Use of Mobile Devices for Learning and Student Support in the Pacific Region

  • Bibhya SharmaEmail author
  • Pritika Reddy
  • Emmenual Reddy
  • Swasti Narayan
  • Vineet Singh
  • Raneel Kumar
  • Ravishel Naicker
  • Rajnesh Prasad
Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history


The Pacific Island communities face challenges such as digital divide, shoestring budgets, and escalating costs in the delivery of quality education to their people. In addition, the widely scattered nature of islands and communities requires proper communication infrastructure for learners to access education. This chapter heralds the emergence of mobile learning (mLearning) initiatives in higher education in the Pacific region. As a case study, the study focuses on the introduction of mLearning at the University of the South Pacific (USP) in the Pacific which developed a fit-for-purpose mLearning infrastructure that primarily utilized the short message service (SMS) for its delivery and services. The USP hosts an in-house setup open-source SMS gateway that facilitates its custom-made SMS services such as course notifications, exam timetable information, and online quizzes. More recently with the proliferation of smartphones in the Pacific, USP has invested largely on web-based services and mobile apps. The chapter presents the recent journey into the use of smartphones and tablets to access education and promotes lifelong and life-wide learning in the Pacific.


  1. Aksakal, N. 2015. Theoretical view to the approach of the edutainment. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 186 (2015): 1232–1239. Scholar
  2. Alexiou, A., and F. Paraskeva. 2010. Enhancing self-regulated learning skills through the implementation of an e-portfolio tool. Elsevier- Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2: 3048–3054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakardjieva, T., and B. Gradinarova. 2012. Wikis and blogs in e-learning context. In Methodologies, Tools and New Developments for E-Learning. InTech.Google Scholar
  4. Blurton, C. 1999. New directions of ICT-use in education. UNESCO’s World Communication and Information Report. Retrieved from
  5. Brown, J. 2005. New learning environments for the 21st century. Retrieved February 23, 2017, from:
  6. Butler, M. 2004. The use of games engines to create practical learning environments. Information Technology: Research and Education, 2004. ITRE 2004. In 2nd International Conference Information Technology: Research and Education, 29–33. IEEE.Google Scholar
  7. Commonwealth of Learning. 2015a. A baseline study of technology-enabled learning in the Commonwealth Pacific Island Countries. Burnaby, BC, Canada.Google Scholar
  8. Commonwealth of Learning. 2015b. Economic and social impact of ICT in the Pacific. Pacific Region Infrastructure Facility, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  9. Corona, F., C. Cozzarelli, C. Palumbo, and M. Sibilio. 2013. Information technology and edutainment: Education and entertainment in the age of interactivity. International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence 4 (1): 12–18. Scholar
  10. Georgouli, K., I. Skalkidis, and P. Guerreiro. 2008. A framework for adopting LMS to introduce e-learning in a traditional course. Educational Technology & Society 11: 227–240.Google Scholar
  11. Graham, C. 2004. Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs, ed. C. Bonk. San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Groff, J. 2013. Technology-rich innovative learning environments. In OCED CERI Innovative Learning Environment project, 1–30.Google Scholar
  13. Hande, S. 2014. Strengths weaknesses opportunities and threats of blended learning: Students’ perceptions. Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research 4: 336–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. IGI Global. 2017. What is Flexible Learning. Retrieved from
  15. International Telecommunication Union. 2015, June. ITU/Regional Presence. Retrieved March 17, 2017, from
  16. Internet Society. 2016. Mobile Internet Usage Trends in Asia-Pacific. Retrieved from
  17. Internet World Stats. 2016. Internet Usage and 2016 Population in Oceania. Retrieved 20 Mar 2017, from
  18. Kumar, B., and B. Sharma. 2016. Development of an online orientation tool for first year science students: Transitioning for success. Student Transitions Achievement Retention & Success, 1–8. Perth.Google Scholar
  19. Mehdipour, Y., and H. Zerehkafi. 2013. Mobile learning for education: Benefits and challenges. International Journal of Computational Engineering Research 3 (6): 93–101.Google Scholar
  20. Meleisea, E. 2008. ICT in teacher education: Case studies from the Asia-Pacific region. UNESCOGoogle Scholar
  21. Mirri, S., and P. Salomoni. 2011. Adaptation technologies in Mobile Learning. Retrieved 28 June 2015, from
  22. Moodle. 2017. Moodle Mobile. Retrieved from Moodle downloads:
  23. Niace. 2013. Family learning works: The inquiry into family learning in England and Wales. Leicester: Niace.Google Scholar
  24. Oller, R. 2012. The future of mobile learning. Research Bulletin. Retrieved from
  25. Parry, M. 2010. Online, Bigger Classes May Be Better Classes. Retrieved 22 Mar 2018, from The Chronicle of Higher Education:
  26. Pegrum, M., C. Howitt, and M. Striepe. 2013. Learning to take the tablet: How pre-service teachers use iPads to facilitate their learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 29:464–479.
  27. Reddy, P., and B. Sharma 2015. Effectiveness of tablet learning in online courses at University of the South Pacific. In 2015 second Asia-Pacific World Congress on Computer Science and Engineering (APWC on CSE), 1–9. IEEE.Google Scholar
  28. Reddy, E., P. Reddy, B. Sharma, K. Reddy, and M. Khan 2016. Student readiness and perception to the use of smart phones for higher education in the Pacific. In Asia-Pacific World congress on computer science and engineering, 1–14. IEEE.Google Scholar
  29. Ruiz, J., M. Mintzer, and R. Leipzig. 2006. The impact of e-learning in medical education. Academic Medicine 81 (3): 207–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sacramento County Office of Education. 2011. For adult educators: California distance learning project. Retrieved 9 Oct 2015, from cdlponline:
  31. Samoa Ministry of Education, Sports and Culture. 2014. Education for All 2015 National Review Report: Samoa. Retrieved May 2017, from
  32. Sharma, B., and A. Jokhan. 2010. Teaching science at a distance. In Accessible elements: teaching science online and at a distance, 235–246. Edmonton: Athabasca University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Sharma, B., and A. Jokhan. 2015. Handbook of mobile teaching and learning. Crown Copyright.Google Scholar
  34. Sharma, B., A. Jokhan, and A. Prasad. 2011. Online learning environment in mathematics via a pedagogical progression model of Moodle. In Global learn Asia Pacific 2011, 2241–2251. Melbourne: AACE.Google Scholar
  35. Sharma, B., A. Jokhan, R. Kumar, R. Finiasi, S. Chand, and V. Rao. 2015. Use of short message service for learning and student support in the Pacific Region. In Handbook of mobile teaching and learning, ed. Y. Zang, 199–220. Suva/Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sharma, B., F. Lauano, S. Narayan, A. Anzeg, B. Kumar, and J. Raj. 2018. Science teachers accelerated programme model: a joint partnership in the Pacific region. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 46 (1): 38–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. StatCounter. 2016. Mobile and tablet internet usage exceeds desktop for first time worldwide. Retrieved from
  38. Sung, H., and J. Blatchford. 2014. Supporting family learning and interaction through information and communications technology in public libraries in Taiwan. Journal of Librarianship and information science 47 (4): 294–302.Google Scholar
  39. The Fiji Time Online. 2016. The Fiji Times Online/Tablets for students. Retrieved 2 Mar 2017, from
  40. The University of the South Pacific. 2013. Strategic plan 2013–2018. Suva. Retrieved from
  41. The University of the South Pacific. 2017. USP stamps its technological mark on the region. Connections 22 (1): 10.Google Scholar
  42. The World Bank. 2017a. Fixed broadband subscriptions. Retrieved 10 Mar 2017, from
  43. The World Bank. 2017b. Internet users. Retrieved 10 Mar 2017, from
  44. The World Bank. 2017c. Mobile cellular subscriptions. Retrieved 10 Mar 2017, from
  45. Tinio, V. 2003. Retrieved February 26, 2017, from
  46. Traxler, J., and Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2005). Evaluating mobile learning: Reflections on current practice. In mLearn 2005: Mobile technology: The future of learning in your hands. 25–28 Oct 2005, Cape Town.Google Scholar
  47. Tsinakos, A. 2014. State of mobile learning around the world. In Global mobile learning implementations and trends, ed. A. Tsinakos and M. Alley, 4–44. Beijing: TV University Press.Google Scholar
  48. USP. 2017. Dashboard and business intelligence system. Retrieved from
  49. Vallurupalli, S., H. Paydak, S.K. Agarwal, M. Agrawal and C. Assad-Kottner. 2013. Wearable technology to improve education and patient outcomes in a cardiology fellowship program-a feasibility study. Health and Technology 3 (4): 267–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. West, M. 2012. Turning on mobile learning global themes. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Crown Copyright 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bibhya Sharma
    • 1
    Email author
  • Pritika Reddy
    • 1
  • Emmenual Reddy
    • 1
  • Swasti Narayan
    • 1
  • Vineet Singh
    • 1
  • Raneel Kumar
    • 1
  • Ravishel Naicker
    • 1
  • Rajnesh Prasad
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Science, Technology and EnvironmentUniversity of the South PacificSuvaFiji

Section editors and affiliations

  • Rob Power
    • 1
  1. 1.Athabasca UniversityVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations