 43(1): 101–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amabile, Teresa M. 1996. Creativity in context. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  4. Amit, Raphael, und Christoph Zott. 2001. Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal 22(6–7): 493–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, Neil, Kristina Potočnik, und Jing Zhou. 2014. Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management 40(5): 1297–1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anokhin, Sergey, und William S. Schulze. 2009. Entrepreneurship, innovation, and corruption. Journal of Business Venturing 24(5): 465–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Autio, Erkko, Harry J. Sapienza, und James G. Almeida. 2000. Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and imitability on international growth. Academy of Management Journal 43(5): 909–924.Google Scholar
  8. Baker, Ted, und Reed E. Nelson. 2005. Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly 50(3): 329–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baron, Robert A., und Jintong Tang. 2011. The role of entrepreneurs in firm-level innovation: Joint effects of positive affect, creativity, and environmental dynamism. Journal of Business Venturing 26(1): 49–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bicen, Pelin, und William H. A. Johnson. 2015. Radical innovation with limited tesources in high-turbulent markets: The role of lean innovation capability. Creativity and Innovation Management 24(2): 278–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bögenhold, Dieter, und Udo Staber. 1994. Von Dämonen zu Demiurgen? Zur (Re-) Organisation des Unternehmertums in Marktwirtschaften. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
  12. Braun, Timo, Aristides Ferreira, Thomas Schmidt, und Jörg Sydow. 2018. Another post-heroic view on entrepreneurship: The role of employees in networking the start-up process. British Journal of Management 29(4): 652–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown, Tim. 2009. Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  14. Brüderl, Josef, Peter Preisendörfer, und Rolf Ziegler. 1998. Der Erfolg neugegründeter Betriebe: eine empirische Studie zu den Chancen und Risiken von Unternehmensgründungen, 2. Aufl. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  15. Burt, Ronald S. 2004. Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology 110(2): 349–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Busenitz, Lowell W., Lawrence A. Plummer, Anthony C. Klotz, Ali Shahzad, und Kevin Rhoads. 2014. Entrepreneurship research (1985–2009) and the emergence of opportunities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 38(5): 981–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cardon, Melissa S., Denis A. Gregoire, Christopher E. Stevens, und Pankaj C. Patel. 2013. Measuring entrepreneurial passion: Conceptual foundations and scale validation. Journal of Business Venturing 28(3): 373–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chalmers, Dominic M., und Eleanor Shaw. 2016. The endogenous construction of entrepreneurial contexts: A practice-based perspective. International Small Business Journal 35(1): 19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cohen, Wesley M., und Daniel A. Levinthal. 1989. Innovation and learning: The two faces of R & D. Economic Journal 99(397): 569–596.Google Scholar
  20. Cohen, Wesley M., und Daniel A. Levinthal. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35:128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Creswell, John W., und Plano Clark. 2011. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Davidsson, Per. 2015. Entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurship nexus: A re-conceptualization. Journal of Business Venturing 30(5): 674–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. DiMaggio, Paul. 1988. Interest and agency in institutional theory. In Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment, Hrsg. Lynne G. Zucker, 3–22. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  24. Dimov, Dimo. 2017. The reflective entrepreneur. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dushnitsky, Gary, und Michael J. Lenox. 2005. When do incumbents learn from entrepreneurial ventures? Corporate venture capital and investing firm innovation rates. Research Policy 34(5): 615–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dutta, Supradeep, und Timothy B. Folta. 2016. A comparison of the effect of angels and venture capitalists on innovation and value creation. Journal of Business Venturing 31(1): 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Eftekhari, Nazanin, und Marcel Bogers. 2015. Open for entrepreneurship: How open innovation can foster new venture creation. Creativity and Innovation Management 24(4): 574–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Eling, Katrin, und Cornelius Herstatt. 2017. Managing the front end of innovation – Less fuzzy, yet still not fully understood. Journal of Product Innovation Management 34(1): 864–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fallgatter, Michael J. 2004. Entrepreneurship: Konturen einer jungen Disziplin. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung 56(2): 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Florin, Juan, Michael Lubatkin, und William Schulze. 2003. A social capital model of high-growth ventures. Academy of Management Journal 46(3): 374–384.Google Scholar
  31. Fortwengel, Johann, Elke Schüßler, und Jörg Sydow. 2017. Studying organizational creativity as process: Fluidity or duality? Creativity and Innovation Management 26(1): 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gaba, Vibha, und Shantanu Bhattacharya. 2012. Aspirations, innovation, and corporate venture capital: A behavioral perspective. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 6(2): 178–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gartner, William B. 1985. A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy of Management Review 10(4): 696–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gärtner, Christian. 2014. Tools re-visited. Wie der matrialisierte Aufforderungscharakter von Tools Management- und Beratungsarbeit beeinflusst. Managementforschung 24:139–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. George, Gerard, Shaker A. Zahra, und D. Robley Wood. 2002. The effects of business-university alliances on innovative output and financial performance: A study of publicly traded biotechnology companies. Journal of Business Venturing 17(6): 577–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  37. Gielnik, Michael M., Michael Frese, Johanna M. Graf, und Anna Kampschulte. 2012. Creativity in the opportunity identification process and the moderating effect of diversity of information. Journal of Business Venturing 27(5): 559–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Grichnik, Dietmar, und Lars Immerthal. 2005. Rationalität und Risiko der Gründungsentscheidung. Die Betriebswirtschaft 65(6): 563–583.Google Scholar
  39. Hannan, Michael T., und John Freeman. 1984. Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review 49(2): 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jennings, Jennifer E., Tim Edwards, P. Devereaux Jennings, und Rick Delbridge. 2015. Emotional arousal and entrepreneurial outcomes: Combining qualitative methods to elaborate theory. Journal of Business Venturing 30(1): 113–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ketchen, David J., R. Duane Ireland, und Charles C. Snow. 2007. Stragegic entrepreneurship, collaborative innovation, and wealth creation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 1(3–4): 371–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Keynes, John Maynard. 1936. General theory of employment, interest and money. New York: Harcourt & Brace.Google Scholar
  43. Kickul, Jill, und Lisa K. Gundry. 2001. Breaking through boundaries for organizational innovation: New managerial roles and practices in e-commerce firms. Journal of Management 27(3): 347–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kirzner, Israel M. 1973. Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  45. Kirzner, Israel M. 2009. The alert and creative entrepreneur: A clarification. Small Business Economics 32(2): 145–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kollmann, Tobias, und Christoph Stockmann. 2014. Filling the entrepreneurial orientation-performance gap: The mediating effects of exploratory and exploitative innovations. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 38(5): 1001–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lampel, Joseph, Benson Honig, und Israel Drori. 2014. Organizational ingenuity: Concept, processes and strategies. Organization Studies 35(4): 465–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lee, Chonwoo, Kyungmook Lee, und Johannes M. Pennings. 2001. Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: A study on technology-based ventures. Strategic Management Journal 22(6–7): 615–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Liebl, Franz, und Thomas Düllo. 2015. Strategie als Kultivierung: Grundlagen-Methoden-Prozesse. Berlin: Logos.Google Scholar
  50. Lu, Jane W., und Paul W. Beamish. 2001. The internationalization and performance of SMEs. Strategic Management Journal 22(6–7): 565–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McMullen, Jeffrey S., und Dimo Dimov. 2013. Time and the entrepreneurial journey: The problems and promise of studying entrepreneurship as a process. Journal of Management Studies 50(8): 1481–1512.Google Scholar
  52. Miner, Anne S., Paula Bassoff, und Christine Moorman. 2001. Organizational improvisation and learning: A field study. Administrative Science Quarterly 46(2): 304–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nicolaou, Nicos, Scott Shane, Lynn Cherkas, und Tim D. Spector. 2008. The influence of sensation seeking in the heritability of entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 2(1): 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Obstfeld, David. 2005. Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 50(1): 100–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ortmann, Günther, und Jörg Sydow. 2018. Dancing in chains: Creative practices in/of organizations. Organization Studies 39(7): 899–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Park, Haemin D., und H. Kevin Steensma. 2013. The selection and nurturing effects of corporate investors on new venture innovativeness. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 7(4): 311–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Peng, Mike W. 2003. Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review 28(2): 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Perry-Smith, Jill E., und Russel W. Coff. 2011. In the mood for entrepreneurial creativity? How optimal group effect differs for generating and selecting ideas for new ventures. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 5(3): 247–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Perry-Smith, Jill E., und Pier V. Mannucci. 2017. From creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey. Academy of Management Review 42(1): 53–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Perry-Smith, Jill E., und Christina E. Shalley. 2003. The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Academy of Management Review 28(1): 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pinchot, Gifford. 1985. Intrapreneuring. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  62. Piva, Evila, Francesco Rentocchini, und Cristina Rossi-Lamastra. 2012. Is open source software about innovation? Collaborations with the open source community and innovation performance of software entrepreneurial ventures. Journal of Small Business Management 50(2): 340–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Priem, Richard L., Sali L. Li, und Jon C. Carr. 2012. Insights and new directions from demand-side approaches to technology innovation, entrepreneurship, and strategic management research. Journal of Management 38(1): 346–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Raab, Jörg, und Patrick Kenis. 2009. Heading toward a society of networks: Empirical developments and theoretical challenges. Journal of Management Inquiry 18(3): 198–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rammert, Werner, Arnold Windeler, Hubert Knoblauch, und Michael Hutter, Hrsg. 2016. Innovationsgesellschaft heute. Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
  66. Reid, Susan E., und Ulrike De Brentani. 2004. The fuzzy front end of new product development for discontinuous innovations: A theoretical model. Journal of Product Innovation Management 21(3): 170–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sammerl, Nadine, Bernd W. Wirtz, und Oliver Schilke. 2008. Innovationsfähigkeit von Unternehmen. Die Betriebswirtschaft 68(2): 131–158.Google Scholar
  68. Sarason, Yolanda, Tom Dean, und Jesse F. Dillard. 2006. Entrepreneurship as the nexus of individual and opportunity: A structuration view. Journal of Business Venturing 21(3): 286–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sarasvathy, Saras D. 2001. Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review 26(2): 243–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sarooghi, Hessamoddin, Dirk Libaers, und Andrew Burkemper. 2015. Examining the relationship between creativity and innovation: A meta-analysis of organizational, cultural, and environmental factors. Journal of Business Venturing 30(5): 714–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schmidt, Thomas. 2017. Creativity in the entrepreneurial journey: A state-of-the-art review and processual integration. In 4th Interdisciplinary European Conference on Entrepreneurship Research (Universität Siegen, Germany, 20–22 September 2017).Google Scholar
  72. Schmidt, Thomas, und Timo Braun. 2015. When cospecialization leads to rigidity: Path dependenc in successful strategic networks. Schmalenbach Business Review 67(4): 489–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Schumpeter, Joseph Alois. 1934 [1912]. The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Shalley, Christina E., Jing Zhou, und Greg R. Oldham. 2004. The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management 30(6): 933–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Shane, Scott. 2000. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science 11(4): 448–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Shane, Scott, und Sankaran Venkataraman. 2000. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review 25(1): 217–226.Google Scholar
  77. Slotte-Kock, Susanna, und Nicole Coviello. 2010. Entrepreneurship research on network processes: A review and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 34(1): 31–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Smith, Sheryl W., und Sonali K. Shah. 2013. Do innovative users generate more useful insights? An analysis of corporate venture capital investments in the medical device industry. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 7(2): 151–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Stokes, Patricia D. 2005. Creativity from constraints: The psychology of breakthrough. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  80. Sydow, Jörg, und Thomas Schmidt. 2017. Entrepreneurship as strategic network-creation: The case of a science-based start-up. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Babson College 37(6): 152–157.Google Scholar
  81. Sydow, Jörg, Elke Schüßler, und Gordon Müller-Seitz. 2016. Managing inter-organizationa relations. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Tang, Jintong, K. Michele Kacmar, und Lowell Busenitz. 2012. Entrepreneurial alertness in the pursuit of new opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing 27(1): 77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Teece, David J. 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy 15(6): 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Teece, David J. 1992. Competition, cooperation, and innovation: Organizational arrangements for regimes of rapid technological progress. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 18(1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Van de Ven, Andrew H., und Marshall Scott Poole. 1995. Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of Management Review 20(3): 510–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Welter, Frederike. 2011. Contextualizing entrepreneurship – Conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 35(1): 165–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Williams, Leslie K., und Stephen J. McGuire. 2010. Economic creativity and innovation implementation: The entrepreneurial drivers of growth? Evidence from 63 countries. Small Business Economics 34(4): 391–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Woodman, Richard W., John E. Sawyer, und Ricky W. Griffin. 1993. Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review 18(2): 293–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Zahra, Shaker A., und Gerard George. 2002. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review 27(2): 185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Zahra, Shaker A., R. Duane Ireland, und Michael A. Hitt. 2000. International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Academy of Management Journal 43(5): 925–950.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fachbereich WirtschaftswissenschaftFreie Universität BerlinBerlinDeutschland

Personalised recommendations