Advertisement

Einleitung

  • Heidrun FrieseEmail author
Living reference work entry
Part of the Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften book series (SRS)

Zusammenfassung

Digitale Praktiken sind Teil des Alltags geworden. Sie haben Anteil an gesellschaftlichen Veränderungen und den Prozessen, die als Transformationen von der Produktionsgesellschaft zur Informationsgesellschaft, dem Informationszeitalter (Manuel Castells) oder der postindustriellen Gesellschaft (Daniel Bell) beschrieben worden sind. Sie sind auch Teil zunehmender weltweiter Mobilität (John Urry), globaler, transnationaler Netzwerke und sich verändernder gesellschaftlicher Organisation, die auf „networking“ beruht. Der Beitrag gibt einen Überblick über derzeitige Diskussionen und stellt die Struktur des Bandes vor.

Schlüsselwörter

Netzwerkgesellschaft Digitaler Alltag Kommunikationsformen Arbeit und Produktion Kulturproduktion und Kulturkonsum Subjektivität Methoden 

Literatur

  1. Anduiza, Eva, Marta Cantijoch, und Aina Gallego. 2009. Political participation and the Internet. Information, Communication & Society 12(6): 860–878.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180802282720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Back, Les. 2002. Aryans reading Adorno: Cyber-culture and twenty-first-century racism. Ethnic and Racial Studies 25:628–651.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870220136664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakardjieva, Maria. 2005. Internet society. The Internet in everyday life. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Barassi, Veronica. 2015. Activism on the web: Everyday struggles against digital capitalism. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baudrillard, Jean. 1988. Simulacra and simulations. In Jean Baudrillard. Selected writings, Hrsg. Mark Poster, 166–184. Stanford: Stanford University Press (orig. Simulacres et simulation. Paris: Editions Galilée, 1981).Google Scholar
  6. Bell, David. 2001. An introduction to cybercultures. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Benjamin, Walter. 1991 [1936–39]. Das Kunstwerk im Zeitalter seiner technischen Reproduzierbarkeit. Dritte Fassung. In Gesammelte Schriften, Hrsg. Rolf Tiedemann und Hermann Schweppenhäuser, Bd. I 2, 471–509. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  8. Boellstorff, Tom. 2008. Coming of age in second life: An anthropologist explores the virtually human. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. boyd, dana. 2014. It’s complicated. The social lives of networked teens. New Haven: Yale.Google Scholar
  10. Brinkerhoff, Jennifer F. 2009. Digital diasporas. Identity and transnational engagement. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brock, André. 2009. Life on the wire: Deconstructing race on the Internet. Information, Communication & Society 12(3): 344–363.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180802660628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bruns, Axel, Tim Highfield, und Jean Burgess. 2013. The Arab Spring and its social media audiences: English and Arabic Twitter users and their networks. American Behavioral Scientist 57(7): 871–898.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burkhalter, Byron. 1999. Reading race online: Discovering racial identity in UseNet discussions. In Communities in cyberspace, Hrsg. Marc A. Smith und Peter Kollock, 59–74. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Butler, Mary. 2011. Clicktivism, slacktivism, or ‚real‘ activism? Cultural codes of American activism in the Internet era. Communication graduate theses & dissertations. 12. https://scholar.colorado.edu/comm_gradetds/12. Zugegriffen am 29.07.2019.
  15. Cao, Xiaojie. 2015. Censorship and everyday forms of resistance in Chinese cyberspace. Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Media Studies. The University of Auckland: University of Auckland Research Repository, ResearchSpace.Google Scholar
  16. Castells, Manuel. 2002. The Internet galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, business, and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Castells, Manuel. 2003. Der Aufstieg der Netzwerkgesellschaft. Das Informationszeitalter, Bd. 1. Opladen: UTB – Leske & Budrich.Google Scholar
  18. Castells, Manuel. 2005. The network society. From knowledge to policy. In The network society. From knowledge to policy, Hrsg. Manuel Castells und Gustavo Cardoso, 3–21. Washington, DC: Johns Hopkins Center for Transatlantic Relations.Google Scholar
  19. Chandler, David, und Christian Fuchs, Hrsg. 2019. Digital objects, digital subjects: Interdisciplinary perspectives on capitalism, labour and politics in the age of big data. London: University of Westminster Press.Google Scholar
  20. Chen, Wenhong, Jeffrey Boase, und Barry Wellman. 2002. The global villagers: Comparing Internet users and uses around the world. In The Internet in everyday life, Hrsg. Barry Wellman und Caroline Haythornthwaite, 74–113. London: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Citton, Yves, Hrsg. 2014. L’économie de l’attention. Nouvel horizon du capitalisme? Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  22. Coe, Kevin, Kate Kenski, und Stephen A. Rains. 2014. Online and uncivil? Patterns and determinants of incivility in newspaper websites comments. Journal of Communication 64:658–679.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Coleman, Stephen. 1999. The new media and democratic politics. New Media & Society 1(1): 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Couldry, Nick. 2003. Media rituals. A critical approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Couldry, Nick. 2012. Media cultures: A world unfolding. In Media, culture, world. Social theory and digital media practice, 156–180. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  26. Curran, James. 2011. Media and democracy. Milton Park: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Curran, James, und David Morley, Hrsg. 2006. Media and cultural theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Daniels, Jessie. 2008. Race, civil rights, and hate speech in the digital era. In Learning race and ethnicity: Youth and digital media, Hrsg. Anna Everett, 129–154. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. Daniels, Jessie. 2009. Cyber racism: White supremacy online and the new attack on civil rights. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  30. Daniels, Jessie. 2013. Race, racism in Internet studies: A review and critique. New Media & Society 15(5): 695–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Daniels, Jessie. 2015. „My brain database doesn’t see skin color“: Color-blind racism in the technology industry and in theorizing the web. American Behavioral Scientist 59(11): 1377–1139.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764215578728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. De la Peña, Carolyn. 2010. The history of technology, the resistance of archives, and the whiteness of race. Technology and Culture 51(4): 919–937.Google Scholar
  33. Dennis, James. 2018. Beyond slacktivism. Political participation on social media. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  34. DiMaggio, Paul, Eszter Hargitai, Coral Celeste, und Steven Shafer. 1994. Digital inequality. From unequal access to differential use. In Social inequality, Hrsg. Kathryn Neckerman, 355–400. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  35. DiMaggio, Paul, Eszter Hargittai, Russel W. Neuman, und John P. Robinson. 2001. Social implications of the Internet. Annual Review of Sociology 27:307–336.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Döring, Nicola. 2003. Sozialpsychologie des Internet. Die Bedeutung des Internet für Kommunikationsprozesse, Identitäten, soziale Beziehungen und Gruppen. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  37. Dutton, William, Hrsg. 1999. Society on the line: Information politics in the digital age. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Eickelmann, Jennifer. 2017. „Hate Speech“ und Verletzbarkeit im digitalen Zeitalter. Phänomene mediatisierter Missachtung aus Perspektive der Gender Media Studies. Bielefeld: transcript.Google Scholar
  39. Escobar, Arturo, David Hess, Isabel Licha, Will Sibley, Marilyn Strathern, und Judith Sutz. 1994. Welcome to Cyberia: Notes on the anthropology of cyberculture [and comments and reply]. Current Anthropology 35(3): 211–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Fish, Adam, Luis F. R. Murillo, Lilly Nguyen, et al. 2011. Birds of the Internet. Journal of Cultural Economy 4(2): 157–187.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2011.563069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Franck, Georg. 1998. Ökonomie der Aufmerksamkeit: Ein Entwurf. München: Carl Hanser.Google Scholar
  42. Friese, Heidrun. 2004. Cultural Studies – Forschungsfelder und Begriffe. In Handbuch der Kulturwissenschaften, Bd. II, Paradigmen und Disziplinen, Hrsg. Friedrich Jaeger und Jürgen Straub, 467–486. Göttingen: Metzler.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Friese, Heidrun. 2015. Transnational mobilities, digital media and cultural resources. In Multiple Mediterranean realities. Current approaches to spaces, resources, and connectivities, Hrsg. Achim Lichtenberger und Constance von Rüden, 273–311. Munich: Fink/Ferdinand Schöningh.Google Scholar
  44. Fuchs, Christian, und Marison Sandoval, Hrsg. 2013. Critique, social media and the information society. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Garrett, Kelly R. 2006. Protest in an information society: A review of literature on social movements and new ICTs. Information, Communication & Society 9(2): 202–224.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180600630773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gunkel, David J. 2003. Second thoughts: Toward a critique of the digital divide. New Media & Society 5(4): 499–522.  https://doi.org/10.1177/146144480354003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Habermas, Jürgen. 1987. Theorie kommunikativen Handelns, 2 Bände, 4. Aufl. Frankfurt a. M: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  48. Hagendorff, Thilo. 2019. Rassistische Maschinen? In Maschinenethik – Normative Grenzen autonomer Systeme, Hrsg. Matthias Rath, Friedrich Krotz und Matthias Karmasin, 121–134. Wiesbaden: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hakken, David. 1999. Cyborg@Cyberspace: An ethnographer looks to the future. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Hall, Stuart. 1980. Encoding/decoding. In Culture, media, language. Working papers in cultural studies, 1972–79, Hrsg. Stuart Hall, Doothy Hobson, Andrew Lowe und Paul Willis, 128–138. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Halupka, Max. 2018. The legitimisation of clicktivism. Australian Journal of Political Science 53(1): 130–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hammonds, Evelynn M., und Rebecca K. Herzig, Hrsg. 2009. The nature of difference. Sciences of race in the United States from Jefferson to genomics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  53. Haraway, Donna. 1991. A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature, 149–181. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Hartman, Maren, und Friedrich Krotz. 2010. Online-Kommunikation als Kultur. In Handbuch Online-Kommunikation, Hrsg. Wolfgang Schweige und Klaus Beck, 234–256. Wiesbaden: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92437-3_10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hepp, Andreas. 2006. Translokale Medienkulturen: Netzwerke der Medien und Globalisierung. In Konnektivität, Netzwerk und Fluss. Konzepte gegenwärtiger Medien-, Kommunikations- und Kulturtheorie, Hrsg. Andreas Hepp, Friedrich Krotz, Shaun Moores und Christian Winter, 43–68. Wiesbaden: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Hepp, Andreas. 2009. Transkulturalität als Perspektive: Überlegungen zu einer vergleichenden empirischen Erforschung von Medienkulturen. Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung 10(1): Art. 26. www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/download/1221/2660. Zugegriffen am 01.08.2019.Google Scholar
  57. Hepp, Andreas, Marco Höhn, und Jeffrey Wimmer, Hrsg. 2010. Medienkulturen im Wandel. Konstanz: UVK.Google Scholar
  58. Hepp, Andreas, Cigdem Bozdag, und Laura Suna. 2011. Mediale Migranten. Mediatisierung und die kommunikative Vernetzung der Diaspora. Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
  59. Hine, Christine. 2000. Virtual ethnography. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Horkheimer, Max, und Theodor W. Adorno. 1997 [1947]. Kulturindustrie. Aufklärung als Massenbetrug. In Dialektik der Aufklärung. Philosophische Fragmente. Gesammelte Schriften, Hrsg. Rolf Tiedemann, Bd. 3, 141–191. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  61. Hunger, Uwe, und Kathrin Kisau, Hrsg. 2009. Internet und Migration. Theoretische Zugänge und empirische Befunde. Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
  62. Kahn, Richard, und Douglas Kellner. 2004. New media and Internet activism: From the ‚Battle of Seattle‘ to blogging. New Media & Society 6(1): 87–95.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444804039908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Karpf, David. 2010. Online political mobilization from the advocacy group’s perspective: Looking beyond clicktivism. Policy & Internet 2(4): Article 2.  https://doi.org/10.2202/1944-2866.1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Latour, Bruno, und Steven Woolgar. 1979. Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific acts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Leggon, Cheryl B. 2006. Gender, race/ethnicity and the digital divide. In Women, gender and technology, Hrsg. Mary Frank Fox, Deborah G. Johnson und Sue V. Rosser, 98–110. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  66. Leister, Oliver, und Theo Röhle, Hrsg. 2011. Generation Facebook. Über das Leben im Social Net. Bielefeld: transcript.Google Scholar
  67. Lin, Nan. 1999. Building a network theory of social capital. Connections 22(1): 28–51.Google Scholar
  68. Livingstone, Sonia. 2002. Young people and new media. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  69. Livingstone, Sonia. 2005. Critical debates in Internet studies: Reflections on an emerging field. London: LSE Research Online. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/1011. Zugegriffen am 29.07.2019.Google Scholar
  70. Lyon, David, Hrsg. 2003. Surveillance as social sorting. Privacy, risk, and digital discrimination. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  71. Madianou, Mirca, und Daniel Miller. 2012/2013. Polymedia. Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies 16(2): 169–187.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877912452486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Manovich, Lev. 2001. The language of new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  73. Markham, Annette N. 2005. The politics, ethics, and methods of representation in online ethnography. In Handbook of qualitative research, Hrsg. Norman K. Denzin und Yvonna S. Lincoln, 793–820. Thousand Oaks: Sage. http://www.markham.internetinquiry.org/research/. Zugegriffen am 29.07.2019.Google Scholar
  74. Markham, Steven T. 2014. Social media, protest cultures and political subjectivities of the Arab Spring. Media, Culture & Society 36(1): 89–104.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443713511893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Marwick, Alice E. 2012. The public domain: Social surveillance in everyday life. Surveillance & Society 9(4): 378–393.  https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v9i4.4342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Marwick, Alice E. 2013. Status update: Celebrity, publicity, and branding in the social media age. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Marwick, Alice E. 2015. Instafame: Luxury selfies in the attention economy. Public Culture 27(1): 137–160.  https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-2798379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. McCaughey, Martha, Hrsg. 2014. Cyberactivism on the participatory web. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  79. Miller, Vincent. 2011. Understanding digital culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  80. Miller, Daniel, und Don Slater. 2000. The Internet: An ethnographic approach. London: Berg.Google Scholar
  81. Miller, Daniel, Don Slater, und Lucy A. Suchman. 2004. Anthropology. In Academy and the Internet, Hrsg. Helen Nissenbaum und Monroe E. Price, 71–89. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  82. Morozov, Evgeny. 2011. The net delusion. The dark side of Internet freedom. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  83. Morozov, Evgeny. 2012. The filter bubble. What Internet is hiding from you. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  84. Nakamura, Lisa. 2002. Cybertypes: Race, ethnicity, and identity on the Internet. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  85. Nakamura, Lisa. 2006. Cultural difference, theory, and cyberculture studies: A case of mutual repulsion. In Critical cyberculture studies, Hrsg. David Silver, Adrienne Massanari und Steve Jones, 29–36. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  86. Nakamura, Lisa. 2008. Digitizing race: Visual cultures of the Internet. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  87. Nakamura, Lisa, und Peter A. Chow-White, Hrsg. 2012. Race after the Internet. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  88. Papacharissi, Zizi. 2004. Democracy online: Civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups. New Media & Society 6(2): 259–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Papacharissi, Zizi. 2010. A private sphere. Democracy in a digital age. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  90. Papacharissi, Zizi, und Maria de Fatima Oliveira. 2012. Affective news and networked publics: The rhythms of news storytelling on #Egypt. Journal of Communication 62:266–282.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01630.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Pieper, Marianne, Brigitta Kuster, und Vassilis Tsianos. 2011. „Making Connections“. Skizze einer net(h)nografischen Grenzregimeanalyse. In Generation Facebook. Über das Leben im Social Net, Hrsg. Oliver Leister und Theo Röhle, 221–248. Bielefeld: transcript.Google Scholar
  92. Pink, Sarah, Heather Horst, John Postill, Larissa Hjorth, Tania Lewis, und Jo Tacchi, Hrsg. 2016. Digital ethnography. Principles and practice. Los Angeles/London: Sage.Google Scholar
  93. Poell, Thomas, und José van Dijk, Hrsg. 2015. Social media and activist communication. In Social media and activist communication. The Routledge companion to alternative and community media, 527–537. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  94. Porter, David, Hrsg. 1997. Internet culture. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  95. Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  96. Ragnedda, Massimo, und Glenn Muschert, Hrsg. 2013. The digital divide: The Internet and social inequality in international perspective. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  97. Ragnedda, Massimo, und Glenn W. Muschert, Hrsg. 2017. Theorizing digital divide. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  98. Reed, T. V., Hrsg. 2014. Digitized lives: Culture, power, and social change in the Internet era. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  99. Rogers, Richard. 2009. The end of the virtual: Digital methods. Text prepared for the inaugural speech, Chair, New Media & Digital Culture, University of Amsterdam, 8 May 2009.  https://doi.org/10.5117/9789056295936. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238579672_The_End_of_the_Virtual_Digital_Methods. Zugegriffen am 29.07.2019.
  100. Rogers, Richard. 2013. Digital methods. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Schiller, Dan. 2000. Digital capitalism: Networking the global market system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  102. Schweiger, Wolfgang, und Klaus Beck, Hrsg. 2010. Handbuch Online-Kommunikation. Wiesbaden: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18016-4_11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Seglow, Jonathan. 2016. Hate speech, dignity and self-respect. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19:1103–1116.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-016-9744-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Seyfert, Robert, und Jonathan Roberge, Hrsg. 2016. Algorithmic cultures. Essays on meaning, performance and new technologies. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  105. Shapiro, Eve. 2010. Gender circuits: Bodies and identities in a technological age. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  106. Sharpe, C. E. 1999. Racialized fantasies on the Internet. Signs 24(4): 1089–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Shirky, Clay. 2008. Here comes everybody. The power of organizing without organizations. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  108. Shirky, Clay. 2011. Political power of social media. Technology, the public sphere, and political change. Foreign Affairs 28:28–41.Google Scholar
  109. Silver, David, Adrienne Massanari, und Steve Jones, Hrsg. 2006. Critical cyberculture studies. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  110. Slevin, James. 2000. The Internet and society. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  111. Smith, Marc A., und Peter Kollock, Hrsg. 1999. Communities in cyberspace. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  112. Sobieraj, Sarah, und Jeffrey M. Berry. 2011. From incivility to outrage: Political discourse in blogs, talk radio, and cable news. Political Communication 28:19–41.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2010.542360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Tai, Zixue. 2006. The Internet in China: Cyberspace and civil society. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  114. Taylor, Claire, und Thea Pitman. 2007. Latin American cyberculture and cyberliterature. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
  115. Tiidenberg, Katrin, und Edgar Gómez Cruz. 2015. Selfies, image and the re-making of the body. Body & Society 21(4): 77–102.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X15592465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Toffler, Alvin. 1980. The third wave. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  117. Turkle, Sherry. 1984. The second self: Computers and the human spirit. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  118. Turkle, Sherry. 1995. Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  119. Turkle, Sherry. 1999. Cyberspace and identity. Contemporary Sociology 28(6): 643–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Ullrich, Maria. 2017. Media use during escape. A contribution to refugees’. Collective agency. Spheres: Journal for Digital Cultures 4:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/3854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Valenzuela, Sebastian, Namsu Park, und Kerk F. Kee. 2009. Is there social capital in a social network site: Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust & participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 1(4): 875–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Waldron, Jeremy. 2012. The harm in hate speech. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Warschauer, Mark. 2003. Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  124. Webster, Frank. 2006. Theories of the information society, 3. Aufl. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  125. Wellman, Barry. 2004. The three ages of Internet studies: Ten, five and zero years ago. New Media & Society 6(1): 123–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Wellman, Barry, und Caroline Haythornthwaite. 2002. The Internet in everyday life. London: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Wellman, Barry, Anabel Quan Haase, James Witte, und Keith Hampton. 2001. Does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? American Behavioral Scientist 45(3): 436–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Wellman, Barry, Jeffrey Boase, und Wenhong Chen. 2002. The networked nature of community on and off the Internet. IT and Society 1(1): 151–165.Google Scholar
  129. Wilson, Samuel M., und Leighton C. Peterson. 2002. The anthropology of online communities. Annual Review of Anthropology 31:449–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Winter, Carsten, Andreas Hepp, und Friedrich Krotz, Hrsg. 2008. Theorien der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft. Grundlegende Diskussionen, Forschungsfelder und Theorieentwicklungen. Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
  131. Woolgar, Steve. 2002. Five rules of virtuality. In Virtual society? Technology, cyberbole, reality, 1–22. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  132. Woolgar, Steve. 2004. Reflexive Internet? The British experience of new electronic technologies. In The network society: A cross-cultural perspective, Hrsg. Manuel Castells, 125–142. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  133. Yar, Majid. 2014. The cultural imaginary of the Internet. Virtual utopias and dystopias. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Zickmund, Susan. 1997. Approaching the radical other: The discursive culture of cyberhate. In Virtual culture: Identity and communication in cybersociety, Hrsg. Steven G. Jones, 185–205. London/Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für Germanistik und Interkulturelle KommunikationTechnische Universität ChemnitzChemnitzDeutschland

Personalised recommendations