Advertisement

Conjoined Twins

  • Juan A. TovarEmail author
Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history

Abstract

Monozygotic, monochorionic, and isosexual twins united by a part of their anatomy are known as Conjoined Twins. This is a rare and fascinating malformation that represents one of the more complex challenges of pediatric surgery. The twins are classified into two main groups: asymmetric and symmetric. Asymmetric ones are acardius acephalus, fetus-in-fetu, or heteropagus twins. In all these, only one component, the autositus supplying circulation, is viable. Symmetric twins are designated craniopagus, thoracopagus, omphalopagus, rachiopagus, ischiopagus, pygopagus, or parapagus according to the location of the joining bridge. This can be large and often contains shared organs. The cardiovascular systems of both components of the set are communicated and the internal environment is also shared to a variable extent.

Mortality is high before and after birth because of frequent and severe associated malformations. Viability of separation is difficult to determine and requires sophisticated imaging studies. Separation not only involves lengthy and complex operations but also difficult ethical decisions with familial, medical, and even court participation.

Separation, when possible, requires various groups of specialists under a strong leadership. Bony parts, nervous system, hearts, great vessels, digestive and genitourinary organs, as well as the skin and musculoskeletal tissues have to be divided and reconstructed to achieve separation with preservation for each component of as much function as possible. Survival is nearly impossible when the hearts are united, but it is possible for one or both twins in all the other forms. Complications are frequent and long-term quality of life is often burdened by fecal and urinary incontinence or by abnormal limbs and genitalia that are the price to pay for separation.

The quality of a pediatric surgical group is heavily put to test by these cases that can only be managed when outstanding expertise is available in the various specialties involved.

Keywords

Conjoined Twin Acardius Acephalus Heteropagus Parasitic Craniopagus Thoracopagus Omphalopagus Ischiopagus Pygopagus Parapagus Separation Ethics 

References

  1. Abubakar AM, Ahidjo A, Chinda JY, Tahir C, Abubakar S, Adamu SA, Pindiga UH. The epigastric heteropagus conjoined twins. J Pediatr Surg. 2011;46(2):417–20. Epub 2011/02/05PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnold J, Luton A, Davies J. Introduction: Unique challenges in the care of conjoined twins. Semin Perinatol. 2018;42(6):319–320.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Al Rabeeah A. Conjoined twins – past, present, and future. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41(5):1000–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrews RE, McMahon CJ, Yates RW, Cullen S, de Leval MR, Kiely EM, Spitz L, Sullivan ID. Echocardiographic assessment of conjoined twins. Heart. 2006;92(3):382–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Atkinson L. Ethics and conjoined twins. Childs Nerv Syst. 2004;20(8-9):504–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Baken L, Rousian M, Kompanje EJ, et al. Diagnostic techniques and criteria for first-trimester conjoined twin documentation: a review of the literature illustrated by three recent cases. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2013;68:743.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhansali M, Sharma DB, Raina VK. Epigastric heteropagus twins: 3 case reports with review of literature. J Pediatr Surg. 2005;40(7):1204–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Boudreaux AM, Tilden SJ. Ethical dilemmas for pediatric surgical patients. Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 2002;20(1):227–40.Google Scholar
  9. Brizot ML, Liao AW, Lopes LM, Okumura M, Marques MS, Krebs V, Schultz R, Zugaib M. Conjoined twins pregnancies: experience with 36 cases from a single center. Prenat Diagn. 2011;31(12):1120–5. Epub 2011/09/10PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Browd SR, Goodrich JT, Walker ML. Craniopagus twins. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2008;1(1):1–20. Epub 2008/03/21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Carton AJ, Gomez F, Garcia-Guereta L, Martinez L, Tovar JA, Gutierrez-Larraya F. A rhythm by two players: ECG tracing found in conjoined twins. Rev Port Cardiol. 2011;30(11):865–6. Epub 2011/10/28PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen Y, Huang ZW, Liu M, Wang JQ, Cai L, Cao CX. Preoperative evaluation of possible cross-circulation in conjoined twins by hepatobiliary scintigraphy. Clin Nucl Med. 2011;36(12):e202–3. Epub 2011/11/09PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Chiu CT, Hou SH, Lai HS, Lee PH, Lin FY, Chen WJ, Chen MT, Lin TW, Chu SH. Separation of thoracopagus conjoined twins. A case report. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;35(5):459–62.Google Scholar
  14. Cywes S, Millar AJ, Rode H, Brown RA. Conjoined twins – the Cape Town experience. Pediatr Surg Int. 1997;12(4):234–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. el Gohary MA. Siamese twins in the United Arab Emirates. Pediatr Surg Int. 1998;13(2-3):154–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Fieggen AG, Dunn RN, Pitcher RD, Millar AJ, Rode H, Peter JC. Ischiopagus and pygopagus conjoined twins: neurosurgical considerations. Childs Nerv Syst. 2004;20(8–9):640–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Fishman SJ, Puder M, Geva T, Jenkins K, Ziegler MM, Shamberger RC. Cardiac relocation and chest wall reconstruction after separation of thoracopagus conjoined twins with a single heart. J Pediatr Surg. 2002;37(3):515–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gillon R. Imposed separation of conjoined twins – moral hubris by the English courts? J Med Ethics. 2001;27(1):3–4.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Holcomb 3rd GW, Keating MA, Hollowell JG, Murphy JP, Duckett JW. Continent urinary reconstruction in ischiopagus tripus conjoined twins. J Urol. 1989;141(1):100–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaufman MH. The embryology of conjoined twins. Childs Nerv Syst. 2004;20(8-9):508–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kiely EM, Spitz L. The separation procedure. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2015;24(5):231–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim SS, Waldhausen JH, Weidner BC, Grady R, Mitchell M, Sawin R. Perineal reconstruction of female conjoined twins. J Pediatr Surg. 2002;37(12):1740–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kingston CA, McHugh K, Kumaradevan J, Kiely EM, Spitz L. Imaging in the preoperative assessment of conjoined twins. Radiographics. 2001;21(5):1187–208.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kobylarz K. History of treatment of conjoined twins. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2014;46(2):116–123.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lai HS, Chu SH, Lee PH, Chen WJ. Unbalanced cross circulation in conjoined twins. Surgery. 1997;121(5):591–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lazarus J, Raad J, Rode H, Millar A. Long-term urological outcomes in six sets of conjoined twins. J Pediatr Urol. 2011;7(5):520–5. Epub 2010/10/12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee M, Gosain AK, Becker D. The bioethics of separating conjoined twins in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(4):328e–34e. Epub 2011/09/17PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Logrono R, Garcia-Lithgow C, Harris C, Kent M, Meisner L. Heteropagus conjoined twins due to fusion of two embryos: report and review. Am J Med Genet. 1997;73(3):239–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Lopes LM, Brizot ML, Schultz R, Liao AW, Krebs VL, Francisco RP, Zugaib M. Twenty-five years of fetal echocardiography in conjoined twins: lessons learned. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013;26(5):530–8. Epub 2013/04/09PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Marin-Padilla M, Chin AJ, Marin-Padilla TM. Cardiovascular abnormalities in thoracopagus twins. Teratology. 1981;23(1):101–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Martinez L, Fernandez J, Pastor I, Garcia-Guereta L, Lassaletta L, Tovar JA. The contribution of modern imaging to planning separation strategies in conjoined twins. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2003;13(2):120–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Martinez-Frias ML. Conjoined twins presenting with different sex: description of a second case that truly represents the earliest historical evidence in humans. Am J Med Genet A. 2009;149A(7):1595–6. Epub 2009/06/18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Martinez-Frias ML, Bermejo E, Mendioroz J, Rodriguez-Pinilla E, Blanco M, Egues J, Felix V, Garcia A, Huertas H, Nieto C, Lopez JA, Lopez S, Paisan L, Rosa A, Vazquez MS. Epidemiological and clinical analysis of a consecutive series of conjoined twins in Spain. J Pediatr Surg. 2009;44(4):811–20. Epub 2009/04/14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Mathew RP, Francis S, Basti RS, et al. Conjoined twins – role of imaging and recent advances. J Ultrason. 2017;17(71):259–266.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Mian A, Gabra NI, Sharma T, et al. Conjoined twins: from conception to separation, a review. Clin Anat. 2017;30(3):385–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. McHugh K, Kiely EM, Spitz L. Imaging of conjoined twins. Pediatr Radiol. 2006;36(9):899–910.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. McLorie GA, Khoury AE, Alphin T. Ischiopagus twins: an outcome analysis of urological aspects of repair in 3 sets of twins. J Urol. 1997;157(2):650–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. McMahon CJ, Spencer R. Congenital heart defects in conjoined twins: outcome after surgical separation of thoracopagus. Pediatr Cardiol. 2006;27(1):1–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Melo A, Dinis R, Portugal A, et al. Early prenatal diagnosis of parapagus conjoined twins. Clin Pract. 2018;8(2):1039.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Meyers RL, Matlak ME. Biliary tract anomalies in thoraco-omphalopagus conjoined twins. J Pediatr Surg. 2002;37(12):1716–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Mutchinick OM, Luna-Munoz L, Amar E, Bakker MK, Clementi M, Cocchi G, da Graca Dutra M, Feldkamp ML, Landau D, Leoncini E, Li Z, Lowry B, Marengo LK, Martinez-Frias ML, Mastroiacovo P, Metneki J, Morgan M, Pierini A, Rissman A, Ritvanen A, Scarano G, Siffel C, Szabova E, Arteaga-Vazquez J. Conjoined twins: a worldwide collaborative epidemiological study of the international clearinghouse for birth defects surveillance and research. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2011;157C(4):274–87. Epub 2011/10/18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Ohashi A, Tsuji S, Kuroyanagi Y, Kinoshita Y, Kaneko K, Mine K, Hamada Y, Inagaki T. Multidetector computed tomography angiography for successful surgical separation in pygopagus conjoined twins. Pediatr Int. 2012;54(1):150–2. Epub 2012/02/18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Pierro A, Kiely EM, Spitz L. Classification and clinical evaluation. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2015;24(5):207–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Powis M, Spitz L, Pierro A. Differential energy metabolism in conjoined twins. J Pediatr Surg. 1999;34(7):1115–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Rode H, Fieggen AG, Brown RA, Cywes S, Davies MR, Hewitson JP, Hoffman EB, Jee LD, Lawrenson J, Mann MD, Matthews LS, Millar AJ, Numanoglu A, Peter JC, Thomas J, Wainwright H. Four decades of conjoined twins at Red Cross Children’s Hospital – lessons learned. S Afr Med J. 2006;96(9 Pt 2):931–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Rubini G, Paradies G, Leggio A, D’Addabbo A. Scintigraphy in assessment of the feasibility of separation of a set of xipho-omphalopagous conjoined twins. Clin Nucl Med. 1995;20(12):1074–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Spencer R. Anatomic description of conjoined twins: a plea for standardized terminology. J Pediatr Surg. 1996;31(7):941.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Spencer R. Theoretical and analytical embryology of conjoined twins: part I: embryogenesis. Clin Anat. 2000a;13(1):36–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Spencer R. Theoretical and analytical embryology of conjoined twins: part II: adjustments to union. Clin Anat. 2000b;13(2):97–120.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Spencer R. Parasitic conjoined twins: external, internal (fetuses in fetu and teratomas), and detached (acardiacs). Clin Anat. 2001;14(6):428–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Spencer R. Conjoined twins. Developmental malformations and clinical implications. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 2003. 476 p.Google Scholar
  52. Spitz L, Kiely EM. Conjoined twins. JAMA. 2003;289(10):1307–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Spitz L. Ethics in the management of conjoined twins. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2015;24(5):263–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Staffenberg DA, Goodrich JT. Separation of craniopagus conjoined twins with a staged approach. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23(7 Suppl 1):2004–10. Epub 2012/11/21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Szmuk P, Rabb MF, Curry B, Smith KJ, Lantin-Hermoso MR, Ezri T. Anaesthetic management of thoracopagus twins with complex cyanotic heart disease for cardiac assessment: special considerations related to ventilation and cross-circulation. Br J Anaesth. 2006;96(3):341–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Tannuri AC, Batatinha JA, Velhote MC, Tannuri U. Conjoined twins: twenty years’ experience at a reference center in Brazil. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013;68(3):371–7. Epub 2013/05/07Google Scholar
  57. Thomas Collins 2nd R, Weinberg PM, Gruber PJ, St John Sutton MG. Conjoined hearts in thoracopagus twins. Pediatr Cardiol. 2012;33(2):252–7. Epub 2012/01/25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Thomas JM, Lopez JT. Conjoined twins – the anaesthetic management of 15 sets from 1991-2002. Paediatr Anaesth. 2004;14(2):117–29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Tovar JA. Conjoined twins. In: Puri P, Höllwarth ME, editors. PediatricSurgery: diagnosis and management. Heidelberg: Springer; 2009.Google Scholar
  60. Tovar JA. Conjoined twins. In: Puri P, editor. Newborn surgery. 3rd ed. London. Hoddar Arnold; 2011.Google Scholar
  61. van der Weiden RM. The first successful separation of conjoined twins (1689). Twin Res. 2004;7(2):125–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Votteler TP, Lipsky K. Long-term results of 10 conjoined twin separations. J Pediatr Surg. 2005;40(4):618–29.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Pediatric SurgeryHospital Universitario La Paz, Universidad Autonoma de MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations