Advertisement

Gesundheitssystemtypologien

  • Nadine ReiblingEmail author
  • Claus Wendt
Living reference work entry
Part of the Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften book series (SRS)

Zusammenfassung

Der Beitrag gibt einen Überblick über den internationalen Vergleich von Gesundheitssystemen. Nach einer Einführung in den Terminus Gesundheitssystem werden zwei Perspektiven des Systemvergleichs vorgestellt: der Vergleich politischer Akteure und Institutionen des Gesundheitssystems und der Vergleich von Systemcharakteristika in den Bereichen Finanzierung, Regulierung und Leistungserbringung. Ausgewählte Gesundheitssystemtypologien aus beiden Perspektiven werden vorgestellt und systematisch verglichen. Der Beitrag zeigt darüber hinaus auf, welchen wissenschaftlichen Beitrag Gesundheitssystemtypologien leisten können und welche Theorien, Daten und Methoden ihnen zugrunde liegen.

Schlüsselwörter

Gesundheitssystem Typologie Akteure Institutionen Internationaler Vergleich 

Literatur

  1. Abrahamson, Peter. 1999. The welfare modelling business. Social Policy & Administration 33: 394–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boehm, Katharina, Achim Schmid, Ralf Goetze, Claudia Landwehr, und Heinz Rothgang. 2013. Five types of OECD healthcare systems: Empirical results of a deductive classification. Health Policy 113:258–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burau, Viola, und Robert H. Blank. 2006. Comparing health policy: An assessment of typologies of health systems. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 8:63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burau, Viola, Robert H. Blank, und Emmanuele Pavolini. 2015. Typologies of healthcare systems and policies. In The Palgrave international handbook of healthcare policy and governance, Hrsg. E. Kuhlmann, R. H. Blank, I. L. Bourgeault und C. Wendt, 101–115. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cacace, Mirella, Stefanie Ettelt, Nicholas Mays, und Ellen Nolte. 2013. Assessing quality in cross-country comparisons of health systems and policies: Towards a set of generic quality criteria. Health Policy 112:156–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cho, Esther Yin-Nei. 2014. Defamilization typology re-examined: Re-measuring the economic independence of women in welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy 24:442–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Danforth, Benjamin. 2014. Worlds of welfare in time: A historical reassessment of the three-world typology. Journal of European Social Policy 24:164–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Döhler, Marian, und Philip Manow. 1995. Staatliche Reformpolitik und die Rolle der Verbände im Gesundheitssektor. In Gesellschaftliche Selbstregelung und politische Steuerung, Hrsg. Renate Mayntz und Fritz W. Scharpf, 140–168. Frankfurt/New York: Campus.Google Scholar
  9. Esping-Andersen, Gosta. 1990. The three worlds of welfare capitalism, 1. Aufl. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  10. Field, Mark G. 1973. The concept of the „health system“ at the macrosociological level. Social Science & Medicine (1967) 7:763–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Freeman, Richard, und und Lorraine Frisina. 2010. Health care systems and the problem of classification. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 12:163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gauld, Robin, et al. 2011. Scorecards for health system performance assessment: The New Zealand example. Health Policy 103:200–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Giaimo, Susan, und Philip Manow. 1999. Adapting the welfare state the case of health care reform in Britain, Germany, and the United States. Comparative Political Studies 32:967–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hacker, Jacob S. 1998. The historical logic of national health insurance: Structure and sequence in the development of British, Canadian, and U.S. medical policy. Studies in American Political Development 12:57–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hurst, Jeremy, Melissa Jee-Hughes. 2001. Performance measurement and performance management in OECD health systems. OECD labour market and social policy occasional papers 47.Google Scholar
  16. Immergut, Ellen M. 1992. Health politics: Interests and institutions in Western Europe. Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kasza, Gregory J. 2002. The illusion of welfare. Journal of Social Policy 31:271–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Klenk, Tanja, und Frank Nullmeier. 2010. Welfare industries: Enterprises as providers of public goods. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 4:29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kringos, Dionne S., Wienke G. W. Boerma, Jouke van der Zee, und und Peter P. Groenewegen. 2013. Political, cultural and economic foundations of primary care in Europe. Social Science & Medicine 99:9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marmor, Theodore, und Claus Wendt. 2012. Conceptual frameworks for comparing healthcare politics and policy. Health Policy 107:11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Marshall, Thomas H. 1950. Citizenship and social class. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Mcloughlin, Vivienne, Sheila Leatherman, Martin Fletcher, und John Wyn Owen. 2001. Improving performance using indicators. Recent experiences in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 13:455–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Minas, Christos, David Jacobson, Efi Antoniou, und Caroline McMullan. 2014. Welfare regime, welfare pillar and southern Europe. Journal of European Social Policy 24:135–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moran, Michael. 1999. Governing the health care state: A comparative study of the United Kingdom, the United States, and Germany. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Moran, Michael. 2000. Understanding the welfare state:the case of health care. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 2:135–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nelson, Kenneth, und Johan Fritzell. 2014. Welfare states and population health: The role of minimum income benefits for mortality. Social Science & Medicine 112:63–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. OECD. 1987. Financing and delivering health care: A comparative analysis of OECD countries. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  28. Peters, Elke, Karl-Heinz Wehkamp, Ricardo E. Felberbaum, Detlef Krüger, und Roland Linder. 2006. Breastfeeding duration is determined by only a few factors. The European Journal of Public Health 16:162–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reibling, Nadine. 2010. Healthcare systems in Europe: Towards an incorporation of patient access. Journal of European Social Policy 20:5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Reibling, Nadine. 2013. The international performance of healthcare systems in population health: Capabilities of pooled cross-sectional time series methods. Health Policy 112:122–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Reibling, Nadine, Mareike Ariaans, und Claus Wendt. 2018. How many worlds of healthcare? A new healthcare system typology of 29 OECD countries. In NORFACE welfare state futures programme final conference, Florence.Google Scholar
  32. Rothgang, Heinz, Mirella Cacace, Simone Grimmeisen, und Claus Wendt. 2005. The changing role of the state in healthcare systems. European Review 13:187–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rothgang, H., et al. 2010. The state and healthcare: Comparing OECD countries. Basingstoke: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schaap, M. M., et al. 2008. Effect of nationwide tobacco control policies on smoking cessation in high and low educated groups in 18 European countries. Tobacco Control 17:248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schmid, Achim, Mirella Cacace, Ralf Götze, und Heinz Rothgang. 2010. Explaining health care system change: Problem pressure and the emergence of „hybrid“ health care systems. Journal of Health Politics, Policy & Law 35:455–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schmittdiel, Julie A., et al. 2017. Improvements in access and care through the affordable care act. The American journal of managed care 23:e95.Google Scholar
  37. Steinmo, Sven, und und Jon Watts. 1995. It’s the institutions, stupid! Why comprehensive national health insurance always fails in America. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 20: 329–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Terris, M. 1978. The three world systems of medical care: Trends and prospects. American Journal of Public Health 68:1125–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tuohy, Carolyn Hughes. 1999. Accidental logics: The dynamics of change in the health care arena in the United States, Britain, and Canada. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Tuohy, Carolyn Hughes. 2003. Agency, contract and governance: Shifting shapes of accountability in the health care arena. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 28:195–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wendt, Claus. 2009. Mapping European healthcare systems: A comparative analysis of financing, service provision and access to healthcare. Journal of European Social Policy 19:432–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wendt, Claus. 2013. Krankenversicherung oder Gesundheitsversorgung?: Gesundheitssysteme im Vergleich. Wiesbaden: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wendt, Claus. 2014. Changing healthcare system types. Social Policy & Administration 48: 864–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wendt, Claus, Lorraine Frisina, und Heinz Rothgang. 2009. Healthcare system types: A conceptual framework for comparison. Social Policy & Administration 43:70–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. WHO. 2000. The world health report 2000 – Health systems: Improving performance. Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universität SiegenSiegenDeutschland

Personalised recommendations