Advertisement

Highs and Lows of Mobile Digital Technology Integration in Kindergarten

  • Monica McGlynn-StewartEmail author
  • Nicola Maguire
  • Emma Mogyorodi
  • Leah Brathwaite
  • Lisa Hobman
Living reference work entry

Abstract

This 2-year research study examined 27 kindergarten educators’ professional learning experiences using open-ended tablet applications to support children’s (aged 3–6 years) oral and visual literacy learning. In contrast to typical professional development initiatives, the educators in this study were treated like professionals with control over how the apps would be integrated into their daily pedagogical practice. The research team functioned as technical advisors, observers, and resource providers. Research team members ascertained educators’ levels of confidence, experience, and interests through regular interviews, questionnaires, and biweekly classroom visits. Annual workshops provided opportunities for educators to reflect and share insights. Over the 2 years, the educators experienced a series of highs and lows in response to their particular contexts. While they were initially confident about introducing the apps in their classrooms, technical and environmental challenges soon led to frustration. With time and ongoing support, educators worked through a series of challenges to develop deeper understandings of the technical and pedagogical issues related to digital technology (DT) integration. They came to appreciate the learning and teaching benefits of the apps, which provided them with additional tools to support children as they created, documented, and reflected on their learning. Moreover, the educators began to use the children’s digital work for assessment and planning purposes. This study illustrated how teacher learning in DT integration is complex and nonlinear, with different competencies and needs for support coming to the fore over time.

Keywords

Early childhood Professional development Literacy Digital technology iPad apps 

References

  1. Beschorner, B., and A. Hutchison. 2013. iPads as a literacy teaching tool in early childhood. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology 1: 16–24.Google Scholar
  2. Blackwell, C., A. Lauricella, and E. Wartella. 2014. Factors influencing digital technology use in early childhood education. Computers & Education 77: 82–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blagojevic, B., H. Brumer, S. Chevalier, A. O’Clair, and K. Thomes. 2012. Touch and grow: Learning and exploring using tablets. Teaching Young Children 6: 18–21.Google Scholar
  4. Blum, C., H.P. Parette, and E.H. Watts. 2009. Engaging young children in an emergent literacy curriculum using of Microsoft PowerPointTM: Development, considerations, and opportunities. In Research, reflections and innovations in integrating ICT in education, ed. A.M. Vilas, A.S. Martin, J.M. Gonza’lez, and J.A. Gonza’lez, 41–45. Badajoz: Formatex.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, C.P., J. Englehardt, and H. Mathers. 2016. Examining preservice teachers’ conceptual and practical understandings of adopting iPads into their teaching of young children. Teaching and Teacher Education 60: 179–190.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.08.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, J., and C. Chang. 2006. Testing the whole teacher approach to professional development: A study of early childhood teachers’ technology proficiency. Early Childhood Research and Practice 8: n1. http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v8n1/chen.html.Google Scholar
  7. Chen, B., K. Gallagher-Mackay, and A. Kidder. 2014. Digital learning in Ontario schools: The “new normal”. Toronto: People for Education. Web pdf. http://www.peopleforeducation.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/digital-learning-2014-WEB.pdf. Accessed 16 Nov 2017.Google Scholar
  8. Council on Communication and Media. 2016. Media and young minds. Pediatrics 138: 5.  https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-2591. Accessed 16 Nov 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Darling-Hammond, L. 2006a. Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  10. Darling-Hammond, L. 2006b. Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education 57: 300–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ertmer, P.A., and A. Ottenbreit-Leftwich. 2013. Removing obstacles to the pedagogical changes required by Jonassen’s vision of authentic technology-enabled learning. Computers & Education 64: 175–182.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compendu.2012.10.008. Accessed 17 Nov 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Falloon, G., and E. Khoo. 2014. Exploring young students’ talk in iPad-supported collaborative learning environments. Computers & Education 77: 13–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.008. Accessed 16 Nov 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fisher, D., N. Frey, and J. Nelson. 2012. Literacy achievement through sustained professional development. Reading Teacher 65: 551–563.  https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.01082. Accessed 16 Nov 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fleer, M. 2014. The demands and motives afforded through digital play in early childhood activity settings. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 3: 202–209.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2014.02.012. Accessed 17 Nov 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goodwin, K., and K. Highfield. 2012. iTouch and iLearn: An examination of “educational” apps. In Paper presented at the Early education and technology for children conference. Salt Lake City. 14–16 Mar 2012.Google Scholar
  16. Herro, D. 2015. Sustainable innovations: Bringing digital media and emerging technologies to the classroom. Theory Into Practice 54: 117–127.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2015.1010834. Accessed 16 Nov 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Keengwe, J., and G. Onchwari. 2009. Technology and early childhood education: A technology integration professional development model for practicing teachers. Early Childhood Education Journal 37: 209–218.  https://doi.org/10.1007/S10643-009-0341-0. Accessed 16 Nov 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kirkwood, A. 2009. E-learning: You don’t always get what you hope for. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 18: 107–121.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390902992576. Accessed 16 Nov 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Laffey, J. 2004. Appropriation, mastery and resistance to technology in early childhood preservice teacher education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 36: 361–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee, T.H., F.G. Wu, and H.T. Chen. 2017. Innovation & evaluation of tangible direct manipulation digital drawing pens for children. Applied Ergonomics 60: 207–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. National Association for the Education of Young Children and Fred Rogers Center for Early Learning and Children’s Media at Saint Vincent College. 2012. Technology and interactive media as tools in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. Web pdf. http://www.naeyc.org/files/naeyc/PS_technology_WEB.pdf. Accessed 16 Nov 2017.
  22. Neumann, M.M. 2016. Young children’s use of touch screen tablets for writing and reading at home: Relationships with emergent literacy. Computers & Education 97: 61–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.013. Accessed 16 Nov 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ontario Ministry of Education. 2016. The kindergarten program 2016. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Education. http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/elementary/kindergarten.html. Accessed 17 Nov 2017.Google Scholar
  24. Pacini-Ketchabaw, Veronica, et al. 2015. Journeys: Reconceptualizing early childhood practices through pedagogical narration. North York: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  25. Parette, H., A. Quesenberry, and C. Blum. 2010. Missing the boat with technology usage in early childhood settings: A 21st century view of developmentally appropriate practice. Early Childhood Education Journal 37: 335–343.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-009-0352-x. Accessed 16 Nov 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Radesky, J.S., J. Schumacher, and B. Zuckerman. 2015. Mobile and interactive media use by young children: The good, the bad, and the unknown. Pediatrics 135: 1–3.  https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-2251. Accessed 16 Nov 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rowsell, J., and D. Harwood. 2015. “Let It Go”: Exploring the image of the child as a producer, consumer, and inventor. Theory Into Practice 54: 136–146.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2015.1010847. Accessed 16 Nov 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wong, S.S. 2015. Mobile digital devices and preschoolers’ home multiliteracy practices. Language and Literacy 17: 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yilmaz, R.M. 2016. Educational magic toys developed with augmented reality technology for early childhood education. Computers in Human Behavior 54: 240–248.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.040. Accessed 16 Nov 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Monica McGlynn-Stewart
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nicola Maguire
    • 2
  • Emma Mogyorodi
    • 3
  • Leah Brathwaite
    • 2
  • Lisa Hobman
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Early ChildhoodGeorge Brown CollegeTorontoCanada
  2. 2.George Brown CollegeTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Ryerson UniversityTorontoUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Belinda Gimbert
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Educational StudiesThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations