Advertisement

Innovation Skills in Apprentice Training

  • Ludger DeitmerEmail author
Reference work entry

Abstract

Product and process innovations are of ultimate importance for a long-lasting enterprise competitiveness. Across all branches and services, innovations can be understood as changing the functionality, performance of products, and quality of services including the way they are produced. An important difference between innovations is that of radical versus incremental innovation. Whereas radical innovation is basic and of disruptive character and is based on paradigmatic change of the current technology concept, incremental innovations are of smaller scale and take place concurrently on the basis during work processes. While reflecting on innovation skills for apprentices, it can be stated that incremental innovations could be given into the hands of workers, foremen, and apprentices. Assuming that different in-company training pathways of apprentices are possible, the development of innovation skills toward incremental improvements on product, as well as production processes, could be brought into reality.

But many companies fail to do so because they miss specific vocational development know-how on the level of their vocational trainers. The quality of the products could be improved while a productive manufacturing is in place. But why is it useful that this starts already on apprentice level? Why should they learn things which go beyond the traditional demarcation beyond engineering and production areas? Why is it important of being creative on making incremental improvements within the work process? Under which framework conditions could achievements in apprenticeship training be found and developed further?

Keywords

Apprenticeship Assessment of work-based learning Trainers Quality Cost and return Incremental innovation 

References

  1. Corbett JM, Rasmussen LB, Rauner F (1991) Crossing the border: the social and engineering design of computer integrated manufacturing systems. Springer, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Deitmer L (2011) Building up of innovative capabilities of workers. In: Curtin P (ed) Fostering enterprise: the innovation and skills nexus – research readings. NCVER: National Centre Vocational Education Research, AdelaideGoogle Scholar
  3. Deitmer L, Attwell G (1999) Partnerships and networks: an approach to learning in regions. In: Nyhan B, Attwell G, Deitmer L (eds) Education and regional innovation in the European Union and the United States. CEDEFOP, ThessalonikiGoogle Scholar
  4. Deitmer L, Heinemann L (2009) Evaluation approaches for workplace learning partnerships in VET: how to investigate the learning dimension? In: Stenström M-L, Tynjälä P (eds) Towards integration of work and learning: strategies for connectivity and transformation. Springer International, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  5. Deitmer L, Ruth K (2007) Cornerstones of mentoring processes: how to implement, conduct and evaluate mentoring projects? ITB Forschungsberichte, 29/2007 Universität BremenGoogle Scholar
  6. Hall PA, Soskice D (2001) Varieties of capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Harryson S (1998) Japanese technology and innovation management: from know-how to know-who. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  8. Havighurst RJ (1972) Developmental tasks and education. David McKay, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Heinemann L, Rauner F (2009) Qualität und Rentabilität der beruflichen Bildung: Ergebnisse der QEK Studie im Lande Bremen’ [‘Quality and Return of investment of vocational training and education: results of the QRC study in the Laender of Bremen’], IBB Forschungsbericht 2009, viewed 6 January 2011. http://www.inap.uni-bremen.de
  10. Hirsch-Kreinsen H (2008) Low-Tech Innovation, Ind and Innov 15(11):19–43Google Scholar
  11. Hong P, Doll WJ, Nahm AY, Li X (2004) Knowledge sharing in integrated product development. Eur J Innov Manag 7:102–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Howe F, Heermeyer R, Heuermann H, Höpfner H, Rauner F (2001) Lern- und Arbeitsaufgaben für eine gestaltungsorientierte Berufsbildung [Work and Learning Tasks for design-oriented vocational and education and training]. Christiani Verlag, KonstanzGoogle Scholar
  13. Koch M (2006) Roads to post-fordism: labour markets and social structures in Europe. Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  14. Lundvall BA (ed) (1992) National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Morgan K (1997) The learning region: institutions, innovation and regional renewal. Reg Stud 31(5):191–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nonaka I, Nishiguchi T (2001) Knowledge emergence: social, technical, and evolutionary dimensions of knowledge creation. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge-creating company. How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Nonaka I, Teece D (2001) Managing industrial knowledge: creation, transfer and utilization. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Nyhan B (2002) Capturing the knowledge embedded in ‘practise’ through ‘action research’, in: Barry Nyhan eds. Taking steps towards the knowledge economy reflections on the process of knowledge development, European Centre for the development of Vocational Training, CEDEFOP, Thessalonika, pp 111–129Google Scholar
  20. Piening D, Rauner F (eds) (2014) Kosten, Nutzen und Qualität der Berufsausbildung. Lit Verlag, MünsterGoogle Scholar
  21. QEK-Fibel (2011) Eine Handreichung für den Einsatz des Online Messinstrumentariums”Qualität, Ertrag und Kosten der betrieblichen Ausbildung” für Ausbildungsverantwortliche, Personalentwicklung udn Ausbildungsberatung [Guideline for implementing the online assessment tool “quality, return and cost” in company training for Trainers, HRD administrators and Consultants.]. Forschungsgruppe IBB, Universität BremenGoogle Scholar
  22. Rauner F (2007) Competence development in vocational curricula and work situations. Eur J Vocat Train, no.40, 2007/1Google Scholar
  23. Rauner F (2017) Grundlagen beruflicher Bildung, Mitgestalten der Arbeitswelt [Basics of vocational education – shaping the world of work]. W. Bertelsmann, BielefeldGoogle Scholar
  24. Rauner F, Haasler B (2009) Lernen im Betrieb – eine Handreichung für Ausbilder und Personalentwickler [Learning in the company – guideline for trainers and personal managers]. Christiani Verlag, KonstanzGoogle Scholar
  25. Rauner F, Rasmussen L, Corbett JM (1988) The social shaping of technology and work: human centred computer integrated manufacturing systems. A I & Soc 2(1):7–61Google Scholar
  26. Rauner F, Heinemann L, Piening D (2008) Costs, benefits and quality of apprenticeships – a regional case study: conference proceedings of the second international INAP conference (INAP Innovative Apprenticeship Research network), Vienna, 2008, pp 170–175, viewed 6 January 2011. http://www.inap.uni-bremen.de
  27. Ruth K, Deitmer L (2010) Role of TVET and innovation. In: McGaw B, Baker E, Petersen P (eds) International encyclopaedia of education, 3rd edn. Elsevier, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  28. Schlünssen J (2014) Students un-limited. A conceptualisation of effectuation through an analysis of the entrepreneurial process-from being a student to becoming a founder, CEO and multimillionaire. Aalborg University, Department of Development and Planning, pp 63–86Google Scholar
  29. Senker J (1993) The contribution of tacit knowledge to innovation. A I & Soc 7:208–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Toner P (2011) Workforce skills and innovation: an overview of major themes in the literature. OECD education working paper series. OECD Publishing, ParisGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute Technology and EducationUniversity of BremenBremenGermany

Section editors and affiliations

  • Margarita Pavlova
    • 1
  • Salim Akoojee
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.The Education University of Hong KongHong KongHong Kong
  2. 2.University of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
  3. 3.University of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations