1:1 iPads in 1st Grade: Case Study of a Teacher’s Concerns and Implementation

  • Lauren EutslerEmail author
Living reference work entry


It is important to study technology acceptance of teachers to improve technology integration practices in the classroom. Framed by the Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM), this chapter reports the stages of concern and levels of use to accept one-to-one iPads by a first-grade teacher. Described as an alternative choice school for the community, this charter school is located in the southeast area of the USA and operates within the public school district. The classroom teacher sought out a university researcher for assistance with technology integration strategies, which led to a 2-year partnership. Monthly video chats, text from a dialogue journal, and student work artifacts generated data. Analysis of data revealed findings that propose a classroom teacher needs 2 years to advance through the seven stages of concern. The greatest concern is shown during the management stage. Additional data demonstrate barriers toward integrating the iPad, such as extensive time required to locate iPad applications. Strategies for moving across the CBAM are provided, along with apps the teacher found most useful.


Apps Classroom practice Elementary One-to-one iPads Technology acceptance 


  1. Aldunate, Roberto, and Miguel Nussbaum. 2013. Teacher adoption of technology. Computers in Human Behavior 29: 519–524. Scholar
  2. Casey, H., and G. Rakes. 2002. An analysis of teacher concerns towards instructional technology. International Journal of Educational Technology 3 (1). Accessed 17 July 2017.
  3. Cumming, Therese, C.D. Rodrıguez, and I. Strnadová. 2013. Aligning iPad applications with evidence-based practices in inclusive and special education. In Assistive technologies: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications, 397–420.Google Scholar
  4. Hall, Gene. 1976. The study of individual teacher and professor concerns about innovations. Journal of Teacher Education 27 (1): 22–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hall, Gene. 1979. The concerns-based approach to facilitating change. Educational Horizons 57 (4): 202–208.Google Scholar
  6. Hall, Gene, Richard Wallace Jr., and William Dosset. 1973. A developmental conceptualization of the adoption process with educational institutions. Austin: Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, The University of Texas.Google Scholar
  7. Hall, Gene, Susan Loucks, William Rutherford, and Beulah Newlove. 1975. Levels of use of the innovation: A framework for analyzing innovation adoption. Journal of Teacher Education 26 (1): 52–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Harper, Ben, and Natalie B. Milman. 2016. One-to-one technology in K–12 classrooms: A review of the literature from 2004 through 2014. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 48 (2): 129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Haßler, Bjoern, Louis Major, and Sara Hennessy. 2016. Tablet use in schools: A critical review of the evidence for learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 32 (2): 139–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hutchison, Amy, Beth Beschorner, and Denise Schmidt-Crawford. 2012. Exploring the use of the iPad for literacy learning. The Reading Teacher 66 (1): 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ifenthaler, Dirk, and Volker Schweinbenz. 2013. The acceptance of tablet-PCs in classroom instruction: The teachers’ perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior 29 (3): 525–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Koehler, Matthew, and Punya Mishra. 2009. What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 9 (1): 60–70.Google Scholar
  13. Krutka, Daniel G., and Jeffrey P. Carpenter. 2016. Why social media must have a place in schools. Kappa Delta Pi Record 52 (1): 6–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lu, Ya-Huei, Anne T. Ottenbreit-Leftwich, Ai-Chu Ding, and Krista Glazewski. 2017. Experienced iPad-using early childhood teachers: Practices in the one-to-one iPad classroom. Computers in the Schools 34 (1–2): 9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marich, Holly. 2016. Twitter in the elementary classroom: A teacher’s journey. Language Arts 94 (1): 67.Google Scholar
  16. McKnight, Katherine, Kimberly O’Malley, Roxanne Ruzic, Maria Kelly Horsley, John J. Franey, and Katherine Bassett. 2016. Teaching in a digital age: How educators use technology to improve student learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 48 (3): 194–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Neumann, Michelle M. 2016. Young children’s use of touch screen tablets for writing and reading at home: Relationships with emergent literacy. Computers & Education 97: 61–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Price, Sara, Carey Jewitt, and Lucrezia Crescenzi. 2015. The role of iPads in pre-school children’s mark making development. Computers & Education 87: 131–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Stokes-Beverley, Christine, and Ian Simoy. 2016. Advancing educational Technology in Teacher Preparation: Policy brief. Office of educational technology, US department of education. Accessed 17 July 2017.
  20. Toppel, Kathyrn. 2014. Accelerating learning: Making the most of iPads in kindergarten. IRA E-ssentials: 1–10.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of North TexasDentonUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Belinda Gimbert
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Educational StudiesThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations