Mobiles, Online Learning, and the Small Group Discovery Classroom: Reflections from South Australia

  • Melissa Nursey-BrayEmail author
Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history


The use of mobile technologies is prevalent, and it is incumbent on tertiary teachers to move with the times and build curricula that use mobile themes. Yet in-depth learning and critical thinking are still key goals. This chapter explores not only the efficacy of mobile technologies in delivering online curricula but considers how the use of small group discovery techniques that utilize online tools can enhance face-to-face teaching. This chapter presents the argument that a combination of online with small group discovery delivery give students the focused attention they require, hence avoiding the overuse of mobile devices for online delivery. Careful tutoring and small group discovery together with the use of mobile devices enhances pedagogical outcomes.


e-Learning Education Online Assessment Mobile learning Pedagogy Small group discovery 


  1. Alexander, B. 2006. Web 2.0: a new wave of innovation for teaching and learning? Educause Review 41 (2): 32–44.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, S., and J. McKenzie. 1998. An evaluation of information technology projects for university learning. Canberra: Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs, AGPS.Google Scholar
  3. Castleford, J., and G. Robinson. 1998. Evaluating IT-based resources for supporting learning and teaching in geography: Some case studies. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 22 (3): 375–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chinyio, Ezekiel, and Nick Morton. 2006. The effectiveness of e-learning. Architectural Engineering and Design Management 2: 73–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Conole, Grainne, Martin Dyke, and Jane Seale. 2004. Mapping pedagogy and tools for effective learning design. Computers & Education 43 (1–2): 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dennen, Vanessa, and Shunag Hao. 2014. Intentionally mobile pedagogy: The M-COPE framework for mobile learning in higher education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 23 (3): 397–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Enrique, Judith Guevarra. 2011. Tug-o-where: Situating mobilities of learning (t) here. Learning, Media and Technology 36 (1): 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Graham, David, and Jane McNeil. 1999. Using the internet as part of directed learning in social geography: Developing web pages as an introduction to local social geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 23 (2): 181–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hattie, J. 2013. Visible learning: A synthesis of 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Hwang, Gwo Jen, Po Han Wu, Ya. Yen Zhunag, and Yeuh Min Huang. 2013. Effects of the inquiry based mobile students. Interactive Learning Environment 21 (4): 338–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kirkwood, Aidan, and Linda Price. 2005. Learners and learning in the twenty-first century: What do we know about students’ attitudes towards and experiences of information and communication technologies that will help us design courses? Studies in Higher Education 30 (3): 257–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Koole, M.L. 2009. A model for framing mobile learning. In Mobile learning: Transforming the delivery of education and training, ed. M. Ally, 25–47. Athabasca: Lawrence Endhaum Associates.Google Scholar
  13. Lynch, Kenneth, Bob Bednarz, James Boxail, Lex Chalmers, Derek France, and Julie Kesby. 2008. E-learning for geography’s teaching and learning spaces. Journal of Teaching Geography in Higher Education 32 (1): 135–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Martin, David, and Richard Treves. 2007. Embedding e-learning in geographical practice. British Journal of Educational Technology 38 (5): 773–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Motiwalla, L. 2007. Mobile learning: A framework and evaluation. Computers & Education 49: 581–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rennie, F., and T. Morrison. 2012. e-learning and social networking handbook: Resources for higher education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Rich, D.C., A.J. Pitman, and M.V. Gosper. 2000. Integrated IT-based geography teaching and learning: A Macquarie University case study. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 24 (1): 116–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Saks, K., and A. Leijen. 2014. Distinguishing self-directed and self-regulated learning and measuring them in the e-learning context. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 112 (7): 190–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sander, P., K. Stevenson, M. King, and D. Coates. 2000. University students expectations of teaching. Studies in Higher Education 25: 309–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sha, Li., C.-K. Looi, Wenli Chen, and Bao Hai Zhang. 2011. Understanding mobile learning from perspective of self-regulated learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 28: 366–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sharpe, Rona, and Helen Beetham. 2010. Rethinking learning for the digital age: How learners shape their own experiences. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Whalley, Brian, Angharad Saunders, Robin Lewis, Michaela Buenemann, and Paul Sutton. 2011. Curriculum development: Producing geographers for the 21st century. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 35 (3): 379–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zurita, G., and M. Nussbaum. 2007. A conceptual framework based on activity theory for mobile CSCL. British Journal of Educational Technology 38: 213–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Australia 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geography, Environment and Population, Faculty of ArtsUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Raeal J. Moore
    • 1
  1. 1.Research DivisionACT, IncIowa CityUSA

Personalised recommendations