Advertisement

Regionale Innovationssysteme und Innovationscluster

  • Martin HeidenreichEmail author
  • Jannika Mattes
Living reference work entry

Zusammenfassung

In der Debatte um regionale Innovationssysteme und Innovationscluster wird der Raumbezug innovativen Handelns aus wirtschaftsgeografischer und regionalsoziologischer Perspektive thematisiert. Hierbei stehen die zentrale Bedeutung räumlicher Nähe und regionaler Institutionen im Mittelpunkt, wobei Regionalisierungs- und Globalisierungsprozesse zusammenwirken. Regionale Netzwerke, lokale Wissens- und Erfahrungsbestände und lokale Interaktionen avancieren gerade durch die regionale Einbettung multinationaler Unternehmen zu zentralen Brenn- und Knotenpunkten einer weltweiten Wissensgesellschaft.

Schlüsselwörter

Innovationssysteme Räumliche Nähe Regionale Institutionen Cluster Globalisierung 

Literatur

  1. Asheim, Bjørn T., und Meric S. Gertler. 2005. The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems. In The Oxford handbook of innovation, Hrsg. Jan Fagerberg, David C. Mowery und Richard R. Nelson, 291–317. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Asheim, Bjørn, und Høgni Kalsø Hansen. 2009. Knowledge bases, talents, and contexts: On the usefulness of the creative class approach in Sweden. Economic Geography 85(4): 425–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asheim, Bjørn T., und Arne Isaksen. 2002. Regional innovation systems: The integration of local ‚sticky‘ and global ‚ubiquitous‘ knowledge. Journal of Technology Transfer 27(1): 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asheim, Bjørn, Lars Coenen, und Jan Vang. 2007. Face-to-face, buzz, and knowledge bases: Socio-spatial implications for learning, innovation, and innovation policy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 25(5): 655–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Autio, Erkko. 1998. Evaluation of RTD in regional systems of innovation. European Planning Studies 6(2): 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bathelt, Harald, Anders Malmberg, und Peter Maskell. 2004. Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography 28(1): 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Becattini, Giacomo. 2017. The marshallian industrial district as a socio-economic notion. Revue d'économie industrielle 157(1): 13–32.Google Scholar
  8. Boschma, Ron. 2005. Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies 39(1): 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boschma, Ron, und Koen Frenken. 2010. The spatial evolution of innovation networks. A proximity perspective. In The handbook of evolutionary economic geography, Hrsg. Ron Boschma und Ron Martin, 120–135. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Camagni, Roberto. 1991. Innovation networks: Spatial perspectives. London: Wiley/Belhaven Press.Google Scholar
  11. Campbell, Tom. 2017. Can post-Brexit London survive as Europe’s cultural and financial capital? The Guardian, 23. Januar. www.theguardian.com/cities/2017/jan/23/post-brexit-london-economic-self-sabotage. Zugegriffen am 10.04.2018.
  12. Cantwell, John, und Simona Iammarino. 2003. Multinational corporations and European regional systems of innovation. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Cantwell, John, und Lucia Piscitello. 2005. Recent location of foreign-owned research and development activities by large multinational corporations in the European regions: The role of spillovers and externalities. Regional Studies 39(1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Castellani, Davide, und Antonello Zanfei. 2006. Multinational firms, innovation and productivity. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cooke, Philip. 2004. Introduction: Regional innovation systems: An evolutionary approach. In Regional innovation systems: The role of governance in a globalized world, Hrsg. Philip N., Martin Heidenreich Cooke und Hans-Joachim Braczyk, 1–18. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Cooke, Philip N., Patries Boekholt, und Franz Tödtling. 2000. The governance of innovation in Europe: Regional perspectives on global competitiveness. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  17. Cooke, Philip N., Martin Heidenreich, und Hans-Joachim Braczyk, Hrsg. 2004. Regional innovation systems: The role of governance in a globalized world. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Dosi, Giovanni. 1988. The nature of the innovative process. In Technical change and economic theory, 221–238. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  19. Edquist, Charles. 2001. Innovation policy: A systemic approach. In The globalizing learning economy, Hrsg. Daniele Archibugi und Bengt-Ake Lundvall, 219–237. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Einwiller, Ruth. 2016. Innovationsindex 2016: Baden-Württemberg im europäischen Vergleich. Statistisches Monatsheft Baden-Württemberg 12:17–25.Google Scholar
  21. Florida, Richard L. 2014. The rise of the creative class: Revisited. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  22. Geppert, Mike. 2003. Sensemaking and politics in MNCs: A comparative analysis of vocabularies within the global manufacturing discourse in one industrial sector. Journal of Management Inquiry 12(4): 312–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hansen, Teis. 2015. Substitution or overlap? The relations between geographical and non-spatial proximity dimensions in collaborative innovation projects. Regional Studies 49(10): 1672–1684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heidenreich, Martin. 2012. The social embeddedness of multinational companies: A literature review. Socio-Economic Review 10(3): 549–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heidenreich, Martin, und Knut Koschatzky. 2011. Regional innovation governance. In Handbook of regional innovation and growth, Hrsg. Philip Cooke, Bjørn Asheim, Ron Boschma, Ron Martin, Dafna Schwartz und Franz Tödtling, 534–546. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  26. Heidenreich, Martin, und Gerhard Krauss. 2004. The Baden-Württemberg production and innovation regime: Between past successes and new challenges. In Regional innovation systems: The role of governance in a globalized world, Hrsg. Philip N. Cooke, Martin Heidenreich und Hans-Joachim Braczyk, 186–213. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Herrigel, Gary. 1996. Crisis in German decentralized production: Unexpected rigidity and the challenge of an alternative form of flexible organization in Baden Württemberg. European Urban and Regional Studies 3(1): 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Koschatzky, Knut. 2001. Räumliche Aspekte im Innovationsprozess: Ein Beitrag zur neuen Wirtschaftsgeographie aus Sicht der regionalen Innovationsforschung. Münster: Lit.Google Scholar
  29. Koschatzky, Knut, und Elisabeth Baier. 2012. The impact of regional institutional characteristics on the location of MNCs: A European perspective. In Innovation and institutional embeddedness of multinational companies, Hrsg. Martin Heidenreich, 222–248. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  30. Krugman, Paul R. 1991. Geography and trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  31. Krüth, Katharina. 2018. Regionale Innovationsnetzwerke in Frankreich: F&E-Kooperationen innerhalb der pôles de compétitivité. Wiesbaden: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Le Bas, Christian, und Christophe Sierra. 2002. ‚Location versus home country advantages‘ in R&D activities: Some further results on multinationals’ locational strategies. Research Policy 31(4): 589–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Le Galès, Patrick, und Helmut Voelzkow. 2001. Introduction: The governance of local economies. In Local production systems in Europe: Rise or demise? Hrsg. Colin Crouch, Patrick Le Galès, Carlo Trigilia und Helmut Voelzkow, 1–24. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Markusen, Ann. 1996. Sticky places in slippery space: A typology of industrial districts. Economic Geography 72(3): 293–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Markusen, Ann. 1999. Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence, policy distance: The case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies. Regional Studies 33(9): 869–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marshall, Alfred. 1982. Principles of economics: Unabridged eighth edition, 8. Aufl. [Erstauflage: 1890]. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  37. Maskell, Peter, und Anders Malmberg. 1999. Localised learning and industrial competitiveness. Cambridge Journal of Economics 23(2): 167–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mattes, Jannika. 2010. Innovation in multinational companies: Organisational, international and regional dilemmas. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  39. Mattes, Jannika. 2012. Dimensions of proximity and knowledge bases: Innovation between spatial and non-spatial factors. Regional Studies 46(8): 1085–1099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mattes, Jannika. 2013. The regional embeddedness of multinational companies: A critical perspective. European Planning Studies 21(4): 433–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mattes, Jannika. 2016. The geography of innovation in multinational companies: Internal distribution and external embeddedness. In Handbook on the geographies of innovation, Hrsg. Richard Shearmur, Christophe Carrincazeaux und David Doloreux, 399–414. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mattes, Jannika, und Martin Heidenreich. 2012. Conclusion: Corporate embeddedness as a strategic and dynamic process of skilled actors. In Innovation and institutional embeddedness of multinational companies, Hrsg. Martin Heidenreich, 329–343. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  43. Mattes, Jannika, und Sinje Späth. 2013. Upgrading foreign subsidiaries in the case of a German multinational company: Bargaining processes at strategic and operative levels. Competition & Change 17(2): 129–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mattes, Jannika, Andreas Huber, und Jens Koehrsen. 2015. Energy transitions in small-scale regions – What we can learn from a regional innovation systems perspective. Energy Policy 78(C): 255–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Metcalfe, Stan. 1995. The economic foundations of technology policy: Equilibrium and evolutionary perspectives. In Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change, Hrsg. Paul Stoneman, 409–512. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  46. Nilsson, Magnus, und Jannika Mattes. 2015. The spatiality of trust: Factors influencing the creation of trust and the role of face-to-face contacts. European Management Journal 33(4): 230–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Piore, Michael J., und Charles F. Sabel. 1985. Das Ende der Massenproduktion: Studie über die Requalifizierung der Arbeit und die Rückkehr der Ökonomie in die Gesellschaft. Berlin: Wagenbach.Google Scholar
  48. Porter, Michael E. 1998. Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review 76(6): 77–90.Google Scholar
  49. Porter, Michael E. 2008. Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance, 2. Aufl. Riverside: Simon and Schuster/Free Press.Google Scholar
  50. Powell, Walter W., Kenneth W. Koput, und Laurel Smith-Doerr. 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly 41:116–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Saxenian, Anna Lee. 1996. Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Scott, Allen J. 1995. The geographic foundations of industrial performance. Competition & Change 1(1): 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zeitlin, Jonathan. 2008. The rediscovery of industrial districts: A disciplinary paradox. In The Oxford handbook of business history, Hrsg. Geoffrey Jones und Jonathan Zeitlin, 219–241. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Carl von Ossietzky Universität OldenburgOldenburgDeutschland

Personalised recommendations