Advertisement

Mobile Learning and Education: Synthesis of Open-Access Research

  • Teresa CardosoEmail author
  • Renato Abreu
Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history

Abstract

In a global and mobile society characterized by the possibility of portability, mobile devices are no longer accessories, but they are rather resources that we cannot do without. In fact, nowadays no one seems willing to give up these tools recognizing its potential in various fields. For instance, they allow not only to shorten various distances but also to respond to different situations of our daily life, and also, of course, they provide moments of leisure and entertainment. Thus, combining all these attributes, the benefit from them in education seems obvious. However, to what extent and how are mobile devices integrated in education? Is mobile learning or m-learning a reality? Or a fiction, instead? Therefore, the present study aims at clarifying these issues through a literature synthesis of research available in online databases. In this state of the art, m-learning is briefly characterized, namely, by describing some of its particular types and environments and also by a SWOT analysis (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats analysis). Students and teachers’ perceptions and practices on m-learning were also identified. We further identified determining factors that both students and teachers consider important in the use of mobile devices and in the acceptance of mobile learning. In short, the systematization of the analyzed literature summarizes experiences that promoted changes in both the alphabetization and digital literacy of the whole participating school communities. One can conclude that m-learning is a research area with a recent past, a dynamic present, and a promising future.

Keywords

Mobile learning and education Students and teachers’ perceptions and practices Open-access research Review and systematization of the literature Knowledge mapping 

References

  1. Abreu, Renato Danton Sampaio Ribeiro de. 2017. Mobile learning e educação em saúde: estudo de caso no ensino superior de práticas laboratoriais. Tese de Doutoramento, Universidade Aberta, Lisboa. https://repositorioaberto.uab.pt/handle/10400.2/6612.
  2. Abu-Al-Aish, Ahmad, and Steve Love. 2013. Factors influencing students’ acceptance of m-learning: An investigation in higher education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 14 (5): 82–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Álvarez, Salvia García, Estefanía Bleda Marco, Francisco Javier Castillo García, and Macarena Cuerva Jimeno. 2013. La opinión de profesionales sobre la incorporación de soportes tecnológicos portátiles en las aulas. RED. Revista de Educación a Distancia (39): 144–162. http://www.um.es/ead/red/39/.
  4. Attwell, Graham. 2007. Personal learning environments-the future of eLearning? eLearning Papers 2 (1): 1–8.Google Scholar
  5. Carrega, João António Marques da Costa Batista. 2011. A utilização do telemóvel em contexto educativo: um estudo de caso sobre as representações de alunos e de professores dos 9° e 12° anos de escolaridade. Dissertação de Mestrado, Universidade Aberta, Lisboa. http://repositorioaberto.uab.pt/handle/10400.2/2043.
  6. Chang, Yu-Lien, Huei-Tse Hou, Chao-Yang Pan, Yao-Ting Sung, and Kuo-En Chang. 2015. Apply an augmented reality in a mobile guidance to increase sense of place for heritage places. Educational Technology & Society 18 (2): 166–178.Google Scholar
  7. Cobcroft, Rachel S., Stephen J. Towers, Judith E. Smith, and Axel Bruns. 2006. Mobile learning in review: Opportunities and challenges for learners, teachers, and institutions. In Proceedings Online Learning and Teaching (OLT) conference 2006, En. Brisbane, 21–30. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/5399.
  8. Ekanayake, Sakunthala Yatigammana, and Jocelyn Wishart. 2014. Mobile phone images and video in science teaching and learning. Learning, Media and Technology 39 (2): 229–249.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.825628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Farrow, Robert. 2003. Mobile learning: A meta-ethical taxonomy. In IADIS International Conference, Mobile Learning 2011. Avila. http://oro.open.ac.uk/29149/.
  10. Firmin, Michael W., Ruth L. Firmin, Katlyn M. Orient, Anna J. Edwards, and Jennifer M. Cunliff. 2012. The Blackberry image: Self-identified perceptions and motivations associated with college student Blackberry use. Educational Media International 49 (1): 19–32.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2012.662622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gikas, Joanne, and Michael M. Grant. 2013. Mobile computing devices in higher education: Student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones & social media. The Internet and Higher Education 19: 18–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. González, Carina S., César A. Collazos, and Roberto García. 2016. Desafío En El Diseño de MOOCs: Incorporación de Aspectos Para La Colaboración y La Gamificación. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), no. 48 (January).  https://doi.org/10.6018/red/48/7.
  13. Han, Insook, and Shin, Won Sug. 2016. The use of a mobile learning management system and academic achievement of online students. Computers & Education 102: 79–89.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.07.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kenny, Richard F., Jocelyne M.C. Van Neste-Kenny, Pamela A. Burton, Caroline L. Burton, Caroline L. Park, and Adnan Qayyum. 2012. Using self-efficacy to assess the readiness of nursing educators and students for mobile learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 13 (3): 277–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Khaddage, Ferial, Wolfgang Müller, and Kim Flintoff. 2016. Advancing mobile learning in formal and informal settings via mobile app technology: Where to from Here, and how? Journal of Educational Technology & Society 19 (3): 16.Google Scholar
  16. Kobus, Martijn B.W., Piet Rietveld, and Jos N. van Ommeren. 2013. Ownership versus on-campus use of mobile IT devices by university students. Computers & Education 68: 29–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kukulska-Hulme, Agnes. 2009. Will mobile learning change language learning? ReCALL 21 (2): 157–165.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344009000202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lorenz, Birgy, and Kaido Kikkas. 2013. Standing at the crossroads: Mobile learning and cloud computing at Estonian schools. eLearning Papers 32 (10 pages). December. http://openeducationeuropa.eu/en/article/Standing-at-the-Crossroads%3A-Mobile-Learning-and-Cloud-Computing-at-Estonian-Schools-?paper=122239.
  19. Lowenthal, Jeffrey N. 2010. Using mobile learning: Determinates impacting behavioral intention. American Journal of Distance Education 24 (4): 195–206.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2010.519947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mathew, David, and Susan Sapsed. 2012. Distance learning students: Should we use technology or pedagogy to overcome work and life obstacles? eLearning Papers 31 (4 pages). November. http://openeducationeuropa.eu/en/article/Distance-Learning-Students%3A-Should-we-use-Technology-or-Pedagogy-to-Overcome-Work-and-Life-Obstacles%3F?paper=122650.
  21. McVeigh, Marie. 2004. Open access journals in the ISI citation databases: Analysis of impact factors and citation patterns a citation study from Thomson Scientific. Philadelphia: Thomson Corporation. http://ip-science.thomsonreuters.com/m/pdfs/openaccesscitations2.pdf.Google Scholar
  22. Mifsud, Louise, Anders I. Mørch, and Sigmund Lieberg. 2013. An analysis of teacher-defined activities with mobile technologies: Predecessor and successor tool use in the classroom. Learning, Media and Technology 38 (1): 41–56.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2012.655746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Misra, P.K. 2012. Each-one-teach-one mobile networks: An innovative strategy for knowledge access in Asian countries. Educational Media International 49 (2): 109–122.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2012.683961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nash, Susan Smith. 2007. Mobile learning, cognitive architecture and the study of literature. Issues in Informing Science & Information Technology 4: 811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. New Media Consortium, and EDUCAUSE (Association). 2010. The horizon report. Austin/Boulder: The New Media Consortium/EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative. http://www.nmc.org/pdf/2010-Horizon-Report.pdf.Google Scholar
  26. O’Bannon, Blanche W., and Kevin M. Thomas. 2015. Mobile phones in the classroom: Preservice teachers answer the call. Computers & Education 85 (July): 110–122.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.02.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Obringer, S. John, and Kent Coffey. 2007. Cell phones in American high schools: A national survey. Journal of Technology Studies 33 (1): 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Orlando, John. 2016. A comparison of text, voice, and screencasting feedback to online students. American Journal of Distance Education 30 (3): 156–166.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2016.1187472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Oró, Mariona Grané, Lucrezia Crescenzi Lanna, and Karina Olmedo Casas. 2013. Cambios en el uso y la concepción de las TIC, implementando el Mobile Learning. Revista de Educación a Distancia (37): 1–19. http://www.um.es/ead/red/37/.
  30. Roschelle, Jeremy. 2003. Keynote paper: Unlocking the learning value of wireless mobile devices. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 19 (3): 260–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rosenberg, W., and A. Donald. 1995. Evidence based medicine: An approach to clinical problem-solving. British Medical Journal 310 (6987): 1122–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Salinas, Jesús. 2016. La Investigación Ante Los Desafíos de Los Escenarios de Aprendizaje Futuros. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), no. 50 (July).  https://doi.org/10.6018/red/50/13.
  33. Sarrab, Mohamed, and Laila Elgamel. 2013. Contextual m-learning system for higher education providers in Oman. World Applied Sciences Journal 22 (10): 1412–1419.Google Scholar
  34. Sevillano-Garcia, M. Luisa, and Esteban Vazquez-Cano. 2015. The impact of digital mobile devices in higher education. Educational Technology & Society 18 (1): 106–119.Google Scholar
  35. Stowell, Jeffrey R. 2015. Use of clickers vs. mobile devices for classroom polling. Computers & Education 82 (March): 329–334.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tabuenca, Bernardo, Hendrik Drachsler, Stefaan Ternier, and Marcus Specht. 2012. OER in the mobile era: Content repositories’ features for mobile devices and future trends. eLearning Papers (32): 1–16.Google Scholar
  37. Teixeira, António, Antonio Garcia-Cabot, Eva Garcia-Lopez, José Mota, and Luis de-Marcos. 2015. A new competence-based approach for personalizing MOOCs in a mobile collaborative and networked environment / Un Nuevo Enfoque Basado En Competencias Para La Personalización de MOOC En Un Entorno Móvil Colaborativo En Red. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia 19 (1): 143–160.  https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.19.1.14578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Traxler, John. 2005. Defining mobile learning. In Proceedings, IADIS international conference on mobile learning, Malta, 261–266. http://www.iadisportal.org/mobile-learning-2005-proceedings.
  39. Traxler, John. 2007. Defining, discussing and evaluating mobile learning: The moving finger writes and having writ. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 8 (2): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Traxler, John. 2009. Current state of mobile learning. In Ally, Mohamed (ed.), Mobile Learning: Transforming the Delivery of Education and Training, 9–24. AU Press, Athabasca University.Google Scholar
  41. Traxler, John. 2010. Students and mobile devices. Alternatives Journal 18 (2): 149–160.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09687769.2010.492847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Traxler, John. 2011. Aprendizagem Móvel e Recursos Educativos Digitais do Futuro. Cadernos SACAUSEF VII (7): 35–46. http://crie.min-edu.pt/index.php?section=402&module=navigationmodule.
  43. Traxler, John, and Agnes Kukulska-Hulme. 2006. The evaluation of next generation learning technologies: The case of mobile learning. In ALT-C 2006: The next generation research proceedings, Heriot-Watt University, 143–152. Oxford: The Association for Learning Technology. http://oro.open.ac.uk/12295/1/JT_AKH_ALT_Research_2006_forORO.pdf, https://www.academia.edu/189346/The_Evaluation_of_Next_Generation_Learning_Technologies_the_Case_of_Mobile_Learning.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LE@D, Elearning and Distance Education Lab, Department of Education and Distance Learning and Teaching, UID4372-FCT-MCTESUniversidade Aberta (Open University of Portugal)LisbonPortugal
  2. 2.LE@D, Elearning and Distance Education Lab, UID4372-FCT-MCTESUniversidade Aberta (Open University of Portugal)LisbonPortugal
  3. 3.Department of Laboratory Sciences and Community Health, Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde de LisboaInstituto Politécnico de LisboaLisbonPortugal

Section editors and affiliations

  • Rob Power
    • 1
  1. 1.Athabasca UniversityVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations