Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering

2015 Edition
| Editors: Michael Beer, Ioannis A. Kougioumtzoglou, Edoardo Patelli, Siu-Kui Au

Stochastic Ground Motion Simulation

  • Sanaz RezaeianEmail author
  • Xiaodan Sun
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35344-4_239

Synonyms

Earthquake ground motion simulation; Nonstationary stochastic process; Stochastic models; Strong ground motion simulation; Synthetic accelerograms

Introduction

Strong earthquake ground motion records are fundamental in engineering applications. Ground motion time series are used in  response-history dynamic analysis of structural or geotechnical systems. In such analysis, the validity of predicted responses depends on the validity of the input excitations. Ground motion records are also used to develop ground motion prediction equations (GMPEs) for intensity measures such as spectral accelerations that are used in  response-spectrum dynamic analysis. Despite the thousands of available strong ground motion records, there remains a shortage of records for large-magnitude earthquakes at short distances or in specific regions, as well as records that sample specific combinations of source, path, and site characteristics. The limited number of recordings has become problematic in...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgment

We would like to thank Mayssa Dabaghi, Morgan Moschetti, Ricardo Taborda, and the anonymous reviewer of this entry for their review and valuable feedback. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US government.

References

  1. Aki K (1967) Scaling law of seismic spectrum. J Geophys Res 72:1217–1231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Au SK, Beck JL (2003) Subset simulation and its applications to seismic risk based on dynamic analysis. J Eng Mech ASCE 129:901–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beresnev IA, Atkinson G (1998) Stochastic finite-fault modeling of ground motions from the 1994 northridge, California, earthquake (I): validation on rock sites. Bull Seismol Soc Am 88(6):1392–1401Google Scholar
  4. Boore DM (2003) Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method. Pure Appl Geophys 160:635–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boore DM (1983) Stochastic simulation of high-frequency ground motions based on seismological models of the radiated spectra. Bull Seismol Soc Am. 73:1865–1894Google Scholar
  6. Boore DM (2009) Comparing stochastic point-source and finite-source ground-motion simulations: SMSIM and EXSIM. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99:3202–3216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Conte JP, Peng BF (1997) Fully nonstationary analytical earthquake ground-motion model. J Eng Mech ASCE 12:15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Conte JP, Pister KS, Mahin SA (1992) Nonstationary ARMA modeling of seismic motions. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 11:411–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dabaghi M, Rezaeian S, Der Kiureghian A (2011) Stochastic simulation of near-fault ground motions for specified earthquake and site characteristics. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on applications of statistics and probability in civil engineering (ICASP11), Zurich, pp 759–760Google Scholar
  10. Der Kiureghian A, Fujimura K (2009) Nonlinear stochastic dynamic analysis for performance-based earthquake engineering. Earthq Eng Struct 38:719–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Housner GW, Jennings PC (1964) Generation of artificial earthquakes. J Eng Mech Div ASCE 90:113–150Google Scholar
  12. Konakli K, Der Kiureghian A (2012) Simulation of spatially varying ground motions including incoherence, wave-passage and differential site-response effects. Earthq Eng Struct 41:495–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Konakli K, Der Kiureghian A, Dreger D (2014) Coherency analysis of accelerograms recorded by the UPSAR array during the 2004 Parkfield earthquake. Earthq Eng Struct 43:641–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liao S, Zerva A (2006) Physically compliant, conditionally simulated spatially variable seismic ground motions for performance-based design. Earthq Eng Struct 35:891–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lin YK (1986) On random pulse train and its evolutionary spectral representation. Probabilist Eng Mech 1:219–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu SC (1970) Synthesis of stochastic representations of ground motions. Bell Sys Tech J 49:521–541zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mavroeidis GP, Papageorgiou AS (2003) A mathematical representation of near-fault ground motions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93(3):1099–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McGuire RK, Hanks TC (1980) RMS accelerations and spectral amplitude of strong ground motion during the San Fernando, California, earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 70(5):1907–1919Google Scholar
  19. Motazedian D, Atkinson GM (2005) Stochastic finite-fault modeling based on a dynamic corner frequency. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95(3):995–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Papadimitriou K (1990) Stochastic characterization of strong ground motion and application to structural response. Earthquake Engineering Research Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, Report No. EERL 90–03Google Scholar
  21. Penzien J, Watabe M (1975) Characteristics of 3-dimensional earthquake ground motions. Earthq Eng Struct 3:365–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rezaeian S, Der Kiureghian A (2008) A stochastic ground motion model with separable temporal and spectral nonstationarities. Earthq Eng Struct 37:1565–1584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rezaeian S, Der Kiureghian A (2010) Simulation of synthetic ground motions for specified earthquake and site characteristics. Earthq Eng Struct 39:1155–1180Google Scholar
  24. Rezaeian S, Der Kiureghian A (2012) Simulation of orthogonal horizontal ground motion components for specified earthquake and site characteristics. Earthq Eng Struct 41:335–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sabetta F, Pugliese A (1996) Estimation of response spectra and simulation of nonstationary earthquake ground motions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86:337–352Google Scholar
  26. Saragoni GR, Hart GC (1974) Simulation of artificial earthquakes. Earthq Eng Struct 2:249–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shinozuka M, Deodatis G (1988) Stochastic process models for earthquake ground motion. Probabilist Eng Mech 3:114–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shinozuka M, Sato Y (1967) Simulation of nonstationary random process. J Eng Mech ASCE 93:11–40Google Scholar
  29. Somerville P, Collins N, Abrahamson N, Graves R, Saikia C (2001) Ground motion attenuation relations for the Central and Eastern United States – Final report, 30 June 2001: Report to U.S. Geological Survey for award 99HQGR0098, 38 pGoogle Scholar
  30. Stafford PJ, Sgobba S, Marano GC (2009) An energy-based envelope function for the stochastic simulation of earthquake accelerograms. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 29:1123–1133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yeh CH, Wen YK (1990) Modeling of nonstationary ground motion and analysis of inelastic structural response. Struct Safety 8:281–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zerva A (1988) Seismic source mechanisms and ground motion models, review paper. Probabilist Eng Mech 3:64–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.U.S. Geological SurveyGoldenUSA
  2. 2.Southwest Jiaotong UniversityChengduChina