Advertisement

Ethics in Palliative Care Research

  • Kasper RausEmail author
  • Sigrid Sterckx
Reference work entry

Abstract

Today, there is near universal consensus on evidence-based medicine (EBM) as the preferred approach to medical practice. In palliative care, however, a strong evidence base is lacking in many respects, which could result in less than optimal care being provided to patients. Establishing a solid evidence base requires much research to be conducted in palliative care. Such research in palliative care faces both empirical and ethical challenges. In this chapter, we focus on several ethical issues and challenges that are relevant to palliative care research. Many legal and ethical frameworks exist for dealing with research on ethical issues, but this chapter examines how these general frameworks apply more specifically to the domain of palliative care research. We will discuss the key issue of vulnerability in palliative care research. Other issues that will be touched upon are: (1) respect for research participants; (2) the need for independent review; (3) the requirement of social and/or scientific value; (4) issues related to informed consent; (5) challenges regarding scientific validity; (6) favorable risk-benefit ratio; and (7) fair participant selection. In touching upon these issues, most ethical challenges for palliative care research are examined. The chapter aims to show that although many ethical challenges may exist when conducting palliative care research, these challenges should in no way be deemed insurmountable. Research in palliative care is both needed and possible, provided sufficient attention is given to possible ethical sensibilities.

References

  1. Abernethy AP, Capell WH, Aziz NM, Ritchie C, Prince-Paul M, Bennet RE, et al. Ethical conduct of palliative care research: enhancing communication between investigators and institutional review boards. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2014;48(6):1211–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal M, Grady C, Fairclough DL, Meropol NJ, Maynard K, Emanuel EJ. Patients’ decision-making process regarding participation in phase I oncology research. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(27):4479–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aoun SM, Kristjanson LJ. Challenging the framework for evidence in palliative care research. Palliat Med. 2005;19(6):461–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aoun SM, Nekolaichuk C. Improving the evidence base in palliative care to inform practice and policy: thinking outside the box. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2014;48(6):1222–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Appelbaum PS, Roth LH. The therapeutic misconception: informed consent in psychiatric research. Int J Law Psychiatry. 1982;5:319–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beller EM, van Driel ML, McGregor L, Truong S, Mitchell G. Palliative pharmacological sedation for terminally ill adults (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;1:1–40.Google Scholar
  7. Bernabe RDLC, van Thiel GJMW, van Delden JJM. What do international ethics guidelines say in terms of the scope of medical research ethics? BMC Med Ethics. 2016;17(23):1–18.Google Scholar
  8. Bothwell LE, Greene JA, Podolsky SH, Jones DS. Assessing the gold standard – lessons from the history of RCTs. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(22):2175–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bouça-Machado R, Rosário M, Alarcão J, Correia-Guedes L, Abreu D, Ferreira JJ. Clinical trials in palliative care: a systematic review of their methodological characteristics and of the quality of their reporting. BMC Palliat Care. 2017;16(10):1–12.Google Scholar
  10. Bracken-Roche D, Bell E, Macdonald ME, Racine E. The concept of “vulnerability” in research ethics: an in-depth analysis of policies and guidelines. Health Res Policy Syst. 2017;15(8):1–18.Google Scholar
  11. Casarett DJ, Karlawish JHT. Are special ethical guidelines needed for palliative care research? J Pain Symptom Manag. 2000;20(2):130–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz RI. Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(25): 1887–92.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS). International ethical guidelines for health-related research involving humans. 4th ed. Geneva; 2016. Available at https://cioms.ch/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/WEB-CIOMS-EthicalGuidelines.pdf.
  14. de Raeve L. Ethical issues in palliative care research. Palliat Med. 1994;8(4):298–305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Grady C. What makes clinical research ethical? J Am Med Assoc. 2000;283(20): 2701–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grady C. Payment of clinical research subjects. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2005;115(7):1681–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grande GE, Todd CJ. Why are trials in palliative care so difficult? Palliat Med. 2000;14:69–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grossman J, Mackenzie FJ. The randomized controlled trial: gold standard, or merely standard? Perspect Biol Med. 2005;48(4):516–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Henderson GE, Churchill LR, Davis AM, Easter MM, Grady C, Joffe S, et al. Clinical trials and medical care: defining the therapeutic misconception. PLoS Med. 2007;4(11):1735–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hickman SE, Cartwright JC, Nelson CA, Knafl K. Compassion and vigilance: investigators’ strategies to manage ethical concerns in palliative and end-of-life research. J Palliat Med. 2012;15(8):880–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Higginson IJ. Evidence based palliative care: there is some evidence – and there needs to be more. Br Med J. 1999;319:462–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Higginson IJ. Research challenges in palliative and end of life care. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2016;6(1):2–4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hudson P, Aranda S, Kristjanson LJ, Quinn K. Minimising gate-keeping in palliative care research. Eur J Palliat Care. 2005;12(4):165–9.Google Scholar
  24. Kant I. Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012 (1785).Google Scholar
  25. Karlawish JHT. Measuring decision-making capacity in cognitively impaired individuals. Neurosignals. 2008;16(1):91–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kars MC, van Thiel GJMW, van der Graaf R, Moors M, de Graeff A, van Delden JJM. A systematic review of reasons for gatekeeping in palliative care research. Palliat Med. 2016;30(6):533–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kelley AS, McGarry K, Fahle S, Marshall SM, Du Q, Skinner JS. Out-of-Pocket Spending in the Last Five Years of Life. National Bureau of Economic Research Bulletin on Aging and Health. 2010;2:3–4.Google Scholar
  28. Lee S, Kristjanson LJ. Human research ethics committees: issues in palliative care research. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2003;9(1):13–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Levine C, Faden RR, Grady C, Hammerschmidt D, Eckenwiler L, Sugarman J. The limitations of “Vulnerability” as a protection for human research participants. Am J Bioeth. 2004;4(3):44–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ling J, Rees E, Hardy J. What influences participation in clinical trials in palliative care in a cancer centre? Eur J Cancer. 2000;36:621–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Macklin R. On paying money to research subjects: “due” and “undue” inducements. IRB. 1981;3(5):1–6.Google Scholar
  32. Miller FG, Joffe S. Benefit in phase 1 oncology trials: therapeutic misconception or reasonable treatment option? Clinical Trials: Journal of the Society for Clinical Trials. 2008;5(6):617–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nickel PJ. Vulnerable populations in research: the case of the seriously ill. Theor Med Bioeth. 2006;27(3): 245–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nueberger J, Guthrie C, Aaronovitch D, Hameed K, Bonser T, Pentregarth H, et al. More care, less pathway: a review of the liverpool care pathway. 2013. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/212450/Liverpool_Care_Pathway.pdf.
  35. Rink GC, van den Bos GA, Kleijnen J, de Haes HJ, Schadé E, Veenhof CH. Methodologic issues in effectiveness research on palliative cancer care: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15(4):1697–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rothman DJ. Ethics and human experimentation. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:1195–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sackett DL. Evidence based medicine. Semin Perinatol. 1997;21(1):3–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sharkey K, Savulescu J, Aranda S, Schofield P. Clinician gate-keeping in clinical research is not ethically defensible: an analysis. J Med Ethics. 2010;36:363–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sterckx S, Raus K, Mortier F. Continuous sedation at the end of life: ethical, clinical and legal perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013. (Bioethics and Law).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tieman J, Sladek R, Currow D. Changes in the quantity and level of evidence of palliative and hospice care literature: the last century. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(35): 5679–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Visser C, Hadley G, Wee B. Reality of evidence-based practice in palliative care. Cancer Biol Med. 2015;12(3):193–200.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Vollman J, Winau R. Informed consent in human experimentation before the Nuremberg code. Br Med J. 1996;313:1445–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wee B, Hadley G, Derry S. How useful are systematic reviews for informing palliative care practice? Survey of 25 Cochrane systematic reviews. BMC Palliat Care. 2008;7:13.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wendler D. A pragmatic analysis of vulnerability. Bioethics. 2017;31(7):515–25.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wertheimer A. Exploitation in Clinical Research. In: Emanuel EJ, editor. The Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 201–10.Google Scholar
  46. Westfall JM, Mold J, Fagnan L. Practice-based research – “Blue Highways” on the NIH roadmap. J Am Med Assoc. 2007;297(4):403–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. White C, Hardy J. What do palliative care patients and their relatives think about research in palliative care? – A systematic review. Support Care Cancer. 2010;18:905–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. White C, Gilshenan K, Hardy J. A survey of the views of palliative care healthcare professionals towards referring cancer patients to participate in randomized controlled trials in palliative care. Support Care Cancer. 2008;16:1397–405.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Williams EP, Walter JK. When Does the Amount We Pay Research Participants Become “Undue Influence”? J Am Med Assoc. 2015;17(12):1116–21.Google Scholar
  50. Woolf SH. The meaning of translational research and why it matters. J Am Med Assoc. 2008;299(2):211–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. World Medical Association. World medical association declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Am Med Assoc. 2013;310(20):2191–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ghent University HospitalGhentBelgium
  2. 2.Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Ghent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations