Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering

2015 Edition
| Editors: Michael Beer, Ioannis A. Kougioumtzoglou, Edoardo Patelli, Siu-Kui Au

Seismic Design of Tunnels

  • Youssef M. A. HashashEmail author
  • Maria Ines Romero-Arduz
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35344-4_1

Synonyms

Cut-and-cover structures; Earthquakes; Free-field deformations; Immersed-tube tunnels; Nonlinear response; Racking; Soil-structure interaction; Tunnels

Introduction

The complete enclosure in soil or rock makes their seismic behavior different than that of aboveground structures or superstructures. Underground structure seismic response is constrained by seismic response of the surrounding soil and cannot experience free vibrations as is the case for aboveground structures. This section focuses on the seismic analysis and design of large linear underground structures commonly used for metro structures, highway tunnels, and large water/sewage transportation ducts in urban areas and can be grouped into three broad categories: (1) bored or mined tunnels, (2) cut-and-cover tunnels, and (3) immersed tunnels (Fig. 1).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Anastasopoulos I, Gerolymos N, Drosos V, Kourkoulis R, Georgarakos T, Gazetas G (2007) Nonlinear response of deep immersed tunnel to strong seismic shaking. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 133(9):1067–1090. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:9(1067)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson DG, Martin GR, Lam I, Wang JN (2008) Seismic analysis and design of retaining walls, buried structures, slopes and embankments, vol NCHRP 611: National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research BoardGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashford SA, Boulanger RW, Donahue JL, Stewart JP (2011) Geotechnical quick report on the Kanto Plain Region during the March 11, 2011, Off Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake, Japan GEER Association report no. GEER-025a: Geotechnical Extreme Events Reconnaissance (GEER)Google Scholar
  4. Coppersmith KJ, Youngs RR (2000) Data needs for probabilistic fault displacement hazard analysis. In: Cello G, Tondi E (eds) The resolution of geological analysis and models for earthquake. Pergamon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Cording EJ, Martin G, Parker H (2011) Century city area tunneling safety and fault investigations: tunnel advisory panel. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  6. EC8 (2002) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  7. Elnashai AS, Gencturk B, Kwon O-S, Al-Qadi IL, Hashash Y, Roesler JR, et al. (2010) The Maule (Chile) earthquake of February 27, 2010 consequence assessment and case studies: Mid-America Earthquake CenterGoogle Scholar
  8. Hamburger RO, Hooper JD (2011) Performance-based seismic design. Mod Steel Constr 4:36–39Google Scholar
  9. Hashash YMA, Park D (2001) Non-linear one-dimensional seismic ground motion propagation in the Mississippi embayment. Eng Geol 62(1–3):185–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hashash YMA, Tseng WS, Krimotat A (1998) Seismic soil-structure interaction analysis for immersed tube tunnels retrofit. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 1998 conference on geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics III. Part 2 (of 2), Seattle, 3–6 Aug 1998Google Scholar
  11. Hashash YMA, Hook JJ, Schmidt B, Yao JI-C (2001) Seismic design and analysis of underground structures. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 16:247–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hashash YMA, Park D, Yao JIC (2005) Ovaling deformations of circular tunnels under seismic loading, an update on seismic design and analysis of underground structures. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 20(5):435–441. doi:10.1016/j.tust.2005.02.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hashash YMA, Karina K, Koutsoftas D, O’Riordan N (2010) Seismic design considerations for underground box structures. Paper presented at the 2010 earth retention conference – earth retention conference 3, Bellevue, 1–4 Aug 2010Google Scholar
  14. Hashash YMA, Groholski D, Musgrove M, Park D, Phillips C, Tsai C-C (2011) DEEPSOIL V5.0, manual and tutorial. Board of Trustees of University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, UrbanaGoogle Scholar
  15. Huo H, Bobet A, Fernández G, Ramírez J (2006) Analytical solution for deep rectangular structures subjected to far-field shear stresses. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 21(6):613–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Iida H, Hiroto T, Yoshida N, Iwafuji M (1996) Damage to the Daikai subway station. Soils and Foundations 283–300. Special issue on geotechnical aspects of the January 17, 1995 Hyogoken-Nambu Earthquake, Tokyo, JapanGoogle Scholar
  17. Kramer GJE, Sedarat H, Kozak A, Liu A, Chai J (2007) Seismic response of precast tunnel linings. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 2007 rapid excavation and tunneling conference, Toronto. Publisher and copyright holder: Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration (SME). www.smenet.org
  18. Lysmer J, Udaka T, Tsai CF, Seed HB (1975) FLUSH: a computer program for approximate 3-D analysis of soil-structure interaction problems. Earthquake Engineering Research Center, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  19. Matasovic N (1993) Seismic response of composite horizontally-layered soil deposits. PhD thesis, University of California, Los Angeles. Retrieved from http://wwwlib.umi.com/pqdd2/search/do?query=au%28Matasovic%2C%20Neven%2C%29%20and%20da%281993%29
  20. Newmark NM (1967) Problems in wave propagation in soil and rock. Paper presented at the international symposium on wave propagation and dynamic properties of earth materials, Albuquerque, NMGoogle Scholar
  21. Peck RB, Hendron AJ, Mohraz B (1972) State of the art in soft ground tunneling. Paper presented at the rapid excavation and tunneling conference, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Penzien J (2000) Seismically induced racking of tunnel linings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 29(5):683–691. doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-9845(200005)29:5<683::aid-eqe932>3.0.co;2-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Power MS, Rosidi D, Kaneshiro J (1996) Volume III Strawman: screening, evaluation, and retrofit design of tunnels. National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, BuffaloGoogle Scholar
  24. Schmidt B, Hashash YMA (1999) Preventing tunnel flotation due to liquefaction. Paper presented at the proceedings of the second international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering, LisbonGoogle Scholar
  25. Schnabel PB, Lysmer JL, Seed HB (1972) SHAKE: a computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites. Earthquake Engineering Research Center, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  26. Sedarat H, Kozak A, Hashash YMA, Shamsabadi A, Krimotat A (2009) Contact interface in seismic analysis of circular tunnels. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 24:482–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. St John CM, Zahrah TF (1987) Aseismic design of underground structures. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2(2):165–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang JN (1993) Seismic design of tunnels: a state-of-the-art approach, Monograph 7. Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang WL, Wang TT, Su JJ, Lin CH, Seng CR, Huang TH (2001) Assessment of damage in mountain tunnels due to the Taiwan Chi-Chi earthquake. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 16(3):133–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Youngs RR, Arabasz WJ, Anderson RE, Ramelli AR, Ake JP, Slemmons DB, et al. (2003) A methodology for probabilistic fault displacement hazard analysis (PFDHA). Earthq Spectra 19(1):191–219. doi:10.1193/1.1542891Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Youssef M. A. Hashash
    • 1
    Email author
  • Maria Ines Romero-Arduz
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2230c Newmark Civil Engineering LaboratoryUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA