Skip to main content

Creative Learning and the Possible

Book cover The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible

Abstract

Creative learning serves as a vehicle for the possible. Creative learning moves people from what is currently known to new ways of thinking and acting. More specifically, creative learning refers to a process that results in new and personally meaningful understandings for oneself and others. The purpose of this entry is to provide an overview of the theoretical concept of creative learning and its posited relationship to the possible. Research and theoretical implications are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I want to thank the editor of the encyclopedia for requesting clarification on whether creative learning is limited to mini-c creativity. It is important to stress that although creative learning may often be experienced at a more subjective and ideational level (e.g., mini-c creativity, Beghetto and Kaufman 2007), it is also possible that the outcomes of creative learning can be represented in behavioral and material artifacts, which can be recognized by others as creative contributions (e.g., little-c or larger-c creativity, Kaufman and Beghetto 2009).

  2. 2.

    It can be argued from a sociocultural perspective that the socio-cultural does not simply influence individuals from the “outside,” but rather that the socio-cultural is interdependent with and co-constitutive of the creative learning process. I want to again thank the editor of the encyclopedia for noting this important sociocultural distinction.

References

  • Alexander, P. A., Schallert, D. L., & Reynolds, R. E. (2009). What is learning anyway? A topographical perspective considered. Educational Psychologist, 44, 176–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. C., Pitts, C., & Smolkowski, K. (2017). Creative ideation meets relational support: Measuring links between these factors in early adolescence. Creativity Research Journal, 29(3), 244–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2017.1360057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. C., Haney, M., Pitts, C., Porter, L., & Bousselot, T. (2019). “Mistakes can be beautiful”: Creative engagement in arts integration for early adolescent learners. The Journal of Creative Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.401.

  • Beghetto, R. A. (2016). Creative learning: A fresh look. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 15(1), 6–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R. A. (2017). Creative openings in the social interactions of teaching. Creativity: Theories-Research-Applications, 3, 261–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R. A., & Corazza, G. E. (2019). Dynamic perspectives on creativity: New directions for theory, research, and practice. Cham: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for “mini-c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1(2), 73–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R. A., & Schreiber, J. B. (2017). Creativity in doubt: Toward understanding what drives creativity in learning. In R. Leikin & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Creativity and giftedness (pp. 147–162). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38840-3_10.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R. A., & Schuh, K. (in press). Exploring the link between imagination and creativity: A creative learning perspective. In D. D. Preiss, D. Cosmelli, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Mind wandering and creativity. San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corazza, G. E. (2016). Potential originality and effectiveness: The dynamic definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 28(3), 258–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1195627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Еco, U. (1986). Semiotics and the philosophy of language. Bloomington: Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gajda, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Karwowski, M. (2017). Exploring creative learning in the classroom: A multi-method approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 250–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2015). Creativity as a sociocultural act. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 49(3), 165–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2017). The creative self in dialogue. In M. Karwowski & J. C. Kauf- man (Eds.), The creative self: How our beliefs, self-efficacy, mindset, and identity im- pact our creativity. Philadelphia: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glăveanu, V., & Beghetto, R. A. (2016). The difference that makes a creative difference (R. A. Beghetto & B. Sriraman, Eds.). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaveanu, V. P., Hanchett Hanson, M., Baer, J., Barbot, B., Clapp, E. P., Corazza, G. E., … Sternberg, R. J. (2019). Advancing creativity theory and research: A socio-cultural Manifesto. The Journal of Creative Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.395.

  • Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 14, 469–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jankowska, D. M., Czerwonka, M., Lebuda, I., & Karwowski, M. (2018). Exploring the creative process: Integrating psychometric and eye-tracking approaches. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1931. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01931.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, R. E., & Vartanian, O. (Eds.). (2018). The Cambridge handbook of the neuroscience of creativity (1st ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316556238.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Karwowski, M. (2018). The flow of learning. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 14, 291–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karwowski, M., Lebuda, I., & Beghetto, R. A. (2019). Creative self-beliefs. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond Big and Little: The Four C Model of Creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (Eds.). (2018). The Cambridge handbook of instructional feedback (1st ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316832134.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potential, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39, 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothenberg. (2015). Flight from wonder: An investigation of scientific creativity. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (2018). Creative thinking. In L. J. Ball & V. A. Thompson (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 472–486). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., & Beghetto, R. A. (2019). Primary and secondary creativity. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 27, 7–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 92–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. K. (2012). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuh, K. L. (2017). Making meaning by making connections. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0993-2.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sefton-Green, J., Thomson, P., Jones, K., & Bresler, L. (Eds.). (2011). The Routledge international handbook of creative learning. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Glasersfeld, E. (2013). Radical constructivism. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42, 7–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T. B., & Kolomyts, Y. (2010). Cognition and creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyse, D., & Spendlove, D. (2007). Partners in creativity: Action research and creative partnerships. Education, 3(13), 35–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaitchik, D., Solomon, G. E. A., Tardiff, N., & Bascandziev, I. (2016). Conceptual change. In D. Barner & A. S. Baron (Eds.), Core knowledge and conceptual change (pp. 73–88). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190467630.003.0005.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald A. Beghetto .

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Beghetto, R.A. (2020). Creative Learning and the Possible. In: The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_57-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_57-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98390-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98390-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Creative Learning
    Published:
    11 March 2021

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_57-2

  2. Original

    Creative Learning and the Possible
    Published:
    03 March 2020

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_57-1