Advertisement

Best Practice in Communicating Uncertainties in Flood Management in the USA

  • Robert K. Hartman
Reference work entry

Abstract

Ensemble forecasting has gained a great deal of popularity for addressing and estimating uncertainty associated with both meteorologic and hydrologic forecasts over the past decade. While ensemble-based hydrologic forecasts have been in routine operations for longer-term forecasts for many years, the notion of short- and medium-term probabilistic forecasts in support of water and flood management efforts is relatively new and is a developing science and service. Approaches to effectively conveying and communicating hydrologic forecast uncertainty are being actively developed and vetted with potential user communities. Important experience and insight will be gained over the next few years as the community of developers, forecasters, and end users work to leverage probabilistic forecasts in a risk-based decision environment. With proper focus and support, these efforts have the potential to significantly improve flood, ecosystems, and water management with benefits to multiple sectors of our society.

Keywords

Ensemble Communication Probability Risk Uncertainty Hydrology Water resources Hindcasting 

References

  1. J.D. Brown, J. Demargne, D.-J. Seo, Y. Liu, The Ensemble Verification System (EVS): a software tool for verifying ensemble forecasts of hydrometeorologic and hydrologic variables at discrete locations. Environ. Model Software 25, 854–872 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. G.N. Day, Extended streamflow forecasting using NWSRFS. J. Water Resour. Plan Manag. 111, 157–170 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. J. Demargne, L. Wu, S.K. Regonda, J.D. Brown, H. Lee, M. He, D.-J. Seo, R. Hartman, H.D. Herr, M. Fresch, J. Schaake, Y. Zhu, The science of NOAA’s operational hydrologic ensemble forecast service. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 95, 79–98 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. D.C. Garen, Improved techniques in regression-based streamflow volume forecasting. J. Water. Resour. Plan Manag. Am. Soc. Civil Eng. 118(6), 654–670 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. K.P. Georgakakos, N.E. Graham, A.P. Georgakakos, H. Yao, Demonstrating Integrated Forecast and Reservoir Mangement (INFORM) for Northern California in an operational environment. IAHS Publ. 313, 1–6 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. T.M. Hamill, G.T. Bates, J.S. Whitaker, D.R. Murray, M. Fiorino, T.J. Galarneau, Y. Zhu, W. Lapenta, NOAA’s second generation global medium-range ensemble reforecast dataset. Bull. Am. Meteorol. .Soc. 94, 1553–1565 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. National Research Council of the National Academies, Completing the Forecast: Characterizing and Communicating Uncertainty for Better Decisions Using Weather and Climate Forecasts (The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2006), p. 124Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.California-Nevada River Forecast CenterNOAA, National Weather ServiceSacramentoUSA

Personalised recommendations