Accessibility Challenges in Mobile Learning

  • Linda RobsonEmail author
Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history


Mobile learning opens up a wide variety of opportunities to deliver learning in new and exciting ways (Adoption of Mobile Technology in Higher Education, an Introduction). Making learning accessible is a challenge for educators regardless of the medium or platform with which they are working. This chapter looks at some of the accessibility challenges which educators face when moving to mobile delivery.

In some situations the use of mobile delivery opens up the education experience to being far more accessible to a wide range of learners than more traditional delivery style. However, it is frequently seen that while adopting mobile delivery is beneficial to one group of learners, it may be problematic for another.

This chapter briefly considers what accessibility means and why it is important in the wider context, before going on to consider the types of challenges which educational developers and teachers should be aware of when designing resources in order to maximize accessibility for students with disabilities.

It does not attempt to address every single accessibility issue and potential adjustment but to encourage the reader to consider a range of issues their learners may face and to raise awareness of how particular delivery choices may affect potential learner engagement. There is also an acknowledgment that it may not be possible to cater to all learners using a single delivery solution. Where there is conflict between the needs of different groups, in terms of usability, it may be appropriate to offer multiple ways for students to engage with the learning, instead of attempting to make every activity fully accessible.


Accessibility Prison or prison students Women or gender Accessibility legislation Disability Bring your own device Screen size Visual impairment Dyslexia Manual dexterity Touch screen Voice recognition Study environment Time-tabling Study environment Collaboration 


  1. Al-Rababah, B.A., and E.A. Abu-Shanab. 2010. E-government and gender digital divide: The case of Jordan. International Journal of Electronic Business Management 8 (1): 1–8. Accessed 7 Mar 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrigo, M.C.G. 2010. Mobile learning for all. Journal of the Research Centre for Educational Technology 6 (1): 94–102. [Online]. Accessed 29 May 2014.Google Scholar
  3. Coppin, P., and S.A. Hockema. 2009. Learning from the information workspace of an information professional with dyslexia and ADHD. In IEEE Toronto international conference – Science and technology for humanity, ed. IEEE, 801–807. Toronto.Google Scholar
  4. Duncan, P. 2015. Equity or Advantage? The effect of receiving access arrangements in university exams on students with Specific Learning Difficulties (SpLD). Workshop at National Association of Disability Practitioners International Conference 20th–24th July 2015, Manchester.Google Scholar
  5. Elnaggar, A. 2008. Towards gender equal access to ICT. Information Technology for Development 14 (4): 280–293. Accessed 7 Mar 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Global Partnership for Education. 2018. Education. [Online] Accessed 11 May 2018.
  7. Kirby, J.R., R. Silvestri, B.H. Allingham, R. Parrila, and C.B. La Fave. 2008. Learning strategies and study approaches of postsecondary students with dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities 41 (1): 85–96. [Online]. Accessed 11 Nov 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. O’Brien, B., J. Mansfield, and G. Legge. 2005. The effect of print size on reading speed in dyslexia. Journal of Research in Reading 28 (3): 332–349. [Online]. Accessed 25 Nov 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. OpenDyslexic. 2014. OpenDyslexic free and open source dyslexia typeface [Online]. Accessed 27 Apr 2014.
  10. Pike, A. 2010. Building bridges across the digital divide for HE students in prison. COLMSCT Final Report [Online]. Accessed 7 Mar 2014.
  11. Rainger, P. 2005. Accessibility and mobile learning. In Mobile learning – a handbook for educators and trainers, ed. A. Kukulaska-Hulme and J. Traxler, 57–69. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Robson, L. 2014. Additional help, additional problem – issues for supported dyslexic students. In Proceedings of HEA STEM annual conference, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  13. Schneps, M.H., J.M. Thomson, C. Chen, G. Sonnert, and M. Pomplum. 2013. E-readers are more effective than paper for some with dyslexia. PLoS One 8 (9): 1–9. [Online]. Accessed 11 Nov 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Seale, J.K. 2006. E-learning and disability in higher education: Accessibility research and practice. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Stastista. 2017. Statistics and market data on Online Demographics & Use [Online]. Accessed 10 May 2018.
  16. Tolbert, C., K. Mossberger, B. King, and G. Miler. 2007. Are all American women making progress online? African Americans and Latinas. Information Technologies and International Development 4 (2): 61–88. Accessed 7 Mar 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. We Are Social. 2017. Digital in 2017: Global overview [Online]. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK

Section editors and affiliations

  • Hea-Jin Lee
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Education and Human Ecology, Faculty of Mathematics EducationThe Ohio State University at LimaLimaUSA

Personalised recommendations