Advertisement

Internet-Based Peer-Assisted Learning: Current Models, Future Applications, and Potential

  • Tairan Kevin HuangEmail author
  • Jin Cui
  • Corinne Cortese
  • Matthew Pepper
Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history

Abstract

Peer-Assisted Learning (PAL) is recognized as an effective academic support program designed to assist students’ learning needs. At the tertiary level, universities in Western countries have developed and implemented various forms of PAL programs catering for students across disciplines, commonly targeting transitional subjects which are perceived to be difficult. Studies have demonstrated that PAL programs positively contribute to better student performance and higher student retention rates.

However, there has been relatively little discussion on how new technological trends can be applied to extend the PAL platform to suit the evolving student lifestyle and changes in learning behaviors. In this chapter, several models for Internet-based PAL are discussed and evaluated. The chapter also outlines some of the technological and other requirements for the establishment and maintenance of these Internet-based PAL programs. Finally, an evaluation of the potential outcomes is presented. The discussion highlights that Internet-based PAL programs can be used as an instructive complement to existing face-to-face PAL programs, further extending the benefits of student peer learning and social exchange with the convenience of mobile technology.

Keywords

Mobile technology Mobile learning Peer-Assisted Learning (PAL) 

References

  1. Anderson, M., H. Hagen, and G. Harter. 2011. The coming wave of ‘social apponomics’. Strategy + Business 62: 8–13.Google Scholar
  2. Arendale, D.R. 1994. Understanding the supplemental instruction model. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 60: 11–21.Google Scholar
  3. Arkoudis, S., and L. Tran. 2010. Writing blah, blah, blah: Lecturers’ approaches and challenges in supporting international students. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 22 (2): 169–178.Google Scholar
  4. Armstrong, L., C. Power, C. Coady, and L. Dormer. 2011. Video-based supplemental instruction: Creating opportunities for at-risk students undertaking engineering mathematics. Journal of Peer Learning 4 (1): 3–15.Google Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. 1977. Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Beaumont, T.J., A.P. Mannion, and B.O. Shen. 2012. From the campus to the cloud: The online peer assisted learning scheme. Journal of Peer Learning 5 (1): 1–15.Google Scholar
  7. Beckmann, E.A., and P. Kilby. 2008. On-line, off-campus but in the flow: Learning from peers in development studies. Journal of Peer Learning 1 (1): 61–69.Google Scholar
  8. Belot, H. 2016. Australian National University investigate essay farm targeting Chinese students. The Canberra Times, 13 Jan.Google Scholar
  9. Blanc, R.A., L.E. DeBuhr, and D.C. Martin. 1983. Breaking the attrition cycle: The effects of supplemental instruction on undergraduate performance and attrition. The Journal of Higher Education 54 (1): 80–90.Google Scholar
  10. Bonk, C.J. 2006. The future of online teaching and learning in higher education: The survey says. Educause Quarterly 29: 22–30 http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/future-online-teaching-and-learning-higher-education-survey-says.Google Scholar
  11. Burgess, M.L., J.R. Slate, A. Rojas-LeBouef, and K. LaPrairie. 2010. Teaching and learning in second life: Using the community of inquiry (CoI) model to support online instruction with graduate students in instructional technology. The Internet and Higher Education 13 (1): 84–88.Google Scholar
  12. Calkins, F.J. 2012. Materials and methods of teaching business finance. The Journal of Finance 5 (3): 275–279.Google Scholar
  13. Cook, V. 2001. Using the first language in the classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review 57 (3): 402–423.Google Scholar
  14. Cui, J., T. Huang, C.L. Cortese, and M. Pepper. 2014. Using a bilingual peer assisted learning (B-PAL) model to assist the teaching of Chinese accounting student in Australian higher education, Paper presented at the critical perspective on accounting conference. Toronto: York University.Google Scholar
  15. Cui, J., T. Huang, C.L. Cortese, and M. Pepper. 2015. Reflections on a bilingual peer assisted learning program. International Journal of Educational Management 8 (2): 284–297.Google Scholar
  16. Dawson, P., J. van der Meer, J. Skalicky, and K. Cowley. 2014. On the effectiveness of supplemental instruction: A systematic review of supplemental instruction and peer-assisted study sessions literature between 2001 and 2010. Review of Educational Research 84 (4): 609–639.Google Scholar
  17. Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. 2010. Indigenous education (targeted assistance) act 2000 program guidelines 2009 to 2012. http://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/2009_-_2012_ieta_guidelines_document.pdf. Accessed 20 Jun 2014.
  18. Devine, J., and L. Jolly. 2011. Questions arising from the use of peer assisted learning as a technique to increase diverse participation in engineering education. In Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education (AaeE 2011). Fremantle.Google Scholar
  19. Entwistle, N., and P. Ramsden. 2015. Understanding student learning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Etter, E.R., S.L. Burmersiter, and R.J. Elder. 2001. Improving student performance and retention via supplemental instruction. Journal of Accounting Education 18 (4): 355–368.Google Scholar
  21. Friedrich, R., M. Peterson, and A. Koster. 2011. The rise of generation C. Strategy + Business 62: 1–8.Google Scholar
  22. Ghorbani, A. 2011. First language use in foreign language classroom discourse. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 29: 1654–1659.Google Scholar
  23. Ginsburg-Block, M.D., C.A. Rohrbeck, and J.W. Fantuzzo. 2006. A meta-analytic review of social, self-concept, and behavioral outcomes of peer-assisted learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 98 (4): 729–732.Google Scholar
  24. Hemsley-Brown, J., and I. Oplatka. 2006. Universities in a competitive global marketplace: A systematic review of the literature on higher education marketing. International Journal of Public Sector Management 19 (4): 316–338.Google Scholar
  25. Hensen, K.A., and M.C. Shelly. 2003. Impact of supplemental instruction: Results from a large, public, Midwestern university. The Journal of College Student Development 44 (2): 25–29.Google Scholar
  26. Hrastinski, S., and N.M. Aghaee. 2012. How are campus students using social media to support their studies? An explorative interview study. Education and Information Technologies 17 (4): 451–464.Google Scholar
  27. Huijser, H., L. Kimmins, and P. Evans. 2008. Peer assisted learning in fleximode: Developing an online learning community. Journal of Peer Learning 1 (1): 51–60.Google Scholar
  28. Knobe, M., R. Munker, R.M. Sellei, M. Holschen, S.C. Mooij, B. Schmidt-Rohlfing, F. Niethard, and H. Pape. 2010. Peer teaching: A randomized controlled trial using student-teachers to teach musculoskeletal ultrasound. Medical Education 44: 148–155.Google Scholar
  29. Komljenovic, J., and S.L. Robertson. 2016. The dynamics of ‘market-making’ in higher education. Journal of Education Policy 31 (5): 622–636.Google Scholar
  30. LaPointe, L., and M. Reisetter. 2008. Belonging online: Students’ perceptions of the value and efficacy of an online learning community. International Journal on E-Learning 7 (4): 641–665.Google Scholar
  31. Laurillard, D. 2013. Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Leask, B. 2009. Using formal and informal curricula to improve interactions between home and international students. Journal of Studies in International Education 13 (2): 205–221.Google Scholar
  33. Littlewood, W., and B. Yu. 2011. First language and target language in the foreign language classroom. Language Teaching 44 (1): 64–77.Google Scholar
  34. Liu, I.F., M.C. Chen, Y.S. Sun, D. Wible, and C.H. Kuo. 2010. Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect intention to use an online learning community. Computers & Education 54 (2): 600–610.Google Scholar
  35. Longfellow, E., S. May, L. Burke, and D. Marks-Maran. 2008. They had a way of helping that actually helped: A case study of a peer-assisted learning scheme. Teaching in Higher Education 13 (1): 93–105.Google Scholar
  36. Malm, J., L. Brynofors, and L. Morner. 2011. Improving student success in difficult engineering education courses through supplemental instruction (SI) – What is the impact of the degree of SI attendance? Journal of Peer Learning 4 (1): 16–23.Google Scholar
  37. Maor, D. 2003. The teacher’s role in developing interaction and reflection in an online learning community. Educational Media International 40 (1): 127–138.Google Scholar
  38. McCarthy, A., B. Smuts, and M. Cosser. 1997. Assessing the effectiveness of supplemental instruction: A critique and a case study. Studies in Higher Education 22 (2): 221–231.Google Scholar
  39. McDonald, E. 2014. University essay-writing scandal hits ACT. The Canberra Times, 12 Nov.Google Scholar
  40. Minnaert, A., M. Boekaerts, C. de Brabander, and M. Opdenakker. 2011. Students’ experiences of autonomy, competence, social relatedness and interest within a CSCL environment in vocational education: The case of commerce and business administration. Vocations and Learning 4: 175–190.Google Scholar
  41. Molesworth, M., E. Nixon, and R. Scullion. 2009. Having, being and higher education: The marketisation of the university and the transformation of the student into consumer. Teaching in Higher Education 14 (3): 277–287.Google Scholar
  42. Newman, S., K. Jahdi. 2009. Marketisation of education: Marketing, rhetoric and reality. Journal of Further and Higher Education 33(1): 1–11.Google Scholar
  43. OECD. 2011. Virtual worlds: Immersive online platforms for collaboration, creativity and learning, OECD digital economy papers, No. 184. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  44. Parkinson, M. 2009. The effect of peer assisted learning support (PALS) on performance in mathematics and chemistry. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 46 (4): 381–392.Google Scholar
  45. Ross, M., D. Grace, and W. Shao. 2013. Come on higher ed… get with the programme! A study of market orientation in international student recruitment. Educational Review 65 (2): 219–240.Google Scholar
  46. Saw, G., W. Abbott, J. Donaghey, and C. McDonald. 2013. Social media for international students–it’s not all about Facebook. Library Management 34 (3): 156–174.Google Scholar
  47. Sawir, E. 2005. Language difficulties on international students in Australia: The effects of prior learning experience. International Education Journal 6 (5): 567–580.Google Scholar
  48. Skalicky, J. 2008. Providing multiple opportunities for PASS leaders to reflect critically. Australasian Journal of Peer Learning 1 (1): 91–98.Google Scholar
  49. Sole, G., A. Rose, T. Bennett, K. Jaques, and Z. Rippon. 2012. A student experience of peer assisted study sessions in physiotherapy. Journal of Peer Learning 5 (1): 2–10.Google Scholar
  50. Stokes, A., and E. Wilson. 2011. Catering for individual student learning preferences in economics. American Journal of Business Education (AJBE) 2 (9): 41–482.Google Scholar
  51. Turnbull, M., and K. Arnett. 2002. Teachers’ uses of the target and first languages in second and foreign language classrooms. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 22: 204–218.Google Scholar
  52. University of Missouri-Kansas City (UMKC). n.d. Video-based supplemental instruction. http://www.umkc.edu/asm/vsi/docs/VSI-Information-Sheet.pdf. Accessed 12 Jun 2014.
  53. van der Meer, J., and C. Scott. 2009. Students’ experiences and perceptions of PASS: Towards ongoing improvement. Australasian Journal of Peer Learning 2 (1): 3–22.Google Scholar
  54. Wang, M., C. Sierra, and T. Folger. 2003. Building a dynamic online learning community among adult learners. Educational Media International 40 (1): 49–62.Google Scholar
  55. Wenger, E. 2010. Communities of practice and social learning systems: The career of a concept. In Social learning systems and communities of practice, 179–198. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  56. Wingate, U. 2007. A framework for transition: Supporting ‘learning to learn’ in higher education. Higher Education Quarterly 61 (3): 391–405.Google Scholar
  57. Yu, T.C., N.C. Wilson, P.P. Singh, D.P. Lemanu, S.J. Hawken, and A.G. Hill. 2011. Medical students-as-teachers: A systematic review of peer-assisted teaching during medical school. Advances in Medical Education and Practice 2: 157–172.Google Scholar
  58. Zaccagnini, M., and I. Verenikina. 2013. Peer assisted study sessions for postgraduate international students in Australia. Journal of Peer Learning 6 (1): 86–102 http://ro.uow.edu.au/ajpl/vol6/iss1/8.Google Scholar
  59. Zraa, W., M. Kavanagh, and R.T. Hartle. 2011. Teaching accounting in the new millennium. In Proceedings of the Cambridge Business and Economics Conference (CBEC), Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tairan Kevin Huang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jin Cui
    • 2
  • Corinne Cortese
    • 2
  • Matthew Pepper
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Accounting & Finance, Faculty of Business, Justice & Behavioural ScienceCharles Sturt UniversityPort MacquarieAustralia
  2. 2.School of Accounting, Economics & Finance, Faculty of BusinessUniversity of WollongongWollongongAustralia
  3. 3.School of Management, Operations & Marketing, Faculty of BusinessUniversity of WollongongWollongongAustralia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Raeal J. Moore
    • 1
  1. 1.Research DivisionACT, IncIowa CityUSA

Personalised recommendations