Zone of Proximal Development

  • Ingunn Johanne NessEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_60-1

Abstract

The zone of proximal development (ZPD) is a concept mostly associated with Lev Vygotsky, a Russian psychologist. The concept is primarily concerned with social and participatory learning and refers to the space between what a child can do on his or her own and what the child can do with help from someone more capable. However, the ZPD is about more than passive scaffolding from the more capable other. Instead it is closely connected to the idea of expanding the possible, using one’s imagination, and pushing boundaries for what is known. This entry starts with defining the ZPD, and then the central part of the entry outlines the zone’s core principles and elaborates how the ZPD involves creativity, play, and emotions. Positive emotions make it easier to play with ideas and what is possible thinking. Play is a source for development, and Vygotsky’s ideas on creativity, play, and imagination can inspire how teachers teach. When children listen to the teacher or to each other’s experiences, they will be able to think in new ways, and the possible is broadened.

Keywords

Creativity Zone of proximal development Vygotsky Play Emotions Dialogism Experience Imagination Sociocultural psychology 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (1996). Tools of the mind: The Vygotskian approach to early childhood education. Englewood Cliffs: Merrill/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, A. L., & Ferrara, R. A. (1985). Diagnosing zones of proximal development. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 273–305). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Campione, J. C., Brown, A. L., Ferrara, R. A., & Bryant, N. R. (1984). The zone of proximal development: Implications for individual differences and learning. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1984(23), 77–91.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.23219842308|| https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.23219842308|| https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.23219842308|.
  4. Daniels, H. (2007). Pedagogy. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 307–331). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Daniels, H. (2008). Vygotsky and research. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fredrickson, B. L., & Branigan, C. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition & Emotion, 19(3), 313–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Glaveanu, V. P., Ness, I. J., Wasson, B., & Lubart, T. I. (2019). Chapter 4: Sociocultural perspectives on creativity, learning, and technology. In C. A. Mullen (Ed.), Creativity under duress in education? Resistive theories, practices, and action. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1984). Current activity for the future: The Zo-ped. In B. Rogoff & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), Children’s learning in the zone of proximal development (pp. 45–63). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  9. Hasse, C. (2001). Institutional creativity: The relational zone of proximal development. Culture & Psychology, 7(2), 199–221.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X0172005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Holzman, L. (2009). Vygotsky at work and play. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Holzman, L. (2010). Without creating ZPDs there is no creativity. In M. C. Connery, V. John-Steiner, & A. Marjanovic-Shane (Eds.), Vygotsky and creativity: A cultural-historical approach to play, meaning making, and the arts (pp. 27–39). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
  12. John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Educational Psychologist, 31(3–4), 191–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. John-Steiner, V., Connery, M. C., & Marjanovic-Shane, A. (2010). Dancing with the muses: An cultural-historical approach to play, meaning making and creativity. In M. C. Connery, V. John-Steiner, & A. Marjanovic-Shane (Eds.), Vygotsky and creativity: A cultural-historical approach to play, meaning making, and the arts (pp. 3–16). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Lobman, C. (2010). Creating developmental moments: Teaching and learning as creative activities. In M. C. Connery, V. John-Steiner, & A. Marjanovic-Shane (Eds.), Vygotsky and creativity: A cultural-historical approach to play, meaning making, and the arts (pp. 199–214). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Mahn, H., & John-Steiner, V. (2002). The gift of confidence: A Vygotskian view of emotions. In G. Wells & G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for life in the 21st century: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Marjanovic-Shane, A. (2010). From yes and no to me and you: A playful change in relationships and meanings. In M. C. Connery, V. John-Steiner, & A. Marjanovic-Shane (Eds.), Vygotsky and creativity: A cultural-historical approach to play, meaning making, and the arts (pp. 41–59). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. Marjanovic-Shane, A., Connery, M. C., & John-Steiner, V. (2010). A cultural-historical approach to creative education. In M. C. Connery, V. John-Steiner, & A. Marjanovic-Shane (Eds.), Vygotsky and creativity: A cultural-historical approach to play, meaning making, and the arts (pp. 215–232). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
  18. Moran, S., & John-Steiner, V. (2003). Creativity in the making: Vygotsky’s contemporary contribution to the dialectic of creativity & development. In R. K. Sawyer, V. John-Steiner, S. Moran, R. J. Sternberg, D. H. Feldman, J. Nakamura, & M. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Creativity and development (pp. 61–90). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Newman, F., & Holzman, L. (1993). Lev Vygotsky: Revolutionary scientist. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in school. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Ribot, T. (1906/2010). Essay on the creative imagination (A. H. N. Baron, Trans.). Chicago: The Open Court Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  22. Rogoff, B., & Gardner, W. (1984). Adult guidance of cognitive development. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 95–116). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Smagorinsky, P. (2008). Teaching English by design. Portsmouth: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  24. Smolucha, L. W., & Smolucha, F. C. (1986). L.S. Vygotsky’s theory of creative imagination. Spiel, 5(2), 299–308.Google Scholar
  25. Thompson, I. (2012a). Planes of communicative activity in collaborative writing. Changing English, 19(2), 209–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Thompson, I. (2012b). Stimulating reluctant writers: A Vygotskian approach to teaching writing in secondary schools. English in Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 84–91.Google Scholar
  27. van der Veer, R., & Valsiner, J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky: A quest for synthesis. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  28. Vygotsky, L. S. (1930/2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42(1), 7–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vygotsky, L. S. (1934/1987). Thinking and speech (N. Minick, Trans.). In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky (Vol. 1, pp. 39–285). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  30. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. London, UK: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry. Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wertsch, J. V. (1979). From social interaction to higher psychological processes: A clarification and application of Vygotsky’s theory. Human Development, 22(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Psychology, Centre for the Sciences of Learning and Technology (SLATE)University of BergenBergenNorway

Section editors and affiliations

  • Wendy Ross
    • 1
  1. 1.Kingston UniversityKingstonUnited Kingdom