Advertisement

Zwischen Stadt und Zentralstaat

Metropolregionale Akteure im US-Föderalismus
  • Boris VormannEmail author
Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history

Part of the Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften book series (SRS)

Zusammenfassung

Abgesänge auf den Nationalstaat gingen nach Ende des Kalten Krieges oft einher mit dem Verweis auf erstarkende globale Städte und subnationale Regionen. Die Globalisierung schien Regionalismen ökonomisch und politisch zu begünstigen. Dieses Kapitel befasst sich historisch einordnend mit der Frage, inwiefern globale Metropolregionen in den USA tatsächlich eine eigenständige Regionalpolitik und eigene politische Institutionen entwickelt haben, um den neuen Realitäten globaler Märkte im 21. Jahrhundert zu begegnen.

Schlüsselwörter

Globale Städte Metropolregionen Suburbanisierung Regionalisierung Globalisierung 

Literatur

  1. Abu-Lughod, Janet L. 1999. New York, Chicago, Los Angeles. America’s global cities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  2. Brenner, Neil. 2002. Decoding the newest „Metropolitan Regionalism“ in the USA: A critical overview. Cities 19(1): 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brenner, Neil. 2009. Is there a politics of ‚urban‘ development? Reflections on the US case. In The city in American development, Hrsg. Richardson Dilworth, 122–140. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Cullingworth, Barry. 1997. Planning in the USA. Policies, issues and processes. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Davis, Mike. 1990. City of Quartz: Excavating the future in Los Angeles. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  6. Dear, Michael J. 2000. The postmodern Urban condition. Oxford/Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Dear, Michael J., Hrsg. 2002. From Chicago to L.A. Making sense of urban theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Ethington, Philip J., und David P. Levitus. 2009. Placing American political development. Cities, regions, and regimes, 1789–2008. In The city in American development, Hrsg. Richardson Dilworth, 154–176. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Fishman, Robert, Hrsg. 2000a. The American planning tradition. An introduction and interpretation. In The American planning tradition, 1–29. Washington, DC: The Woodrow Wilson Center Press.Google Scholar
  10. Fishman, Robert, Hrsg. 2000b. The metropolitan tradition in American planning. In The American planning tradition, 65–85. Washington, DC: The Woodrow Wilson Center Press.Google Scholar
  11. Florida, Richard, und Andrew Jonas. 1991. US Urban policy: The postwar state and capitalist regulation. Antipode 23(4): 349–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Friedmann, John. 1986. The world city hypothesis. Development and Change 17:69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Friedmann, John, und Goetz Wolff. 1982. World city formation: An agenda for research and action. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 3:309–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garreau, Joel. 1991. Edge city: Life on the new frontier. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  15. Glaeser, Edward Ludwig. 2011. Triumph of the city. How our greatest invention makes us richer, smarter, greener, healthier, and happier. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  16. Graham, Stephen, und Simon Marvin. 2001. Splintering urbanism. Networked infrastructures, Technological mobilities and the Urban condition. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Gray, Aelred J., und David A. Johnson. 2005. The TVA regional planning and development program. Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  18. Greenberg, Miriam. 2008. Branding New York. How a city in crisis was sold to the world. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Hackworth, Jason. 2007. The Neoliberal city. Governance, ideology, and development in American urbanism. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hall, Peter. 2001. Global city-regions in the twenty-first century. In Global city-regions: Trends, theory, policy, Hrsg. Allen J. Scott, 59–77. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hall, Tim, und Phil Hubbard, Hrsg. 1998. The entrepreneurial city. Geographies of politics, regime, and representation. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  22. Hall, Peter, und Mark Tewdwr-Jones. 2011. Urban and regional panning, 5. Aufl. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Hamilton, David K. 1999. Governing metropolitan areas: Response to growth and change. New York/London: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. Harvey, David. 1989. From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in Urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography 71(1): 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jackson, Kenneth T. 1985. Crabgrass frontier: The suburbanization of the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Keating, Michael. 2011. Staatenlose Nationen oder Regionalstaaten? Territorialität und Macht im Zeitalter der Globalisierung. In Québec: Staat und Gesellschaft, Hrsg. Alain-G. Gagnon, Ingo Kolboom und Boris Vormann, 381–400. Heidelberg: Synchron.Google Scholar
  27. Lieberman, Robert C. 2009. The city and exceptionalism in American political development. In The city in American development, Hrsg. Richardson Dilworth, 17–42. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Marcuse, Peter. 2006. The partitioned city in history. In Of states and cities. The partitioning of urban space, Hrsg. Peter Marcuse und Ronald van Kempen, 11–35. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Ross, Bernard H., und Myron A. Levine, Hrsg. 2006. Urban politics. Power in metropolitan America, 7. Aufl. Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  30. Sassen, Saskia. 1990. Economic restructuring and the American city. Annual Review of Sociology 16:465–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sassen, Saskia. 1991. The global city. New York, London, Tokio. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Schönig, Barbara. 2011. Pragmatische Visionäre: Stadtregionale Planung und zivilgesellschaftliches Engagement in den USA. Frankfurt a. M./New York: Campus.Google Scholar
  33. Scott, Allen John, John Agnew, Edward W. Soja, und Michael Storper. 2001. Global city-regions. In Global city-regions: Trends, theory, policy, Hrsg. Allen J. Scott, 11–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Skowronek, Stephen. 1982. Building a new American state. The expansion of national administrative capacities, 1877–1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Soja, Edward. 2011. Regional urbanization and the end of the metropolis era. In The new Blackwell companion to the city, Hrsg. Gary Bridge und Sophie Watson, 679–689. Malden/Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  36. United States Census Bureau (Census). 2012a. Growth in urban population outpaces rest of nation. www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/2010_census/cb12-50.html. Zugegriffen am 17.06.2019.
  37. United States Census Bureau (Census). 2012b. Population estimates. Metropolitan statistical areas. http://www.census.gov/popest/data/metro/totals/2012/tables/CBSA-EST2012-01.csv. Zugegriffen am 17.06.2019.
  38. United States Census Bureau (Census). 2012c. 2012 American community survey 1-year estimates New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA CSA. http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ACS_12_1YR_DP05&prodType=table. Zugegriffen am 17.06.2019.
  39. Vormann, Boris. 2015. Global port cities in North America: Urbanization and global production networks. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Wachsmuth, David. 2017. Infrastructure alliances: Supply-chain expansion and multi-city growth coalitions. Economic Geography 93(1): 44–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wagner, Robert F. 1980. New York city waterfront: Changing land use and prospects for redevelopment. In Urban waterfront lands, Hrsg. Committee on Urban Waterfront Lands, 78–99. Washington, DC: Committee on Urban Waterfront Lands.Google Scholar
  42. Wilson, William H. 1989. The city beautiful movement. Baltimore/London: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bard College BerlinBerlinDeutschland

Personalised recommendations