Advertisement

Antecedents of Team Learning Distilled from Both Qualitative and Quantitative Research

  • Renate WesselinkEmail author
Reference work entry

Abstract

Teams in organizations are increasingly seen as an important level and leverage for innovation and change, because they can help to let individual ideas develop into new institutional practices and support the cascading of new developments into the organization. This, in turn, can lead to the necessary innovation and change. However, why do some teams perform really well and others not? A trustworthy predicting variable of team performance is team learning. A vast amount of research has been done on this topic. However, in team learning research various differences between results were observed. The main aim of this chapter is to make an inventory of antecedents influencing team learning, and to analyze the differences between results found in quantitative and qualitative studies. Results show that many antecedents could be identified, based on both quantitative and qualitative research. And as expected there are significant differences between both strands of research. Whereas quantitative research mainly focuses on testing hypotheses of antecedents influencing team learning, qualitative research tries to unravel mechanisms on how these antecedents work and how team learning processes are influenced. Majority of the research belongs to the quantitative strand, whereas there are major questions open that can only be answered by means of qualitative research.

Keywords

Antecedents of team learning Professional organizations Quantitative and qualitative methods Organizational learning 

References

  1. Akgün AE, Lynn GS (2002) Antecedents and consequences of team stability on new product development performance. J Eng Technol Manag 19(3):263–286.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0923-4748(02)00021-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akgün AE, Byrne JC, Lynn GS, Keskin H (2007) New product development in turbulent environments: impact of improvisation and unlearning on new product performance. J Eng Technol Manag 24(3):203–230.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2007.05.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akgün AE, Lynn GS, Keskin H, Dogan D (2014) Team learning in IT implementation projects: antecedents and consequences. Int J Inf Manag 34(1):37–47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.09.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Argote L, Gruenfeld DH, Naguin C (2001) Group learning in organisations. In: Turner ME (ed) Groups at work: advances in theory and research. Lawrance Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 369–411Google Scholar
  5. Ashauer SA, Macan T (2013) How can leaders Foster team learning? Effects of leader-assigned mastery and performance goals and psychological safety. J Psychol 147(6):541–561.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2012.719940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boak G (2016) Enabling team learning in healthcare. Action Learn: Res Pract 13(2):101–117.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14767333.2016.1150807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bosch-Sijtsema PM, Fruchter R, Vartiainen M, Ruohomäki V (2011) A framework to analyze knowledge work in distributed teams. Group Org Manag 36(3):275–307.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601111403625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bouwmans M, Runhaar P, Wesselink R, Mulder M (2017) Stimulating teachers’ team performance through team-oriented HR practices: the roles of affective team commitment and information processing. Int J Hum Resour Manag 1–23.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1322626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bresman H, Zellmer-Bruhn M (2013) The structural context of team learning: effects of organizational and team structure on internal and external learning. Organ Sci 24(4):1120–1139.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bunderson JS, Boumgarden P (2010) Structure and learning in self-managed teams: why “bureaucratic” teams can be better learners. Organ Sci 21(3):609–624.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cauwelier P, Ribière VM, Bennet A (2016) Team psychological safety and team learning: a cultural perspective. Learn Organ 23(6):458–468.  https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-05-2016-0029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen G, Tjosvold D, Zhao H, Ning N, Fu Y (2011) Constructive controversy for learning and team effectiveness in China*. Asia Pac J Hum Resour 49(1):88–104.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1038411110391708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen SG, Bailey DE (1997) What makes teams work: group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. J Manag 23(3):239–290.  https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639702300303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crossan MM, Lane HW, White RE (1999) An organizational learning framework: from intuition to institution. Acad Manag Rev 24(3):522–537.  https://doi.org/10.2307/259140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Decuyper S, Dochy F, Van den Bossche P (2010) Grasping the dynamic complexity of team learning: an integrative model for effective team learning in organisations. Educ Res Rev 5(2):111–133.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.02.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Døving E, Martín-Rubio I (2013) Managing team learning in a Spanish commercial bank. J Work Learn 25(5):281–295.  https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-Sep-2011-0053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Drach-Zahavy A, Somech A (2001) Understanding team innovation: the role of team processes and structures. Group Dyn Theory Res Pract 5(2):111–123.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.5.2.111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Edmondson AC (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Adm Sci Q 44(2):350–383.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Edmondson AC (2002) The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: a group-level perspective. Organ Sci 13(2):128–146.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.2.128.530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Edmondson AC (2003) Speaking up in the operating room: how team leaders promote learning in the interdisciplinary action teams. J Manage Stud 40(6):1419–1452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hackman JR (1989) Groups that work (and those that don’t): creating conditions for effective teamwork. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  22. Hannes K, Raes E, Vangenechten K, Heyvaert M, Dochy F (2013) Experiences from employees with team learning in a vocational learning or work setting: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educ Res Rev 10(Supplement C):116–132.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.10.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hülsheger UR, Anderson N, Salgado JF (2009) Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. J Appl Psychol 94(5):1128–1145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kumako SK, Asumeng MA (2013) Transformational leadership as a moderator of the relationship between psychological safety and learning behaviour in work teams in Ghana. SA J Ind Psychol 39:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lantz Friedrich A, Sjöberg A, Friedrich P (2016) Leaned teamwork fattens workplace innovation: the relationship between task complexity, team learning and team proactivity. Eur J Work Organ Psy 25(4):561–569.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432x.2016.1183649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leicher V, Mulder RH (2016) Team learning, team performance and safe team climate in elder care nursing. Team Perform Manag: Int J 22(7/8):399–414.  https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-04-2016-0017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li Y-H, Huang J-W (2013) Exploitative and exploratory learning in transactive memory systems and project performance. Inf Manag 50(6):304–313.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.05.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lotz M (2010) Team learning: through the relational dynamics of co-operation and rivalry in team communities. Int J Lifelong Educ 29(5):597–616.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2010.512810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Makoto M (2016) Reflective leadership and team learning: an exploratory study. J Work Learn 28(5):307–321.  https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-12-2015-0089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marsick VJ, Watkins KE (2003) Demonstrating the value of an organization’s learning culture: the dimensions of the learning organization questionnaire. Adv Dev Hum Resour 5(2):132–151.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422303005002002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ortega A, Van den Bossche P, Sánchez-Manzanares M, Rico R, Gil F (2014) The influence of change-oriented leadership and psychological safety on team learning in healthcare teams. J Bus Psychol 29(2):311–321.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9315-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Raes E, Kyndt E, Decuyper S, Van den Bossche P, Dochy F (2015) An exploratory study of group development and team learning. Hum Resour Dev Q 26(1):5–30.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Raes E, Boon A, Kyndt E, Dochy F (2017) Exploring the occurrence of team learning behaviours in project teams over time. Res Pap Educ 32(3):376–401.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2016.1225793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rosendaal B (2009) Sharing knowledge, being different and working as a team. Knowl Manag Res Pract 7(1):4–14.  https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2008.32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Savelsbergh C, Van der Heijden B, Poell R (2010) Attitudes towards factors influencing team performance: a multi-rater approach aimed at establishing the relative importance of team learning behaviors in comparison with other predictors of team performance. Team Perform Manag: Int J 16(7/8):451–474.  https://doi.org/10.1108/13527591011090682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Savelsbergh C, Gevers JMP, van der Heijden BIJM, Poell RF (2012) Team role stress:relationships with team learning and performance in project teams. Group Org Manag 37(1):67–100.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601111431977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Savelsbergh C, Poell R, Van der Heijden B (2015) Does team stability mediate the relationship between leadership and team learning? An empirical study among Dutch project teams. Int J Proj Manag 33(2):406–418.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.08.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Senge PM (1994) The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Sfard A (1998) On two metaphors for learning and the danger of choosing just one. Educ Res 27(2):4–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sparrow J, Heel D (2006) Fostering team learning development. Reflective Pract 7(2):151–162.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940600688381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tynjälä P (2008) Perspectives into learning at the workplace. Educ Res Rev 3(2):130–154.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2007.12.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. van der Haar S, Segers M, Jehn K, Van den Bossche P (2015) Investigating the relation between team learning and the team situation model. Small Group Res 46(1):50–82.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496414558840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. van der Haar S, Koeslag-Kreunen M, Euwe E, Segers M (2017) Team leader structuring for team effectiveness and team learning in command-and-control teams. Small Group Res 48(2):215–248.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496417689897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Van Der Vegt GS, Bunderson JS (2005) Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: the importance of collective team identification. Acad Manag J 48(3):532–547Google Scholar
  45. van der Vegt GS, Stuart B, Ben K (2009) Why turnover matters in self-managing work teams: learning, social integration, and task flexibility. J Manag 36(5):1168–1191.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309344117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Van Woerkom M, Van Engen ML (2009) Learning from conflicts? The relations between task and relationship conflicts, team learning and team performance. Eur J Work Organ Psy 18(4):381–404.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320802569514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vangrieken K, Dochy F, Raes E, Kyndt E (2013) Team entitativity and teacher teams in schools: towards a typology. Frontline Learn Res 1(2):86–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wheelan SA (2009) Group size, group development, and group productivity. Small Group Res 40(2):247–262.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496408328703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wilson JM, Goodman PS, Cronin MA (2007) Group learning. Acad Manag Rev 32(4):1041–1059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yoon SW, Song JH, Lim DH, Joo B-K (2010) Structural determinants of team performance: the mutual influences of learning culture, creativity, and knowledge. Hum Resour Dev Int 13(3):249–264.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2010.483815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zellmer-Bruhn M, Gibson C (2006) Multinational organization context: implications for team learning and performance. Acad Manag J 49(3):501–518.  https://doi.org/10.2307/20159778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zoethout H, Wesselink R, Runhaar P, Mulder M (2017) Using transactivity to understand emergence of team learning. Small Group Res 48(2):190–214.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496417691614CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Education and Learning SciencesWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands

Section editors and affiliations

  • Michael Gessler
    • 1
  • Larissa Holle
    • 2
  • Susanne Peters
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Technology and EducationUniversity of BremenBremenGermany
  2. 2.University of BremenBremenGermany
  3. 3.University of BremenBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations