Service-Learning Application in an M-Learning Course

  • Margaret SassEmail author
Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history


With the increasing popularity of smartphones, tablets, and laptops among college students, higher education institutions are beginning to implement these devices into the college curriculum. The academic community has realized that using mobile devices may encourage and increase academic intelligence. This troika relationship between the student, the mobile device, and the course is a form of m-learning, a method of teaching that is being practiced with increased frequency throughout national and international campuses. Sharples et al. (Mobile learning. Springer, pp 233–249, 2009) state that “exploration is essentially mobile in that it either involves physical movement or movement through conceptual space, linking experiences and concepts into new knowledge” (p. 4). Education should be exploratory to the student, kindling a desire to learn more and do more.

This chapter examines the pedagogy behind m-learning and discusses the relationship of m-learning with service-learning curriculum. The challenges of m-learning are discussed, as well as the ways to successfully implement social media tools into the college classroom when a service-learning project is of focus. The purpose of this paper is to encourage instructors to consider using a form of m-learning in the classroom in collaboration with service learning as a way to engage the student in a familiar platform.


Service learning M-learning Social media tools Experiential learning Internet 


  1. Antonenko, P. 2015. The instrumental value of conceptual in educational technology research frameworks. Educational Technology Research and Development 63 (1): 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anthony, B., and J.R. Jewell. 2017. Students’ perceptions of using twitter for learning in social work Courses. Journal of Technology in Human Services 35(1): 38–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bassa, Avishay. 2013, June 4. Emaze: Nextgen presentation platform. Geektime. Accessed 3 Feb 2014.
  4. Bringle, R.G., and J.A. Hatcher. 1996. Implementing service learning in higher education. The Journal of Higher Education 67: 221–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carson, Biz. 2017, January 22. Tech insider. Business Insider. Accessed 16 June 2017.
  6. Chareonlarp, E. 2012, March 7. The networked media in the fragmented world. IDG Global Solutions. Accessed 29 Dec 2014.
  7. Chou, C.C., and S.J. He. 2017. The effectiveness of digital badges on student online contributions. Journal of Educational Computing Research 54 (8): 1092–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clifton, A., and C. Mann. 2011. Can YouTube enhance student nurse learning? Nurse Education Today 31 (4): 311–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Corbeil, J.R., and M.E. Valdes-Corbeil. 2007. Are you ready for mobile learning? Educause Quarterly 30 (2): 51.Google Scholar
  10. Dewey, J., and A.W. Small. 1897. My pedagogic creed (No. 25). New York: EL Kellogg & Company.Google Scholar
  11. Dunlap, J.C., and P.R. Lowenthal. 2014. The power of presence: Our quest for the right mix of social presence in online courses. In Real life distance education: Case studies in practice, ed. A.P. Mizell and A.A. Piña, 41–66. Greenwhich: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  12. Duran, R.L. 1983. Communicative adaptability: A measure of social communicative competence. Communication Quarterly 31 (4): 320–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Duran, R.L., and L. Kelly. 1988. An investigation into the cognitive domain of competence II: The relationship between communicative competence and interaction involvement. Communication Research Reports 5 (1): 91–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ferdig, R.E., and K.D. Trammell. 2004. Content delivery in the ‘blogosphere’. The Journal 31 (7): 12–20.Google Scholar
  15. Fontichiaro, K., and A. Elkordy. 2014. From starts to constellations: Digital badges can chart growth. Learning and Leading with Technology 41 (4): 13–15.Google Scholar
  16. Fox, S., K. Zickuhr, and A. Smith. 2009. Twitter and status updating, fall 2009. Pew Internet & American Life Project, 21 Oct 2009.Google Scholar
  17. Hayikaleng, N., S.M. Nair, and H.N. Krishnasamy. 2017. Using Youtube to improve EFL reading comprehension among vocation. Proceedings of the ICECRS 1 (1): 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heikkilä, A. 2006. Studying in higher education: Students’ approaches to learning, self-regulation, and cognitive strategies. Studies in Higher Education 31 (1): 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hullman, G.A. 2007. Communicative adaptability scale: Evaluating its use as an ‘other-report’ measure. Communication Reports 20 (2): 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Instagram. 2014. Instagram Press. Accessed 31 Jan 2015.
  21. Joyce, A. 2017. I remember that from my pins!: Using Pinterest to encourage active learning. Psychology Learning & Teaching. Scholar
  22. Junco, R., G. Heiberger, and E. Loken. 2011. The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 27 (2): 119–132. Scholar
  23. Kaye, Cathryn Berger. 2004. The complete guide to service learning. Minneapolis: Free Spirit Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. Kelly, M., C. Lyng, M. McGrath, and G. Cannon. 2009. A multi-method study to determine the effectiveness of, and student attitudes to, online instructional videos for teaching clinical nursing skills. Nurse Education Today 29 (3): 292–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kolb, D.A. 1984. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Vol. 1. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  26. MoLeNET. 2014. Molenet. Accessed 10 May 2014.
  27. Schaferhoof, Nick. 2016, October 18 . Torque. Accessed 17 June 2017.
  28. Sharples, M., I. Arnedillo-Sánchez, M. Milrad, and G. Vavoula. 2009. Mobile learning, 233–249. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar
  29. Shudgon, W., and M. Higgins. 2006. Limitations of mobile phone learning. The Jalt Call Journal 2 (1): 3–14.Google Scholar
  30. Snelson, C. 2011. YouTube across the disciplines: A review of the literature. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 7:159–169.Google Scholar
  31. Sopho, Monthira. 2014. Using snapchat as a higher education tool. Multimedia Portfolio. Accessed 3 Feb 2015.
  32. Stowell, J.R. 2015. Use of clickers vs. mobile devices for classroom polling. Computers & Education 82:329–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Thakore, H., and T. McMahon. 2006. Virtually there: E-learning in medical education. The Clinical Teacher 3 (4): 225–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Twitter Press. 2017. About. Accessed 15 Dec 2017.
  35. University of Sheffield. 2014. Learning and teaching services. Accessed 24 Dec 2014.
  36. Wheeless, V.E., and R.L. Duran. 1982. Gender orientation as a correlate of communicative competence. Southern Speech Communication Journal 48 (1): 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Williams, J.B., and J. Jacobs. 2014. Exploring the use of blogs as learning spaces in the higher education sector. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 20 (2): 232–247.Google Scholar
  38. YouTube Press. 2017. Statisics. Accessed 17 June 2017.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Communication DepartmentCollege of Southern IdahoTwin FallsUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Raeal J. Moore
    • 1
  1. 1.Research DivisionACT, IncIowa CityUSA

Personalised recommendations