Advertisement

Learning from Social Impact Games to Support Integration into Middle School Classrooms

  • Renee E. Jackson
  • Emily Sheepy
Living reference work entry

Abstract

Video games known interchangeably as social justice, social impact, or social change games hold great potential for integration into classroom learning. They are promising particularly because they tend to be easy to play, are free or inexpensive, and, given that they address social justice-related issues in various ways, can be more easily integrated with curricular goals for teachers who may not have much gaming experience. Drawing from two qualitative research projects, with female youth ages 11–14 (n = 74; n = 11), and centered around one particular game, Get Water!, guidelines are considered for game design intended for classroom use and informal learning, approaches toward assessment of learning, and suggestions for effective instructional practice. With girls at the middle school level in particular, building relationships with video games is important, as video games are considered by many scholars to be one way of developing or maintaining an interest and comfort with technology at a young age, in a world where technology and video game domains continue to be dominated by men. Informed by studies with girls, the purpose of this qualitative synthesis is to reflect on strategies for integrating casual games that can be played and understood reasonably quickly in learning contexts, yet are also in line with student-centered learning and goals related to the twenty-first-century learning trend, such as critical thinking, creativity, and collaboration.

Keywords

Video games Social impact games Social change games Social justice Classroom integration Twenty-first-century learning Progressive education Social science Technology Gender Critical citizenship education 

References

  1. Ausubel, D. 1966. The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. Orlando: Grune & Stratton (Italian edition, 1966).Google Scholar
  2. Baytak, A., and S. Land. 2011. Advancing elementary school girls’ programming through game design. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology 3 (1): 244–253.Google Scholar
  3. Boudreault, F.A., J. Haga, B. Paylor, A. Sabourin, S. Thomas, and C. Van der The School. 2013. Future tense: Adapting Canadian education systems for the 21st century (rep.). Ontario: Action Canada.Google Scholar
  4. Bourgonjon, J., F. De Grove, C. De Smet, J. Van Looy, R. Soetaert, and M. Valcke. 2013. Acceptance of game-based learning by secondary school teachers. Computers & Education 67: 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brammer, L., R. Dumlao, A. Falk, E. Hollander, E. Knutson, J. Poehnert, A. Politano, and V. Werner. 2012. Core competencies in civic engagement [Center for engagement democracy working paper]. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.merrimack.edu/ced_pubs/1.
  6. Brown, H.J. (2008). Videogames and education. New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, C. n.d.. Patterns of innovation: Showcasing the nation’s best at 21st century learning. Retrieved from: http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/exemplars/P21_Patterns_of_Innovation_Final.pdf.
  8. C21Canada (Canadians for 21st Century Learning and Innovation). 2015. Shifting minds 3.0: Redefining the learning landscape in Canada. Canada: Penny Milton.Google Scholar
  9. Carnegie Corporation of New York, & CIRCLE: The Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement. 2003. The civic mission of schools. New York: CIRCLE.Google Scholar
  10. Clark, D.B., E.E. Tanner-Smith, and S.S. Killingsworth. 2016. Digital games, design, and learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 86 (1): 79–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark, D.B., E. Tanner-Smith, A. Hostetler, A. Fradkin, and V. Polikov. 2017. Substantial integration of typical educational games into extended curricula. Journal of the Learning Sciences.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1333431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Connolly, T.M., E.A. Boyle, E. MacArthur, and J.M. Boyle. 2012. A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers and Education 59: 661–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Consalvo, M. 2003. It’s a queer world after all: studying the sims and sexuality. Retrieved from: http://archive.glaad.org/documents/csms/The_Sims.pdf
  14. Costandius, E., M. Blackie, B. Leibowitz, I. Nell, R. Malgas, S.O. Rosochacki, and G. Young. 2015. Stumbling over the first hurdle? Exploring notions of critical citizenship. In The palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher education, 545–558. Springer. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-37805-7_32.
  15. Dahya, N. 2008. Videogames for education and social change: Examining representation and learning in serious and persuasive digital-games. Master’s Thesis. Retrieved from ProQuest (978-0-494-45929-4).Google Scholar
  16. Darabian, N. 2013. Gaming for social change: The making of an app. for charity water. Retrieved 12 July 2017, from https://www.good.is/articles/gaming-for-social-change-the-making-of-an-app-for-charity-waer.
  17. Dasgupta, P., K. Tureski, R. Lenzi, K. Bindu, and G. Nanda. 2012. Half the sky movement multimedia communication initiative: An evaluation of the 9-minutes mobile game and video. Washington, DC: C-Change/FHI 360.Google Scholar
  18. Decode Global 2012. Get Water!, app, ipad/iphone and Android, Decode Global in Montréal CanadaGoogle Scholar
  19. Decode Global 2017. Get Water!, app, ipad/iphone and Android, SylvanPlay in Hunt Valley, MD. The video game is no longer availableGoogle Scholar
  20. Delamere, F.M. and Shaw, S.M. 2008. They see it as a guys game: The politics of gender in digital games. Leisure/Loisir 32 (2): 279–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dewey, J. 1916. Democracy and education. New York: The MacMillan Company.Google Scholar
  22. Dewey, J. 1990. The school and society & the child and the curriculum. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press (Original work published 1900 & 1902).Google Scholar
  23. Dewey, J. 1998. Experience and education: The 60th anniversary edition. West Lafayette: Kappa Delta Pi (Original work published 1938).Google Scholar
  24. Education Sector. 2008. Measuring skills for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Silva.Google Scholar
  25. Games for Change. n.d.. Who are we. Retrieved from http://www.gamesforchange.org/who-we-are/.
  26. Games for Change Conference. n.d. Retrieved September 01, 2017, from http://www.gdconf.com/conference/gamesforchange.html.
  27. Gee, J.P. 2003. What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harvey, A. 2011. Constituting the player: Feminist technoscience, gender, and digital play. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology 3 (1): 171–184.Google Scholar
  29. Jackson, R., and A. Mandrona. 2018. Video game depictions of rural childhood in the Global South: Get Water! and Ayiti the Cost of Life. In Visual Encounters in the Study of Rural Childhoods, eds. A. Mandrona & C. Mitchell, New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Jansz, J., and R.G. Martis. 2007. The Lara phenomenon: Powerful female characters in video games. Sex Roles 56: 141–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jenkins, H. 1997. Empowering children in the digital age: Towards a radical media pedagogy. The Radical Researcher 50: 30–35.Google Scholar
  32. Jenson, J., S. de Castell, and S. Fisher. 2007. Girls playing games: Rethinking stereotypes. Proceedings from Future Play: November 15–17.Google Scholar
  33. Jenson, J., S. Fisher, and S. de Castell. 2011. Disrupting the gender order: Levelling up and claiming space in an after-school video game club. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology 3 (1): 149–169.Google Scholar
  34. Johnson, L., and P. Morris. 2010. Towards a framework for critical citizenship education. The Curriculum Journal 21 (1): 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kahne, J. E., and Sporte, S. E. 2008. Developing citizens: The impact of civic learning opportunities on students’ commitment to civic participation. American Educational Research Journal, 45(3): 738–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kahne, J., E. Middaugh, and C. Evans. 2009. The civic potential of video games. Chicago: MacArthur Foundation Retrieved from http://www.digitallearning.macfound.org.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kain, E. 2014. Gamergate: A closer look at the controversy sweeping video games. Forbes. Retrieved from: http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2014/09/04/gamergate-a-closer-look-at-the-controversysweeping-video-games/
  38. Kirriemuir, J., and A. McFarlane. 2004. Report 8: Literature review in games and learning. Bristol: FutureLab.Google Scholar
  39. Knox, A. 2006. Why American business demands twenty-first century learning: A company perspective. New Directions for Youth Development 110: 31–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Leonard, D. 2003. “Live in your world, play in ours”: Race, video games and consumer the other. Studies in Media and Information Literacy Education 3 (4): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ma, M., A. Oikonomou, and L.C. Jain, eds. 2011. Serious games and edutainment applications. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  42. McTighe, J., and G. Wiggins. 2013. Essential questions: Opening doors to student understanding. Alexandria: ASCD =.Google Scholar
  43. Micheal, D., and S. Chen. 2006. Serious games: Games that educate, train and inform. Boston: Thomson Course Technology.Google Scholar
  44. National Council for the Social Studies. 2010. National curriculum standards for social studies: Standards. Retrieved 20 July 2016, from http://www.socialstudies.org/standards/.
  45. Nehring, J.H., and S. Szczesiul. 2015. Redefining high performance in Northern Ireland: Deeper learning and twenty-first century skills meet high stakes accountability. Journal for Educational Change 16: 327–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Newswire. 2003. Business and education leaders articulate vision for 21st century learning: Report offers recommendations and tools to prepare students for real world [press release]. Retrieved from http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/businessand-Education-leaders-articulate-vision-for-21st-century-learning-report-offersrecommendations-And-tools-to-prepare-students-for-real-world-71439287.html.
  47. Nielson. 2014. Multi-platform gaming for the win!. Accessed December 2, 2016. http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/news/2014/multi-platform-gaming-for-the-win.html.
  48. Niemi, R.G., and J. Junn. 2005. Civic education: What makes students learn. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Nussbaum, M. 2002. Education for citizenship in an era of global connection. Studies in Philosophy and Education 21 (4): 289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. P21(Partnership for 21st Century Skills). 2011. Framework for 21st century learning. Retrieved from: www.p21.org/our-work/p21-framework.
  51. Pearlman, B. 2006. Twenty-first century learning in schools: A case study of new technology high school in Napa California. New Directions for Youth Development, (110): 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Premier Technology Council. 2010. A vision for 21st century education. Vancouver: BC government.Google Scholar
  53. Q2L. 2009. Quest to learn. Retrieved from http://q2l.org/about.
  54. Romero, M., Usart, M., and Ott, M. 2015. Can serious games contribute to developing and sustaining 21st century skills?. Games and Culture, 10(2): 148–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ruffo-Tepper, R. 2015. Assessing students as they play: Examples of creative ways teachers use games for assessment. Edutopia. Retrieved from: https://www.edutopia.org/blog/using-games-for-assessment-rebecca-rufo-tepper.
  56. Salen, K., R. Torres, L. Wolozin, R. Rufo-Tepper, and A. Shapiro. 2011. Quest to learn, developing the school for digital kids. The MacArthur Foundation reports on digital media and learning.Google Scholar
  57. Salpeter, J. 2008. 21st century learning skills: Will our students be prepared? Technology and learning. Retrieved from http://www.techlearning.com/news/0002/21st-century-skillswill-our-students-be-prepared/64781.
  58. Schulz, W., J. Ainley, J. Fraillon, B. Losito, and G. Agrusti. 2016. IEA international civic and citizenship education study 2016: Assessment framework. S.l. Amsterdam: The International Association for Evaluation of Educational Achievement.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schwartz, E., and D. Stolow. 2006. Twenty-first century learning in afterschool. New Directions for Youth Development 110: 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sheepy, E., & R. Jackson. 2015. Issues and opportunities in learning with social impact video games. In EdMedia: World conference on educational media and technology (Vol. 2015, No. 1, 1317–1322).Google Scholar
  61. Sheepy, E., and D. Waddington. 2015b. Learning outcomes in adults playing and self-debriefing Get Water!, a game for change. Poster presentation prepared for the Games, Learning, and Society Conference (July, 2015), Madison.Google Scholar
  62. Squire, K. 2004. Replaying history: Learning world history through playing civilization III. Doctoral Dissertation. Retrieved from http://website.education.wisc.edu/kdsquire/dissertation.html.
  63. Squire, K. 2011. Video games and learning: Teaching and participatory culture in the digital age, Technology, Education – Connections (the TEC Series). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  64. Takeuchi, L.M., and S. Vaala. 2014. Level up learning: A national survey on teaching with digital games. New York: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop.Google Scholar
  65. Walkerdine, V. 2007. Children, gender, video games: Towards a relational approach to multimedia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Whitson, J.R., and C. Dormann. 2011. Social gaming for change: Facebook unleashed. First Monday 16 (10).Google Scholar
  67. Wilson, J.I. 2006. Twenty-first century learning for teachers: Helping educators bring new skills into the classroom. New Directions for Youth Development 110: 149–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Temple UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Concordia UniversityMontréalCanada

Section editors and affiliations

  • Rob Power
    • 1
  1. 1.Athabasca UniversityVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations