Advertisement

Characteristics of Mobile Teaching and Learning

  • Yu (Aimee) ZhangEmail author
Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history

Abstract

Mobile technology has been a growing trend for higher education and personalized learning (Peng et al. 2009; Alley 2009; Ainge 1995). Regarded as a vital learning tool for a new generation of students and teachers, it has attracted considerable attention in recent years (Alhassan 2016; Doug et al. 2009). Some researchers have argued mobile teaching and learning should be distinguished from online learning because of its own characteristics and functions (Alley 2009; Peng et al. 2009; Fraga 2012; Hennig 2016). A mobile device has different hardware features, software, and connection limitations to traditional computers (Zhang 2012). The characteristics of mobile devices and learning through mobile device are discussed in this chapter. The usage of mobile devices and the time requirements are different compared with learning on fixed computers (Yuh-Shyan et al. 2004; Doug et al. 2009). The advantages and limitation of mobile learning is also discussed in this chapter. The cost of the mobile network and connection quality also limited the learning activities on mobile devices (Zhang 2012). Online survey results from university students in different countries provided some intriguing findings about the future of mobile learning program design. Education program designers, schools, industry developers, and government should work together to provide a stable and safe mobile learning environment for students and individuals. But avoiding the potential risks when adopting mobile technology must be taken seriously.

Keywords

Mobile technology Mobile learning Mobile application design Blended learning 

Supplementary material

References

  1. Ahn, D., and D.-H. Shin. 2013. Is the social use of media for seeking connectedness or for avoiding social isolation? Mechanisms underlying media use and subjective well-being. Computers in Human Behavior 29: 2453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alhassan, R. 2016. Mobile learning as a method of ubiquitous learning: Students’ attitudes, readiness, and possible barriers to implementation in higher education. Journal of Education and Learning 5: 176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alkhezzi, F., and W. Al-Dousari. 2016. The impact of mobile learning on ESP learners’ performance. The Journal of Educators Online 13: 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alley, M. 2009. Mobile learning. Edmonton: AU Press.Google Scholar
  5. Al-Rahmi, W.M., M.S. Othman, and M.A. Musa. 2014. The improvement of students’ academic performance by using social media through collaborative learning in Malaysian higher education. Asian Social Science 10: 210.Google Scholar
  6. Baage, S.U. 2013. Using Wimba Voice Board to facilitate foreign language conversation course. In The plugged-in professor tips and techniques for teaching with social media, ed. S.P. Ferris and H.A. Wilder. Oxford, UK: Chandos Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Becker, A.S., A. Freeman, C. Giesinger Hall, M. Cummins, and B. Yuhnke. 2016. NMC/CoSN Horizon Report: 2016 K-12 Edition. Austin: The New Media Consortium.Google Scholar
  8. Bredl, K., and W. Bösche. 2013. Serious games and virtual worlds in education, professional development, and healthcare. Hershey: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Britt, L.L. 2013. Writing for Wikipedia: Co-constructing knowledge and writing for a public audience. In The plugged-in professor tips and techniques for teaching with social media, ed. S.P. Ferris and H.A. Wilder. Oxford, UK: Chandos Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Buffington, M.L. 2013. Organizing with pinterest and delicious. In The plugged-in professor tips and techniques for teaching with social media, ed. S.P. Ferris and H.A. Wilder. Oxford, UK: Chandos Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Butoi, A., N. Tomai, and L. Mocean. 2013. Cloud-based mobile learning. Informatica Economica 17: 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Castro, J.C. 2012. Learning and teaching art: Through social media. Studies in Art Education 53: 152–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cochrane, T. 2016. Mobile VR in education from the fringe to the mainstream. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning 8: 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dabbagh, N., and A. Kitsantas. 2012. Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education 15: 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Doug, V., K. David, and K. Ron Chi-Wai. 2009. Does using mobile device applications lead to learning? Journal of Interactive Learning Research 20: 469–485.Google Scholar
  16. Dunbar, F. 2017. 50 little things teachers, parents, and others can do to improve education. Accessed 28 Feb 2017. https://globaldigitalcitizen.org/50-practices-improving-education.
  17. Evans, C. 2008. The effectiveness of m-learning in the form of podcast revision lectures in higher education. Computers & Education 50: 491–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ferris, S.P., and H.A. Wilder, eds. 2013. The plugged-in professor tips and techniques for teaching with social media. Oxford, UK: Chandos Publishing.Google Scholar
  19. Flewitt, R., D. Messer, and N. Kucirkova. 2015. New directions for early literacy in a digital age: The iPad. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 15: 289–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fraga, L.M. 2012. Mobile learning in higher education. Ph.D. 3508602, The University of Texas at San Antonio.Google Scholar
  21. Friedman, S. 2007. Mobile marketing – All over the world. electronicretailer [Online]. Available: http://www.electronicretailermag.com/info/1007_global.html. Accessed 12 Nov 2007.
  22. Haipinge, E. 2013. Using Facebook Mobile as a tool to create a virtual learning community for pre-service teachers. In The plugged-in professor tips and techniques for teaching with social media, ed. S.P. Ferris and H.A. Wilder. Oxford, UK: Chandos Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Harris, M.A., C.E. Brett, W.D. Johnson, and I.J. Deary. 2016. Personality stability from age 14 to age 77 years. Psychology and Aging 31: 862–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heatley, E.R., and T.R. Lattimer. 2013. Using social media to enhance student learning. Techniques 88: 8–9.Google Scholar
  25. Hennig, N. 2016. Library technology reports. Chicago: American Library Association.Google Scholar
  26. Holotescu, C., and G. Grosseck. 2011. M3-learning -Exploring mobile multimedia microblogging learning. World Journal on Educational Technology 3: 168–176.Google Scholar
  27. Hsu, C.-K., G.-J. Hwang, and C.-K. Chang. 2013. A personalized recommendation-based mobile learning approach to improving the reading performance of EFL students. Computers & Education 63: 327–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hunt, E., and N. Zhou. 2017. What does the future hold for students starting university today? The Guardian.Google Scholar
  29. Hwang, G.-J., and H.-F. Chang. 2011. A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education 56: 1023–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hwang, G.-J., and S.-C. Chang. 2016. Effects of a peer competition-based mobile learning approach on students’ affective domain exhibition in social studies courses. British Journal of Educational Technology 47: 1217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. ITU. 2016. Measuring the information society report. ITU, online access: https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/publications/misr2016/MISR2016-w4.pdf.
  32. Jenkins, J.J., and P.J. Dillon. 2013. Learning through YouTube. In The plugged-in professor tips and techniques for teaching with social media, ed. S.P. Ferris and H.A. Wilder. Oxford, UK: Chandos Publishing.Google Scholar
  33. Kabugo, D., P.B. Muyingda, F.M. Masagazi, M. Mugagga, and M.B. Mulumba. 2016. Tracking Students’ eye-movements when reading learning objects on mobile phones: A discourse analysis of luganda language teacher-trainees’ reflective observations. Journal of Learning for Development 3: 51.Google Scholar
  34. Kaplan, A.M., and M. Haenlein. 2010. Users of the world, united! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons 53: 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kennedy, M.J., M.K. Driver, P.C. Pullen, E. Ely, and M.T. Cole. 2013. Improving teacher candidates’ knowledge of phonological awareness: A multimedia approach. Computers & Education 64: 42–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. KFRR. 2016. Australian kids & family reading report. KFRR, online access: http://www.scholastic.com.au/schools/ReadingLeaders/KFRR/assets/pdf/KFRR_AUS.pdf.
  37. Kolb, D. 1984. Experiential learning. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  38. Kukulska-Hulme, A., and J. Traxler. 2005. Mobile Learning a handbook for educators and trainers. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Kumar, A., Y. Liu, J. Sengupta, and Divya. 2010. Evolution of mobile wireless communication networks: 1G to 4G. International Journal of Electronics & Communication Technology 1: 68.Google Scholar
  40. Lewin, K. 1948. Selected papers on group dynamics. In Resolving social conflicts, ed. G.W. Lewin. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  41. Mccombs, S.W. 2010. Mobile learning: An analysis of student preferences and perceptions surrounding podcasting. Ed.D. 3411306, University of Houston.Google Scholar
  42. Metzgar, M. 2017. Community-focused versus market-driven education. Hybrid Pedagogy. Online access: http://hybridpedagogy.org/community-focused-versus-market-driven-education/
  43. Mishra, S.K. 2013. Quality education for children, youth, and adults through mobile learning. In Pedagogical applications and social effects of mobile technology integration, ed. J. Keengwe. Hershey: Information Science Reference.Google Scholar
  44. Oblinger, D., and L.J. Oblinger. 2005. Educating the net generation. EDUCAUSE. Oblinger and Oblinger, online access: www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen/.
  45. OECD. 2015. OECD skills outlook 2015: Youth, skills and employability. Paris: OECD Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. OECD. 2016a. Education in China a snapshot. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  47. OECD. 2016b. PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and equity in education. Paris: PISA.Google Scholar
  48. Peng, H., Y.J. Su, C. Chou, and C.C. Tsai. 2009. Ubiquitous knowledge construction: Mobile learning re-defined and a conceptual framework. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 46: 171–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Poore, M. 2013. Using social media in the classroom, a best practice guide. Los Angeles/London/New Delhi/Singapore/Washington DC: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  50. Prensky, M. 2001. Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon 9: 1.Google Scholar
  51. Rennie, F., and T. Morrison. 2012. e-Learning and social networking handbook: Resources for higher education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Rennie, F., and T. Morrison. 2013. e-Learning and social networking handbook, resources for higher education. New York/London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sana, F., T. Weston, and N.J. Cepeda. 2013. Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers. Computers & Education 62: 24–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Seo, K.K. 2013. Using social media effectively in the classroom, blogs, wikis, twitter, and more. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Sharples, M. 2000. The design of personal mobile technologies for lifelong learning. Computers & Education 34: 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shu-Chun, H., H. Sheng-Wen, S. Pei-Chen, and C. Cheng-Ming. 2017. To activate english learning: Listen and speak in real life context with an ar featured U-Learning system. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 20: 176–187.Google Scholar
  57. Statista. 2016. Most popular Apple App Store categories in 2016 [Online]. Statista. Available: http://www.statista.com/statistics/166976/popular-categories-in-the-app-store/.
  58. Stewart, M. 2011. Learning through Research: An introduction to the main theories of learning. JMU Learning and Teaching Press 4(1): 4–13.Google Scholar
  59. Sun, D., and C.K. Looi. 2017. Focusing a mobile science learning process: Difference in activity participation. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning 12: 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sun, D., C.K. Looi, L. Wu, and W. Xie. 2016. The innovative immersion of mobile learning into a science curriculum in Singapore: An exploratory study. Research in Science Education 46: 547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sung, H.-Y., and G.-J. Hwang. 2013. A collaborative game-based learning approach to improving students’ learning performance in science courses. Computers & Education 63: 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tyree, T.C.M. 2013. Using Twitter to assist students in writing a concise nut graph. In The plugged-in professor tips and techniques for teaching with social media, ed. S.P. Ferris and H.A. Wilder. Oxford, UK: Chandos Publishing.Google Scholar
  63. Vogel, D., D. Kennedy, and R.C.-W. Kwok. 2009. Does using mobile device applications lead to learning? Journal of Interactive Learning Research 20: 469–485.Google Scholar
  64. Williams, P.W. 2009. Assessing Mobile Learning effectiveness and acceptance. Ph.D. 3337432, The George Washington University.Google Scholar
  65. Yousafzai, A., C. Chang, A. Gani, and R.M. Noor. 2016. Multimedia augmented m-learning: Issues, trends and open challenges. International Journal of Information Management 36: 784–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhang, Y. 2012a. An analysis of collaboration in the Australian and Chinese mobile telecommunication markets. Doctor of Philosophy (Economics), University of Wollongong.Google Scholar
  67. Zhang, Y. 2012b. Developing animated cartoons for economic teaching. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice 9: 1–15.Google Scholar
  68. Zidoun, Y., F.E. Arroum, M. Talea, and R. Dehbi. 2016. Students’ perception about mobile learning in Morocco: Survey analysis. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies 10: 80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.WEMOSOFTWollongongAustralia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Rob Power
    • 1
  1. 1.British Columbia Institute of TechnologySurreyCanada

Personalised recommendations